THE RESOURCE OF THE FAITHFUL
IN THE RUINS OF CHRISTENDOM
1. A path which vulture’s eye has not seen. (click here)
2. A lesson of no small importance. (Click here)
3. What Jesus said about what He would find on earth when He
returns. (Click here)
4. What the Spirit has to say about the development of
Christendom. (Click here)
5. Gods word is open to all that we might understand His
thoughts. (Click here)
6. The resources available to those that want to be
faithful. (Click here)
7. Which is best, your rules or Gods word? (Click here)
8. Mans ways always tend to ruin Gods work. (Click here)
9. The Lord provides for those who want to be faithful. (Click here)
10. Act on what you see from the word and trust the Lord for
what will follow. (Click here)
11. There is only one gathering center for all that call
upon the Lord out of a pure heart. (Click here)
12. Are there church associations that are not based on and governed by the name of Christ? (Click here)
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
1. A path which vulture’s eye has not seen.
How many elements of solemnity are crowded into the subject
now before us! It is solemn to look over Christendom and survey its ruins, now
too palpable to be denied. It is solemn, on the other side, to think of the
faithful goodness of God, who knew all beforehand, spread it out in the
unerring word of His grace, and has shown us that, if He felt the evil that was
about to cover the scene of the profession of Christ's name on earth, His
loving wisdom descried a sure path — a path the vulture's eye does not see,
which nevertheless He gives His people to discern, and by means of which they
can have the happy certainty that they are pleasing God.
To those who for the sake of the Lord and the truth deplore
and refuse to have fellowship with the current practice of Christendom, there
may be a certain necessity to give as strong proofs as may be of those evils
which now abound, and of which the word of God forewarned when they were but in
the germ. Indeed there may be a kind of temptation to prove the evil, where we
feel in anywise the need of a justification for the path of separation to God.
But that tendency is corrected promptly, and the heart receives its due tone
and its right attitude, when we think who after all is most concerned, and
whose honour it is we have to justify. The Lord preserve us from thinking of
ourselves! It is unworthy of those who belong to Christ. Be it our boast to
justify Him alone.
It will be my business now to show, not that He needs aught
from us, not that His words of light require the tapers of man to make them
more distinct, but that divine charity seeks the blessing of every one,
especially of those who are comparatively young and uninformed in the truth of
God. I hope to give enough at least of the evidence to show most plainly what
the will of the Lord is; how faithfully His word deals with us; how worthy of
trust both He Himself is and that which He has put into our hands. This may
encourage the most diffident of God's children to look up with confidence,
seeing that the end was as plain to Him as the beginning, and that for us the
only path is that of Christ, for there cannot be two. He is the way, and
as there is but one Christ, so there can be therefore but one path that
satisfies the heart and mind of Christ for those who love Him.
Am I going to produce strong reasons as if one needed to
justify this? It will be enough to explain what He has pointed out. To those
who know Him there will be the most complete justification and the strongest
reason in the fact that it is His path for us, though His goodness has given,
alas! too sure and abundant proof how deeply it is needed.
2. A lesson of no small importance.
Further I shall have the opportunity tonight of slightly
reviewing the ground over which we have passed on previous occasions, and of
showing how all that is most precious has been secured to the faithful. Not
that the Lord has not been pleased to take away much. Not that we ought to be
unfeeling about anything that concerns the Lord's power and glory in the
church. But if we rightly claim a higher place for that which concerns God in
His moral ways; if we ought to feel that what brings and keeps before us the
grace of Christ must be of deeper value than any displays of power before men;
yet on the other hand, beloved brethren, it would be a wrong to the Lord if we
looked with cold indifference on the utter weakness of this our day, and the
dishonour thus put upon the name of Jesus in Christendom itself. Alas! there is
no place among the outside strangers to the Lord Jesus where there is more
daring enormity done than in the very scene where men are baptized in His name.
When we look back at times long past, at the early days of the church's
pilgrimage on the earth, and the power of the Holy Ghost then displayed, I am
persuaded we ought to feel for the wounds inflicted in the house of His
friends; we ought to be grieved that the bearing of the church was such that
the Lord could not outwardly pour honour upon her, but was obliged to strip her
as it were, and shame her before the enemies of His name.
Let us own all this, as also the far deeper sorrow that men
so little prize the truth, so tamely feel for the honour of the Lord's person
in Christendom, not to speak of the well-nigh universal want of feeling even
what the church is in its barest and simplest forms, and still more the total
forgetfulness of its bright portion as one with the Saviour, and of that which
the church hopes for in the day to come. Be assured that if we do not thus feel
with the Lord in our little measure, we are not in a moral condition rightly to
act upon His word in present things. It is a lesson of no small importance to
see that the Lord has not given us in scripture that which admits of bare
imitation. It does not suffice to take up the epistles of St. Paul for
instance, and set to work as if we were competent to put in order the things
that are wanting, and ordain elders here or there. It is one thing to fall back
upon the word God has given us, and quite another to assume that we can
reinstate the church now that it has been broken up and ruined. It is right to
feel its low estate, but that we should now build up again that which is thus
fallen the very thought proves that the heart in this has no communion with
Christ; that there is a lack of due holy distrust of self; that there is such
insensibility to the true state of things now as unfits not merely for
authoritatively restoring the church, but even for the humbleness of faith that
confides in the actual resources of Christ. For it is an unvarying principle of
God, that when there has been a departure from Himself, it matters not under
what circumstances or time or place or people — whether before the flood or
since — whether in Israel or in the church — God insists upon it that the first
step in that which is morally good should be the sense of our real evil in His
sight. When this is the case, the presumption will be far from us that we can
make good that wonderful display of divine power, grace, and wisdom — the
church of GOD! It was the greatest work, so to speak, that God ever wrought
upon the earth (next to the Cross, whereby alone such a work became possible).
