CHAPTER 32
The
merchant fleet of the Fall of 1836 has filled the Marine Hospital of Quebec
with the victims of a ship-typhoid fever of the worst kind, which soon turned into
an epidemic. Within the walls of that institution Mr. Glackmeyer, the
superintendent, with two of the attending doctors, and the majority of the
servants were swept away during the winter months.
I was, in the spring of 1837, almost the only one spared by that horrible pest.
In order not to spread terror among the citizens of Quebec, the physicians and
I had determined to keep that a secret. But, at the end of May, I was forced to
reveal it to Bishop Signaie, of Quebec; for I felt in my whole frame the first
symptoms of the merciless disease. I prepared myself to die, as very few who
had been attacked by it had escaped. I went to the bishop, told him the truth
about the epidemic, and requested him to appoint a priest immediately, as
chaplain in my place; for, I added, "I feel the poison running through my
veins, and it is very probable that I have not more than ten or twelve days to
live."
The young Mons. D. Estimanville was chosen, and though I felt very weak, I
thought it was my duty to initiate him in his new and perilous work. I took him
immediately to the hospital, where he never had been before, and when at a few
feet from the door, I said: "My young friend, it is my duty to tell you
that there is a dangerous epidemic raging in that house since last Fall,
nothing has been able to stop it. The superintendent, two physicians, and most
of the servants have been its victims. My escape till now is almost miraculous.
But these last ten hours I feel the poison running through my whole body. You
are called by God to take my place; but before you cross the threshold of that
hospital, you must make the generous sacrifice of your life; for you are going
on the battle-field from which only few have come out with their lives."
The young priest turned pale, and said, "Is it possible that such a deadly
epidemic is raging where you are taking me?" I answered, "Yes; my
dear young brother, it is a fact, and I consider it my duty to tell you not to
enter that house, if you are afraid to die!" A few minutes of silence followed,
and it was a solemn silence indeed! He then took his handkerchief and wiped
away some big drops of sweat which were rolling from his forehead on his
cheeks, and said: "Is there a more holy and desirable way of dying than in
ministering to the spiritual and temporal wants of my brethren? No! If it is
the will of God that I should fall when fighting at this post of danger, I am
ready. Let His holy will be done."
He followed me into the pestilential house with the heroic step of the soldier
who runs at the command of his general to storm an impregnable citadel when he
is sure to fall. It took me more than an hour to show him all the rooms, and
introduce him to the poor, sick, and dying mariners.
I felt then so exhausted that two friends had to support me on my return to the
parsonage of St. Roche. My physicians were immediately called (one of them, Dr.
Rosseau, is still living), and soon pronounced my case so dangerous that three
other physicians were called in consultation. For nine days I suffered the most
horrible tortures in my brains, and the very marrow of my bones, from the fever
which so devoured my flesh as to seemingly leave but the skin. On the ninth
day, the physicians told the bishop who had visited me, that there was no hope
of my recovery. The last sacraments were administered tome, and I prepared
myself to die, as taught by the Church of Rome. The tenth day I was absolutely
motionless, and not able to utter a word. My tongue was parched like a piece of
dry wood.
Through the terrible ravage on the whole system, my very eyes were so turned
inside their orbits, the white part only could be seen; no food could be taken
from the beginning of he sickness, except a few drops of cold water, which were
dropped through my teeth with much difficulty. But though all my physical
faculties seemed dead, my memory, intelligence, and soul were full of life, and
acting with more power than ever. Now and then, in the paroxysms of the fever,
I used to see awful visions. At one time, suspended by a thread at the top of a
high mountain, with my head down over a bottomless abyss; at another,
surrounded by merciless enemies, whose daggers and swords were plunged through
my body. But these were of short duration, though they have left such an
impression on my mind that I still remember the minutest details. Death had, at
first, no terror for me. I had done, to the best of my ability, all that my
Church had told me to do, to be saved. I had, every day, given my last cent to
the poor, fasted and done penance almost enough to kill myself; made my
confessions with the greatest care and sincerity; preached with such zeal and
earnestness as to fill the whole city with admiration.
My pharisaical virtues and holiness, in a word, were of such a glaring and
deceitful character, and my ecclesiastical superiors were so taken by them,
that they made the greatest efforts to persuade me to become the first Bishop
of Oregon and Vancouver.