God forbid that in thinking of what He has done, we should
compare that which stands alone — alone throughout all eternity! But if we look
at all that has ever been done upon the earth, or even the very making of
heaven and earth, I say, that the work of God in His church — the church of God
— was greater still. And now, we poor leaky vessels that could not keep the
blessing, we that have been through our own weakness and unwatchfulness a prey
to Satan's wiles, and let in the thieves and robbers that have spoiled the
house of God, are we the men to set it up again? Is this the feeling of lowly
faith? If it were bad for man to go away, if it were a grievous thing for
Israel to dishonour the law of God, what must it be for the church to slight
God the Holy Ghost? It is the epistle of Christ, the habitation of God through
the Spirit, the object of His most perfect love, accepted in the Beloved, even
in Christ, made the righteousness of God in Him. What is it then for that
church practically to forego the glory of God here below — to prefer the work
of their own hands to His word and Spirit — once more to bow down to idols
graven by art and man's device? Oh! it is more loathsome than that which
scripture or even history records of days and men infinitely less privileged.
Think not that I am exaggerating what Christendom has done
or does. Nor do I wish to dilate more than is absolutely needful upon the
painful failure of that which bears the name of Christ here below. In truth it
is not so. But let us hear what the word of God says upon the subject. Who
would allow, the thought that He speaks too strongly of that which He saw from
the first, and told us was coming as He looked into the future?
3. What Jesus said about what He
would find on earth when He returns.
Let us begin with the Saviour Himself and see what He
intimated to His disciples should be found when He returns again to the earth,
when He summons man to give an account of himself. In Luke 17. He tells us not
that the world should become gradually changed from a wilderness to a Paradise,
nor that the heathen should lay aside their false gods and the Jews their
enmity to the true Messiah. On the contrary He gives the disciples the needed
warning, that it was to be as in the days of Noah, and in the days of Lot.
These were times of ease and worldliness, when all mankind was rising up
against God; and yet they furnished comparisons for the scenes which are to
meet the Lord as He appears from heaven to judge the world. "As it was in
the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did
eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day
that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all."
The self-security and love of ease will be substantially the same when the Lord
is revealed as just before the flood. Then as of old men will be engrossed in
the ordinary matters of daily life. Spite of the law, spite of the gospel,
again is seen and will be continued that state of corruption and violence which
brought the Deluge upon the earth no less guilty than utterly unconcerned. And
Christ looks onward to the day of His return: no previous millennium of holy
bliss awaiting Him; no happy rejoicing hearts characterizing the world
generally then; but on the contrary the same moral condition, the same
indifference to God's will and glory which preceded the flood.
After the flood when nations and tongues began there was
another scene more appalling and degrading, which the same book of Genesis
brings before us; and this also furnishes its sad complement to the picture of
the days just before the Son of man comes again. "Like also as it was in
the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they
planted, they builded; but the same day that Lot went out of Sodom" (most
ominous words!) "it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed
them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is
revealed"
4. What the Spirit has to say
about the development of Christendom.
If we take up now the Epistles, we shall find the light shed
by the Holy Ghost in no way weakens but confirms in every respect the testimony
of the Lord Jesus; only that now we have naturally the Holy Ghost looking
rather at professing Christendom, whereas our Lord made the Jews His starting-point
and centre.
Thus in Romans 11, without dwelling at length upon the
chapter, the Spirit of God anticipates the end of Christendom. "Boast not
against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the
root thee." Such is the warning given to the Gentile professor. The Jews
are meant by the natural branches. They had been the depositaries of promise of
old, and had therefore the responsible place of testimony for God upon the
earth. Hence they were the original branches of the olive tree, the line of
promise and testimony on the earth which began with Abraham. But the Jews broke
the law, went after idols, refused and slew the Messiah. There was a resource
in the gospel; but they refused the gospel from heaven, as well as the Lord their
King on earth. The consequence is, that the natural branches of the olive tree
were broken off, and the wild olive, or Gentile, grafted into the old stock of
profession. And this is the warning that is given: "Thou wilt say then,
The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in." Has not this
exactly been the feeling of Christendom? Contempt for the Jews, astonishment at
their wickedness, utter insensibility as to their own condition. "Well;
because of unbelief, they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not
high-minded, but fear; for if God spared not the natural branches, take heed
lest He also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God:
on them which fell, severity; but towards thee, goodness, if thou continue in
His goodness."
Let me ask any man that has the smallest fear of God, or
even outward acquaintance with His word, Has Christianity continued in the
goodness of God? Is there any Protestant, any Roman Catholic, who thinks so? Is
there any person, no matter where, no matter who — a single soul who dares to
say that Christendom, the professing Gentile, has continued in the goodness of
God? The Romanist cannot think the Protestant schism continues in the goodness
of God. The Protestant is assured that the Romish body is the fruit of clean
departure from God in superstition; and so we might run through all existing
systems. They may each plead for his own association; but who will say that
even his own has continued faithful? They may believe that it means well, and
would be admirable if carried out; but who would not acknowledge that it has
not been carried out? that consequently no sect, no portion, no fragment even,
has continued in the goodness of God? All agree that, as for the mass of
profession outside themselves, it has failed to testify for the goodness of
God. Consequently there rises up from men on every side the acknowledgment that
the Gentile has not continued in it. Not that the failure is felt as it should
be; not that there is adequate confession and renunciation of our common sin
before God. Where sin is really spread out to God, it will not be persisted in.
But at least there is an outward acknowledgment to a certain extent in the
earth now, and quite enough to prove that Christianity has not continued in the
goodness of God. What then says the word of the Lord? "Thou also shalt be
cut off." The Gentile shall be cut off for his faithlessness, as surely as
the Jew was.
This, remark, is not in some prophetic portion of God's
word, which some might think ambiguous, though we do not allow the thought for
a moment that any part of the word of God is so. But here in an epistle which
every Christian allows to be one of the most fundamental and comprehensive,
which takes up Christianity from its elements, and through which the Lord has
established souls in peace, perhaps more than through any other portion of His
word; it is in this epistle to the Romans that we have the solemn announcement
of the sure cutting off of the Gentiles. Not merely one part or another but the
Gentile profession is doomed of God, because it has not continued in His
goodness; as truly as the Jew is now cast out from his heritage, a bye-word and
a reproach to all the earth, evidently bearing his doom stamped upon his brow.
To examine many of the epistles would more than occupy my
time. Suffice it to say, that as we travel down the stream from 2
Thessalonians, which was one of the earliest epistles written by Paul, to the
latest, the Epistles of John and Jude, we have only an increasing testimony,
growing more distinct and urgent and awful. As the evil grew, so the signs of
judgment became more apparent. The Spirit of God sounds the trumpet with no
uncertain note, and wakes up the faithful where there is an ear to hear.
Christendom was gradually being undermined, and would become, in no long time,
the engine of opposition to God — would be made the theatre of the grossest
evil, taking up the abominations not only of the Jews but of the heathen
themselves, and consecrating a system of Idolatry under the name of Christ and
His mother, saints and angels, even more frightful and guilty than anything
ever before found here below. For the very fact of praying to Peter, Paul, or
the Virgin, proves that the light of Christianity must in some measure have
been known, before it ended in so distressing an apostasy. Does any one think
the expression "apostasy" over-strong? Allow me to tell them that the
very phrase "the apostasy" is the expression of the Holy Ghost in the
second epistle to the Thessalonians, where we are told "there is a mystery
of iniquity which now worketh." Only there is now a hindering power.
Consequently it would not burst out into its full development all at once; it
was kept in check for a certain time by the good hand of the Lord for the
purposes of His own grace. But the moment that this restraint was gone, then it
would be no mystery any longer, but manifest lawlessness. It is called "a
(or rather "the") falling away," or the apostasy. This must
become ripe, and "the man of sin" must be revealed. Thus we have too
plainly an uninterrupted succession of evil. This is the vista described in the
scripture; a succession of evil that goes on always swelling in intensity and
volume till at last when the restraint is removed, it bursts out into a yet
more fearful issue — not "the apostasy" only, but "the man of
sin." What a contrast to the Man of righteousness, when man dares to take
the place of God in the temple of God!
This then is what Christendom is to the Christian watchman.
It has not of course been realized in all its force, though I do not deny that
there have been various and also growing manifestations of evil. As the apostle
John tells us, "Even now there are many antichrists, whereby we know that
it is the last time." This is so much the more remarkable because he shows
that the Antichrist was coming, the great token of which is that there were
many antichrists then. They knew thereby it was the last time. The Spirit would
not close the volume of the New Testament until the worst evil was actually
there at least in its germ; and this being so and descried by inspiration,
there was need of nothing further. The Spirit of God could, as it were, fold up
the sacred roll. It was complete. The mystery of lawlessness is shown already
at work, "the man of sin" is predicted; the mystery of Christ and the
Church no longer hid but disclosed. Scripture had attained its full compass.
There remains, not some fresh view of Christ, so to speak, but contrariwise the
unfolding of that Christ whom they had already, the bringing out more
intimately and appreciatively the light of the love of God that was in the Lord
Jesus Christ from the beginning. This is the antidote of all Satan can bring —
to the many antichrists, and at last to the Antichrist. I refer to it in
order to give a kind of connection between the different states — the rise,
progress, and final manifestation of lawlessness. Nay more the lawless one is
to exalt himself against the Lord of glory. The last book of the New Testament shows
the millennial reign over the earth, ushered in by the destruction of the beast
and the false prophet with all their company, as Babylon had been previously
destroyed.
Thus rapidly have we glanced without entering into all the
proofs of the doom of Christendom. They are patent in the general epistles and
in particular in the epistle of Jude where a most energetic sketch is given in
the compass of a single verse (11). With that power which the Spirit of God
only knows how to convey the shadows of Cain are sketched, then of Balaam, and
finally of the gainsaying Core. Is there nothing for Christendom there? Is
there no sound of sure if slumbering judgment there? "Woe unto them! for
they have gone in the way of Cain" — that unnatural brother, that
pretender to religion, who brought his offering to the Lord but slew the
guiltless. Is there no presage in him who received the wages of unrighteousness
— in the man who, spite of himself, prophesied glorious things of a people that
he loved not but would have sold to destruction? Is there no solemn lesson in
the wages received for teaching, it may be, the glorious things of God, without
heart for His people, still less any care or jealousy for His word, for His
will, for His glory? Finally, in the fearful rebellion of Korah, "the
gainsaying of Core," in those who had the ministry of the sanctuary, in
the proud Levites who coveted and arrogated to themselves the place of Moses
and Aaron (the apostle and the high priest of the Jewish profession), is there no
awful warning there? Have you never heard of men professing to be servants of
Christ, and yet pretending to be priests strictly, officially, and exclusively
— assuming to be authoritative channels of divine pardon empowered on earth to
absolve from guilt before God? I do not speak only of such as claim in their
heathenish darkness to offer a sacrifice for the dead as well as the living.