One after the other, all the saints of heaven, beginning with the Holy Virgin
Mary, were invoked by me that they might pray God to look down upon me in mercy
and save my soul. On the thirteenth night, as the doctors were retiring, they
whispered to the Revs. Balillargeon and Parent, who were at my bedside:
"He is dead, or if not, he has only a few minutes to live. He is already
cold and breathless, and we cannot feel his pulse." Though these words had
been said in a very low tone, they fell upon my ears as a peal of thunder. The
two young priests, who were my devoted friends, filled the room with such cries
that the curate and the priest who had gone to rest, rushed to my room and
mingled their tears and cries with theirs.
The words of the doctor, "He is dead!" were ringing in my ears as the
voice of a hurricane. I suddenly saw that I was in danger of being buried
alive; no words can express the sense of horror I felt at that idea. A cold icy
wave began to move slowly, but it seemed to me, with irresistible force, from
the extremities of my feet and hands towards the heart, as the first symptoms of
approaching death. At that moment I made a great effort to see what hope I
might have of being saved, invoking the help of the blessed Virgin Mary. With
lightning rapidity, a terrible vision struck my mind; I saw all my good works
and penances, in which my Church had told me to trust for salvation, in the
balance of the justice of God. These were in one side of the scales, and my
sins on the other. My good works seemed only as a grain of sand compared with
the weight of my sins.
This awful vision entirely destroyed my false and pharisaical security, and
filled my soul with an unspeakable terror. I could not cry to Jesus Christ, nor
to God, His Father, for mercy; for I sincerely believed what my Church had
taught me on that subject, that they were both angry with me on account of my
sins. With much anxiety I turned my thoughts, my soul, and hopes, towards St.
Anne and St. Philomene. The first was the object of my confidence, since the
first time I had seen the numberless crutches and other "Fx Votis"
which covered the church of "La Bonne St. Anne du Nord," and the
second was the saint a la mode. It was said that her body had lately been
miraculously discovered, and the world was filled with the noise of the
miracles wrought through her intercession. Her medals were on every breast, her
pictures in every house, and her name on all lips. With entire confidence in
the will and power of these two saints to obtain any favour for me, I invoked
them to pray God to grant me a few years more of life; and with the utmost
honesty of purpose, I promised to add to my penances, and to live a more holy
life, by consecrating myself with more zeal than ever to the service of the
poor and the sick. I added to my former prayer the solemn promise to have a
painting of the two saints put in St. Anne's Church, to proclaim to the end of
the world their great power in heaven, if they would obtain my cure and restore
my health. Strange to say! The last words of my prayer were scarcely uttered,
when I saw above my head St. Anne and St. Philomene sitting in the midst of a
great light, on a beautiful golden cloud. St. Anne was very old and grave, but
St. Philomene was very young and beautiful. Both were looking at me with great
kindness.
However, the kindness of St. Anne was mixed with such an air of awe and gravity
that I did not like her looks; while St. Philomene had such an expression of
superhuman love and kindness that I felt myself drawn to here by a magnetic
power, when she said, distinctly: "You will be cured," and the vision
disappeared.
But I was cured, perfectly cured! At the disappearance of the two saints, I
felt as though an electric shock went through my whole frame; the pains were
gone, the tongue was untied, the nerves were restored to their natural and
usual power; my eyes were opened, the cold and icy waves which were fast going
from the extremities to the regions of my heart, seemed to be changed into a
most pleasant warm bath, restoring life and strength to every part of my body.
I raised my head, stretched out my hands, which I had not moved for three days,
and looking around, I saw the four priests. I said to them: "I am cured,
please give me something to eat, I am hungry."
Astonished beyond measure, two of them threw their arms around my shoulders to
help me to sit a moment, and change my pillow; when two others ran to the
table, which the kind nuns of Quebec had covered with delicacies in case I
might want them. Their joy was mixed with fear, for they all confessed to me
afterwards that they had at once thought that all this was nothing but the last
brilliant flash of light which the flickering lamp gives before dying away. But
they soon changed their minds when they saw that I was eating ravenously, and
that I was speaking to them and thanking God with a cheerful, though very
feeble voice. "What does this mean?" they all said. "The doctors
told us last evening that you were dead; and we have passed the night not only
weeping over your death, but praying for your soul, to rescue it from the
flames of purgatory, and now you look so hungry, so cheerful and well."