Assuredly one thinks not with bitterness about such things as these, but we may
all stand aghast as we survey the facts realized in Christendom. If it be a
prophecy, it is a prophecy fulfilled.
All this may suffice to show how little Christendom has
continued in the goodness of God. Details are needless. The godliest members of
the various religious societies would be the first to confess the failure of
their own. God's controversy is not with one only but with all, though
doubtless the proudest will meet with a peculiar judgment. It is evident also
that the word of God leaves it not to human experience or to spiritual judgment
to infer His thoughts of Christendom; He has pronounced upon it Himself. Hence
it is not presumptuous, but on the contrary the part of humble faith to believe
God in this. How good He is thus to cut off the fear of forming a judgment so
stern! For now he that does not pronounce after the Lord is ignorant of his
Master's mind, or is false to His will. He that would defend or justify
Christendom does not, in effect, fear to give the Lord the lie. From the
scriptures enough has been given to show that the man who can look on
Christendom and vindicate what is around us ignorantly or wilfully slights all
the instruction that the Holy Ghost has given on the subject. Undoubtedly this
is strong; but it is the Lord's goodness which makes the owning of it now to be
a matter of sympathy with Him, and not of a proud claim to superior light.
5. Gods word is open to all that
we might understand His thoughts.
God's word is open to all. By it we are all bound to see as
He sees. The Lord admits of no vain excuses that we cannot judge. The
Spirit of God, who judges and discerns all things, dwells in every Christian.
He that says he cannot judge Christendom virtually denies himself to be a
spiritual man; but if we do judge that Christendom has fallen into these
predicted evils one after another, and that what was then but budding is now
bearing the most bitter and baneful fruit, I ask, are we to partake of it? Are
we to be insensible to our own share of the common sin? If the Lord graciously
imparts the strongest warning, are we to satisfy ourselves with that flimsiest
and most profane of apologies, that when the Lord comes He will set it all
right? Yes, but it will be too late to set right my conscious
Christ-dishonouring unfaithfulness; it will be to my shame to live till then
indifferent to His word, careless of His glory, regardless of the Holy Ghost,
who is grieved by that which I have been allowing practically. Am I, or am I
not, to refrain from that which insults Him? If I know these things, am I to
content myself without doing them. He who does puts himself in the guiltiest
place of all. Do I know and feel the despite Christendom does and I have done
to the Spirit of grace? Then let me look up in dependence on the Lord, that I
may do it no more, nor settle down in a pretext so lame and criminal as that
the Lord will set all to rights again. Is He not coming to judge every evil
way? No doubt He will bring in good, and this from above! but He will judge all
evil, and yet more than in times past. In vain then do I essay to shelter myself
under the blessed truth, that the Lord is coming to display the kingdom of God
upon earth. Assuredly, He will. From the heavens He will come, and fill the
earth with the peace and blessing He brings with Himself, instead of finding it
here below. A few poor broken hearts He will find in the world — a godly
remnant, crying out, like the importunate widow in the guilty city where ruled
the judge that feared neither God nor man. Such and worse will be the state of
things, and in their midst shall He find faith on the earth? Yes, but crying
out in alarm. And so He will clear the world with the avenging sword, before He
establishes His throne of righteousness upon it. Of course I speak figuratively
now; but the fact will be unsparing divine judgment; and therefore how blind
for any to harden themselves in going on with sin under the plea that the Lord
is coming to set the world and church to rights!
6. The resources available to those that want to be
faithful.
Allow me to say further, that the Lord has not left us to
our own thoughts any more of the good than of the evil. He has given us His
path, and this is what the heart desires to come to — the resources of the
faithful in the ruins of Christendom. It were strange indeed if the word of God
shed no sure light where it is so needed? Can we conceive such a thing as the
Lord giving His view of the darkening future, and no provident care for His
beloved and feeble and trembling followers? We began with the Lord's testimony
about man's evil; let us see how He ensures good for His people in the midst of
it. For Matt. 18 we may bless the Lord. Although He is giving instruction as to
the animating spring of the assembly, which is grace, (as law was the governing
principle of the synagogue,) the Lord provides what would be deeply needed, if
they were reduced to a handful. "Where two or three are gathered together
in my name, there am I in the midst of them" (ver. 20). Could one conceive
more tender thought, or more evident wisdom than the Lord thus caring for His
own in a dark day? To this the goodly flock might come — that assembly which
once stood out so fair, with its thousands on whom great grace rested. How wise
thus to prepare the hearts of His servants! How well He knew and guarded
against the anxieties of His saints! We know what numbers are to the worldly
spirit, and how apt we are to rest upon that which looks great in the earth.
Yet nothing is more destructive of Christianity. He that has not a heart for
the two or three must be only a dead weight if he were among ten thousand. It
might be no doubt that he would be carried along the stream of happy
multitudes; and that which was thus unfaithful to the mind of Christ might pass
unnoticed in the strong current and new-born delight in the Saviour,
transporting all around, as was no doubt the case on that bright day when the
Holy Ghost came down from heaven to be the herald of the glory of the Lord, and
to make believing men on earth the dwelling-place of God. We can understand
that at Pentecost the tide of joy rose so high as to cover all such elements,
sure as they were to appear later on.