I answered: "It means that I was not dead, but very near dying, and when I
felt that I was to die, I prayed to St. Anne and St. Philomene to come to my
help and cure me; and they have come. I have seen them both, there above my
head. Ah! if I were a painter, what a beautiful picture I could make of that
dear old St. Anne and the still dearer Philomene! for it is St. Philomene who
has spoken to me as the messenger of the mercies of God. I have promised to
have their portraits painted and put into the church of The Good St. Anne du
Nord."
While I was speaking thus, the priests, filled with admiration and awe, were
mute; they could not speak except with tears of gratitude. They honestly
believed with me that my cure was miraculous, and consented with pleasure to
sing that beautiful hymn of gratitude, the "Te Deum."
The next morning, the news of my miraculous cure spread through the whole city
with the rapidity of lightning, for besides a good number of the first citizens
of Quebec who were related to me by blood, I had not less than 1,800 penitents
who loved and respected me as their spiritual father.
To give an idea of the kind of interest of the numberless friends whom God had
given me when in Quebec, I will relate a single fact. The citizens who were
near our parsonage, having been told, by a physician, that the inflammation of
my brain was so terrible that the least noise, even the passing of carriages or
the walking of horses on the streets, was causing me real torture, they
immediately covered all the surrounding streets with several inches of straw to
prevent the possibility of any more noise.
The physicians, having heard of my sudden cure, hastened to come and see what
it meant. At first, they could scarcely believe their eyes. The night before
they had given me up for dead, after thirteen days' suffering with the most
horrible and incurable of diseases! And, there I was, the very next morning,
perfectly cured! No more pain, not the least remnant of fever, all the
faculties of my body and mind perfectly restored! They minutely asked me all
the circumstances connected with that strange, unexpected cure; and I told them
simply but plainly, how, at the very moment I expected to die, I had fervently
prayed to St. Anne and St. Philomene, and how they had come, spoken to me and
cured me. Two of my physicians were Roman Catholics, and three Protestants.
They at first looked at each other without saying a word. It was evident they
were not all partakers of my strong faith in the power of the two saints. While
the Roman Catholic doctors, Messrs. Parent and Rousseau, seemed to believe in
my miraculous cure, the Protestants energetically protested against that view
in the name of science and common sense.
Dr. Douglas put me the following questions, and received the following answers.
He said:
"Dear Father Chiniquy, you know you have not a more devoted friend in
Quebec than I, and you know me too well to suspect that I want to hurt your
religious feelings when I tell you that there is not the least appearance of a
miracle in your so happy and sudden cure. If you will be kind enough to answer
my questions, you will see that you are mistaken in attributing to a miracle a
thing which is most common and natural. Though you are perfectly cured, you are
very weak; please answer only 'yes' or 'no' to my questions, in order not to
exhaust yourself. Will you be so kind as to tell us if this is the first vision
you have had during the period of that terrible fever?"
Ans. "I have had many other visions, but I took them as being the effect
of the fever."
Doctor. "Please make your answers shorter, or else I will not ask you
another question, for it would hurt you. Tell us simply, if you have not seen
in those visions, at times, very frightful and terrible, and at others, very
beautiful things."
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "Have not those visions stamped themselves on your mind with such
a power and vividness that you never forget them, and that you deem them more
realities than mere visions of a sickly brain?"
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "Did you not feel sometimes much worse, and sometimes much better
after those visions, according to their nature?"
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "When at ease in your mind during that disease, were you not used to
pray to the saints, particularly to St. Anne and St. Philomene."
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "When you considered that death was very near (and it was indeed)
when you had heard my imprudent sentence that you had only a few minutes to
live, were you not taken suddenly, by such a fear of death as you never felt
before?"
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "Did you not then make a great effort to repel death from
you?"
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "Do you know that you are a man of an exceedingly strong will, and
that very few men can resist you when you want to do something? Do you not know
that your will is such an exceptional power that mountains of difficulties have
disappeared before you, here in Quebec? Have you not seen even me, with many
others, yielding to your will almost in spite of ourselves, to do what you
wanted?"
With a smile I answered, "Yes, sir."
Doctor. "Do you not remember seeing, many times, people suffering
dreadfully from toothache coming to us to have their teeth extracted, who were
suddenly cured at the sight of the knives and other surgical instruments we put
upon the table to use?"