And soon it came, too soon, when sounds of discontent were
heard even in that blessed habitation of God. Alas! man was there; not God only
in His goodness but man; and behind was the adversary ready to dishonour the
one through the other.
The church, like man and Israel, has to be tried on earth.
What is the declared issue? Never was there such blessing entrusted to man; but
man is as faithless under the gospel as he was rebellious under the law. The
Holy Ghost is slighted as the Son had been; and in the day when eternal
realities are revealed man turns back to the shadows of Judaism, preferring
them to the substantial truth of God. This is the history of Christendom. And
the Lord, with it all spread out before His prescient eyes, comforts His
followers, were they ever so few and weak, with the assurance of His presence
where His name has its central place to their faith.
In the prospect of coming evil how gracious of the Lord to
think, it may be, of some obscure village — of some solitary ship that travels
across the ocean — of some comparatively desert island — yea, or of the vast
and crowded city, where the very solitariness of discipleship is more realized
sometimes than anywhere else! Wherever, however, whenever it might be, the Lord
gives His own weight of authority to the two or three gathered unto His name.
It is not merely His blessing — where could He not bless? Blessing He went on
high, and never since — if I may so say — never has He laid down the hands
which He then lifted up in blessing. It could not be otherwise till He come in
judgment. His work was infinite. Who could limit the preciousness of His blood?
Who could say that redemption, like the first covenant, was grown old, and
ready to vanish away? Could any difficulty, danger, or need in Christendom turn
that grace back, as it were, into its spring, or dry up those rivers of living
waters which they that believe should receive? It could not be; but there is more
than all that here. Not only is there blessing but there is also the weight of
His authority guaranteed to the smallest real representative of His assembly.
We know that men shrink back from church discipline; and he need not wonder at
this who is aware how it was made under the fairest pretences the most
abominable scourge of tyranny the earth ever beheld. One cannot, therefore, be
surprised that Christians who had escaped from the weight of that iron hand
should somewhat shrink back at the bare sound. But we must beware of
mistrusting Him to whom we owe our every blessing, because Babylon, the
world-church, has perverted His words. But if there were only two or three,
there ought to be as much jealousy as if there were three thousand to maintain
publicly and privately, collectively and individually, ways consistent with the
character of Christ. This cannot be unless there be discipline. The obligation
of an united pure walk is bound up with the very integrity and being of God's
assembly. It ceases to be the church of God, unless there be the holy earnest
solemn carrying out of that which the Lord has laid down. "Purge out,
therefore, the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are
unleavened." No ruin can touch this responsibility for a moment. On the other
hand the Lord takes care in his grace that blessing shall flow spite of
failure.
7. Which is best, your rules or
Gods word?
But there is more than the sovereign action of divine grace,
where responsibility may have been little felt and the will of God
misunderstood. The Lord watches over those gathered together to His name, and
is there present in their midst were they but two or three. What unfailing and
inestimable comfort! Conceive for a moment some Christian awakened to feel that
the place of a believer is not to be a member merely of the ecclesiastical
system of the country or of particular views, but on the contrary that the only
thing which suits and is due to Christ is that we should renounce — we cannot
be too lowly, but neither can we be too thorough in renouncing — every tie that
is not connected with Christ. Where we can obey Christ in the midst of those
that are His — where the Holy Ghost is allowed freedom to work according to the
word of God — there is God's church, and nowhere else. The liberty of the
Spirit is to exalt Christ and this only. This is a universal principle, true of
an individual and true of the assembly. It would be a miserable thing if the
assembly were not a scene of true and blessed liberty; but such it is that God
may be glorified by Christ Jesus. There will be also the consciousness of that
which is offensive just in proportion to the spiritual power that is in the
assembly.
A great or a small company makes no essential difference.
The Holy Ghost is sent down to care for the interests of the name of Christ.
The two or three weak and ignorant ones gathered to it at least know that they
are His; that they ought not therefore to belong to man; that they ought not
therefore to be under any other tie; that rules made by one or many or all — if
they were the very best that were ever produced — are not entitled to bind
Christians, seeing that God has already furnished the only perfect standard not
only of faith but of church fellowship, and that to own another is to dishonour
the word of God and the Holy Ghost who is here to make it good in power. The
question is not whether we can do better than others: God forbid: that indeed
were presumption. But this I ask, whoever you may be (and I trust that, if you
are a Christian, you will agree with me), Which is best, your rules or God's
word? If God, and not you, be the wiser, how came you to invent these rules?
You thought the word of God insufficient, and you must supply the deficiency!
What is the result? Take what is going on at the present moment, and in any
society you like. The very newspapers ring with the scandal of what is done
under the name of Christ. What do your rules avail? Neither you nor the wisest
of men can construct a standard for all time; and why should it be attempted?
God has given His own, and His children need no other.
We have already the only sure and divine rule. The only want
is the faith to value and act upon it. True, the consequences are serious.
Faithfulness to Christ costs much now as ever. But is it not a solemn thought
that now, in this boasted nineteenth century after the Lord has accomplished
redemption, we are only awakening, here and there, to feel that the word of God
is better than the word of man? What a discovery! Yet it is great as it is humbling
that it should be a new thing — a discovery which many of the children of God
have not yet made. All admit that God's word is infinitely wise for the soul's
salvation. Who, when it is a question of eternal issues, would trust his soul
to the doctrines of men? Then is felt the value of that word which reveals the
Saviour, and of the blessed Spirit who makes the word precious in the
revelation of Him. But is it not daring to draw these distinctions in the word
of God, and to put aside that which speaks of the church, ministry, worship,
the breaking of bread, and prayer? How comes it that men should behave
practically as if God's word had less decision and authority in these matters
than the shifting thoughts of man? How comes it that men so seldom think of
being guided only by the word of God? How comes it that believers resort as a
matter of course to human ecclesiastical rules? How comes it, for example, that
dissenters, the best of them, when they want a minister in the word, proceed at
once to elect him without a syllable of scripture for that course? Who gave
them licence to do so?
8. Mans ways always tend to ruin
Gods work.
"It must be so; we have our own doctor and our own
lawyer, and why not our own minister?" It is exactly this worldly principle
that has done the mischief. Why is not God consulted in His word? How comes it
that in scripture a church never elects a minister? Of course there must have
been many who wanted ministerial help in those days as now; and God, who knew
all that is good, must have known every want also. How comes it that there was
never a man chosen by a Christian congregation to preach the gospel or teach
the saints — not a solitary instance in the word of God? They cannot get rid of
the difficulty. What are they to do? The fact is, the dissenting principle is
broken at the very outset. They cannot step over the threshold. They cannot do
without a minister, and they cannot elect a minister according to scripture.
Let us look now, not at congregationalism, but at the two or three gathered to
the name of Christ. They too want help, these feeble ones; and what are they to
do? This is the word of their Lord, "Where two or three are gathered
together unto my name, there am I in the midst of them." God forbid that I
should disparage the advantages of ministry; but to be simply subject to the
Lord, whether or not He sends, is the best of all. The fact is, as we are not
authorized, so we have no need to elect any; for all are ours already,
"whether Paul, Apollos, or Cephas." It is for God to choose and give.
He has bound up and made all His ministers part and parcel of the church. They
are members of Christ's body. They are His gifts to the church. It is ignorant
and evil meddling for the church to elect. Besides, the moment you elect one to
be peculiarly your minister, by that very act you defraud yourselves of all the
rest. You are going out of the path of God in order to enrich yourselves in
this respect; but that very act of selfish haste, like every other departure
from the path of faith, brings, as the necessary result, the surest
impoverishment. Suppose then people get their minister; he may be but young,
and they may want to be nourished and fed up in truth. Unless he have all the
gifts centred in his single person, they are reduced to his individual measure.
Another again may be a pastor, and love the saints; but the congregation for
the most part consists of persons needing to be converted, while he is not an
evangelist but a pastor and perhaps a teacher. How evident that, if tested thus
practically, man's ways always ruin God's work! The parochial system in the
established bodies works as much or more evil. It may seem natural and prudent,
but human wisdom in divine things is as foolish as it is fatal What else could
be expected by those who know God and man from a departure from the rich
provision the Lord has made?
9. The Lord provides for those who
want to be faithful.
Let us now look on the other side. The Lord is there. The
"two or three" do not exactly see their way. They are in presence of
a great difficulty. Perhaps they have heard the whisper of some dreadful
doctrine, and they do not understand it, not being versed in these matters.
What then? They wait upon the Lord — a wholesome thing for any of us — most
wholesome to be obliged to feel that the Lord alone can avail. But He does love
and care for His saints. He raises up and opportunely sends a servant of His.
The latent evil is brought out plainly; and the moment the light of God by
whatever means is cast upon it, the conscience of the saints answers to the
call of the Lord, and they repudiate it heartily for themselves.
Again there is one fallen into what may seem a little evil,
yet enough to render him indifferent to the Lord, to His word, to His grace. He
refuses to listen to the warning of one, then of more, and lastly of the
assembly of God. "Let him be unto thee as a heathen man." He is not a
heathen, but supposed to be a brother; yet he is treated as if he were a
heathen, because he despises Christ in the church. This in fact is the case
here supposed. (Matt. 18) Such decision is trying to the heart, where will
works among the saints. But it shows plainly that not their wisdom nor their
experience guides aright, but the Lord in their midst; and He promises His presence
if it were but two or three gathered to His name. Here then we have a clear and
positive provision for the faithful in the worst of times. It is hardly
possible to conceive of circumstances where there might not be "two or
three."
It is well however to add that the essential point is their
gathering to His name. It is not such a gathering unto Christ, where narrowness
is allowed, or sectarianism, any more than in the grosser forms of letting in
the world or tolerating evil. If any "two or three" were so happy
together, as to look with suspicion on godly men outside them, they would
forfeit their place of privilege, and be in a false position. Does the Lord so
regard His disciples? Does He scrutinize them as if they were doubtful
characters, or put them in quarantine as if the plague might be in them? I
speak of saints where there is no suspicion of evil doctrine, direct or
indirect, or of unholy walk. The Lord welcomes them, and so should we. His name
has not its value where we are not large for His sake.
But there may be another case. A person comes of great
repute in the world, who has been preaching and is universally respected; but
alas! he betrays himself by a lack of heart and conscience where Christ is
concerned. Him they refuse. Thus the same name of Christ, which is their
warrant for welcoming the weakest that loves Him, is here exactly the same
power for refusing the highest who does not love our Lord Jesus Christ in
incorruption. What might is in that name to bring and keep together hearts
otherwise alien, and yet withal what a delicate test for detecting and
excluding what is not of God! If it be a question of truth, the name of the
Lord is the only real touchstone; if it be a question of discipline, that name
is strength to the feeblest heart; if it be a question between persons and
principle, there only is found all needed wisdom and power both individually
and as regards the assembly.
But let us look now at 2 Tim. 2. We have a picture drawn by
the Holy Ghost of the professing body, the house of God. The first epistle duly
cares for order and good government in the house of God. The second epistle
anticipates the influx of evils to such an extent that the house is merely
alluded to as a comparison. Still "the sure foundation of God standeth,
having this seal" — on one side, "The Lord knoweth them that are
His," and on the other, "Let every one that nameth the name of the
Lord depart from iniquity." There are thus the sovereignty of the Lord on
one side, and just responsibility on the other — two great principles which
meet us everywhere. Then follows a more detailed application. — "But in a
great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood
and of earth, and some to honour and some to dishonour." Some would take the
place of knowing the Lord whom He did not own, and who felt not the incongruity
of His name with iniquity. Timothy must be prepared for the development of evil
among those that confess Christ — not only "some to honour" but
"some to dishonour." "If a man therefore purge himself from
these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified and meet for the Master's
use, and prepared unto every good work." Separation from evil is the
invariable principle of God, modified as to the manner of course by the special
character of the dispensation. So Isaiah, Jeremiah, and the prophets generally.
Is Christianity less stringent? It is now on the contrary that it becomes more
urgent and absolute. "If a man purge himself from these [the vessels to
dishonour], he shall be a vessel to honour." Put away the wicked (1 Cor.
5); if this be no longer possible, purge yourself out from them. There is
nothing man dreads and feels so deeply. You may protest, you may denounce, and
it will be borne by the world as long as you walk with it in the main; but
"he that departeth," now as ever, "maketh himself a prey."
Act on your convictions, and the most honeyed courtesy turns sour; your desire
to please God at all cost will be branded as pharisaical pride and exclusiveness.
It matters not how gently and lovingly you purge yourself from the vessels to
dishonour; the pain, the grievance, lies there, and nothing can sweeten it,
above all in the eyes of those it condemns. Indeed it is more felt, the more
graciously it is done, provided it be done thoroughly; for then evidently your
motive is not disappointed feeling but desire to be wholly subject to Christ,
with a heart perfectly happy in what they know nothing of and could not enjoy.
All this is an unpardonable affront in the world's eyes. Add
to this, that separation is claimed in 2 Tim. from the religious or Christian
world. "The Christian world!" what a phrase! what a contradiction! as
if there could be the smallest possible alliance between Christianity, which is
of heaven and Christ, and that outside world which crucified Him. No wonder
that in this epistle we read of perilous times in the last days. What greater
peril than, after they have known the truth, going back into substantially the
same conditions of evil as were found in the heathen world before Christianity
entered it. Compare 2 Tim. 3 with Rom. 1. How painful the resemblance! The
difference is, that some of the grosser characteristics of heathenism have been
replaced by subtler evil. The comparison is most instructive. In this state of
things the Christian profession is indeed a great house; and, as in such a
house there is that which is destined to the basest uses, no less than what is
for the best purposes, so in that great house which bears the name of Christ —
if you please, "the Christian world."
If there, what ought you to do? It is a solemn question for
the believer. He has no hesitation about the profane world; but the world
bearing the name of Christ is a difficulty to him. Seeing that the Christian
profession is there, am I not setting myself up and virtually condemning the
excellent of the earth? But will you name any evil thing that has not had a
good name attached to it? I do not speak now of such fatal poison as
Socinianism or the like; but take Romanism, or the Greek church, or even sects
known to be heretical, and yet by the malice of the enemy and the subtlety with
which he has concealed his work some children of God have been entangled. It is
too plain therefore that, whatever good men may do here or there, the only real
inquiry is as to the will of the Lord. It is not a question of making others
walk in your light, but you must not walk in their darkness. This is the
great point, not occupying ourselves with others, prescribing what they must
do, but feeling my own sin, as well as the common sin, yet by grace resolved at
all costs to be where I can honour and obey the Lord. Is not this a true plain
imperative duty, an undeniable principle of scripture, that commends itself to
your conscience? It may be that you do not act accordingly; but you cannot deny
that it is a right thing and what you ought to do.
10. Act on what you see from the word and trust the Lord for
what will follow.
But you are tied and have difficulties. Perhaps you have a
family and friends you cannot bear to grieve; perhaps you have hopes for your
children if not for yourself. Can a heart purified by faith thus set aside the
Lord's word? Do you think He does not know your wants and does not feel for
your family? You know the Lord loves yourself: cannot you trust Him for a
bit of bread? You, who are trusting Him for eternal life and for
heaven, cannot you trust Him to take care of you in the face of these trials
and obstacles of every day? Perhaps you are too comfortable, too anxious about
what is respectable for yourself and your children. Let the Lord deal with you;
I am sure He will not harm you, but only do what is most loving and tender
towards you and yours. Impossible for any heart to be beyond the Lord's love
and wisdom and generous considerate care. If you really believe in Him, why not
cleave to His word without compact or condition, and come forth at His bidding?
You do not know what the next steps may be. It is enough that you know you are
doing contrary to the word of God now. In vain we talk of loving, if we are not
prepared to follow His word. Do you say you do not know what next to do? The
Lord does not ask you: it is not His way to show all at once. Act on what you
see from the word, and trust the Lord for what will follow; He is worthy of
your confidence, and will give you more when you have taken the first step. But
leave for ever that which is condemned in God's word. "Remember Lot's
wife," and look not back, but go forth at His word wherever it points, and
you will find that "whosoever hath, to him shall be given." And as
regards the way, to the Lord rough or smooth is alike, deep or shallow, great
or small; it may make a great difference to you, but the greatest difficulties
only become the means of proving what the God is that we have found.
But there is more in 2 Tim. 2. Not only are you to separate,
or purge yourself, from these vessels of dishonour, but the word is, "Flee
also youthful lusts; but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them
that call on the Lord out of a pure heart." Thus there is no excuse for
isolation. Turn your back upon what you know is opposed to scripture. Have I to
demonstrate to any Christian that what is unscriptural is unholy? Have I to
urge that "to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is
sin?" If then you abandon what has no warrant from scripture, but on the
contrary is condemned by it, hear this word of God: "Follow righteousness,
faith, charity, peace." Follow them, not solitarily, but "with them
that call on the Lord out of a pure heart." What consolation, even if
there were but two or three! Are you afraid because there are only two or
three? God may act on hundreds or thousands: this is a matter for Him. You are
to follow the Lord's path through His word, with chastened spirit yet not
sadly, but full of joy and thankfulness, if you find ever so few who call upon
the Lord out of a pure heart. In other words, faith has a divine warrant to
expect companions in its path, though it lie now through the ruin of the Christian
profession. As it is imperative to turn away from all known evil, and there can
be no valid excuse for refusing God's call, so there is enjoined companionship
in following after righteousness, faith, charity, and peace, with such as call
upon the Lord out of a pure heart. May no hindrances nor dangers alarm, but
knowing that it is the Lord who has thus graciously thought of us, may you and
I and every one that loves that blessed name have unbroken confidence in Him!
He addresses Himself to hearts grieved in the midst of dishonour to His grace
and truth, and He has taken care to mark most distinctly the path not of
separation only but of association — the path of departure from evil and of
pursuing what is good.
11. There is only one gathering
center for all that call upon the Lord out of a pure heart.
How clearly the great moral principles of God remain in
spite of disorder! How the operations of His grace survive all ruin! Thus the
principle of the assembly of God abides in, it may be, only two or three
gathered to the name of the Lord. Thousands of Christians, in a national system
or in a dissenting sect, could not redeem their fundamental error; members of
Christ may be in them, but the principle of God's assembly is abandoned in
their very constitution. Let "two or three" come out at the word of
the Lord, making His name their centre, and owning the Spirit of God as in and
with them to guide them according to scripture; these, and these only, are
carrying out His mind in the real intelligence of the Holy Ghost. It is no
question of numbers, but of being gathered together, few or many, unto the name
of the Lord.
All here know what the House of Commons is. A hundred
members of that House might belong to the United Service Club or the Athenaeum
or anything else you please. These hundred members might discuss the measures
actually before the House in their club; but this could never make the club to
be the House; whereas in their true position with the Speaker in the midst a
much less number would constitute a House. It is exactly the same principle
here. What constitutes God's assembly? "Two or three" gathered unto
the Lord's name. He has been pleased to bring it down to the point described,
with the fullest possible stamp of His approval and authority.
On the other hand suppose ten thousand Christians meeting
simply as Christians — is that enough? I can conceive an assembly of
professing, yea, real Christians; and yet there would be no more reason to call
them God's assembly than to consider any number of members at their club the
House of Commons. It is not the fact of being Christians that constitutes God's
assembly, but their being gathered unto the name of the Lord. The practical
point for us is whether we are gathered to the name of Christians merely, or to
the name of Christ. If the former, you must accept of any evil thing into which
the enemy succeeds in dragging Christians. For if the man be a Christian, I
must receive him, spite of evil he is doing or sanctioning. But no! the
question is, Does he call upon the Lord out of a pure heart? The exclusion of
this word of God has widely overrun Christendom to the incalculable injury of
souls, and never more than now, when men practically put Christians in lieu of
Christ, the consequence of which is confusion and every evil work.
Whereas if the Lord have His place and be the centre to
which I come, I have then in His name a ground and rallying point to which I
can claim, with the most entire humility, every saint in the world — yea, I
could not and ought not to rest in my spirit as long as one that belongs to Him
is outside. What! even those under discipline, or avoided for grave causes?
Yes, every one; not of course to receive them with known evil upon them, but
yet to desire themselves, what is contrary to Christ being judged and removed.
12. Are there church associations
that are not based on and governed by the name of Christ?
The Lord make us steadfast and give us to feel that the
lowliest spirit becomes us! How can we boast of ceasing to do evil we ourselves
have done? May we look to Him increasingly! He who has brought us out has
compelled us to prove by our own difficulties the true state of the church; but
He has turned to profit our very mistakes, though in a humbling way. He has
used the storm, as it were, to purge the hazy air, and displayed more clearly
than ever the central place of His own name for our gathering together no less
than our salvation.
Thus we may leave all fears and anxieties. If the Lord be
our helper, why fear? What will man do? Then, as for charges of sectarianism or
presumption or disorder, it were easy indeed to show that those are really
guilty who are quick to raise and scatter them. We know that scripture condemns
every church association that is not based on and governed by the name of
Christ. It is not a mere question of wrongs here or there; but are they
Christians gathered to the name of Christ? Neither is it a question of the
amount of evil? for what did not slip in at Corinth through ignorance and
unwatchfulness? The refusal to judge known evil is no doubt fatal. But
supposing the absence of everything gross, the true question is, Are we where
the Lord would have us be? Then happy are we, if but "two or three"
thus: were we ten millions anywhere else, all must be wrong, because Christ is
not the acknowledged and exclusive centre ecclesiastically. He who is the only
adequate and rightful object for all the saints on earth deigns to be the
centre of but "two or three," as He says, that are "gathered
together unto his name."