I answered with a laugh, "Yes, sir. I have seen that very often, and it
has occurred to me once."
Doctor. "Do you think that there was a supernatural power, then, in the
surgical implements, and that those sudden cures of toothache were
miraculous?"
Ans. "No, sir!"
Doctor. "Have you not read the volume of the 'Medical Directory' I lent
you on typhoid fever, where several cures exactly like yours are
reported?"
Ans. "Yes, sir."
Then addressing the physicians, Doctor Douglas said to them:
"We must not exhaust our dear Father Chiniquy. We are too happy to see him
full of life again, but from his answers you understand that there is no
miracle here. His happy and sudden cure is a very natural and common thing. The
vision was what we call the turning-point of the disease, when the mind is
powerfully bent on some very exciting object, when that mysterious thing of
which we know so little as yet, called the will, the spirit, the soul, fights
as a giant against death, in which battle, pains, diseases, and even death are
put to flight and conquered.
"My dear Father Chiniquy, from your own lips, we have it; you have fought,
last night, the fever and approaching death, as a giant. No wonder that you won
the victory, and I confess, it is a great victory. I know it is not the first
victory you have gained, and I am sure it will not be the last. It is surely
God who has given you that irresistible will. In that sense only does your cure
come from Him. Continue to fight and conquer as you have done last night, and
you will live a long life. Death will long remember its defeat of last night,
and will not dare approach you any more, except when you will be so old that
you will ask it to come as a friend to put an end to the miseries of this
present life. Good-bye."
And with friendly smiles, all the doctors pressed my hand and left me just as
the bishop and curate of Quebec, Mons. Ballargeon, my confessor, were entering
the room.
An old proverb says: "There is nothing so difficult as to persuade a man
who does not want to be persuaded." Though the reasoning and kind words of
the doctor ought to have been gladly listened to by me, they had only bothered
me. It was infinitely more pleasant, and it seemed then, more agreeable to God,
and more according to my faith in the power of the saints in heaven, to believe
that I had been miraculously cured. Of course, the bishop, with his coadjutor
and my Lord Turgeon, as well as my confessor, with the numberless priests and
Roman Catholics who visited me during my convalescence, confirmed me in my
views.
The skillful painter, Mr. Plamonon, recently from Rome, was called and painted,
at the price of two hundred dollars ($200) the tableau I had promised to put in
the church of St. Anne du Nord. It was one of the most beautiful and remarkable
paintings of that artist, who had passed several years in the Capital of Fine
Arts in Italy, where he had gained a very good reputation for his ability.
Three months after my recovery, I was at the parsonage of the curate of St.
Anne, the Rev. Mr. Ranvoize, a relative of mine. He was about sixtyfive years
of age, very rich, and had a magnificent library. When young, he had enjoyed
the reputation of being one of the best preachers in Canada. Never had I been
so saddened and scandalized as I was by him on this occasion. It was evening
when I arrived with my tableau. As soon as we were left alone, the old curate
said: "Is it possible, my dear young cousin, that you will make such a
fool of yourself tomorrow? That socalled miraculous cure is nothing but
'naturoe suprema vis,' as the learned of all ages have called it. Your
so-called vision was a dream of your sickly brain, as it generally occurs in
the moment of the supreme crisis of the fever. It is what is called 'the
turning-point' of the disease, when a desperate effort of nature kills or cures
the patient. As for the vision of that beautiful girl, whom you call St.
Philomene, who had done you so much good, she is not the first girl, surely,
who has come to you in your dreams, and done you good!" At these words he
laughed so heartily that I feared he would split his sides. Twice he repeated
this unbecoming joke.
I was, at first, so shocked at this unexpected rebuke, which I considered as
bordering on blasphemy, that I came very near taking my hat without answering a
word, to go and spend the night at his brother's; but after a moment's
reflection, I said to him: "How can you speak with such levity on so solemn
a thing? Do you not believe in the power of the saints, who being more holy and
pure than we are, see God face to face, speak to Him and obtain favours which
He would refuse us rebels? Are you not the daily witness of the miraculous
cures wrought in your own church, under your own eyes? Why those thousands of
crutches which literally cover the walls of your church?" My strong
credulity, and the earnestness of my appeal to the daily miracles of which he
was the witness, and above all, the mention of the numberless crutches
suspended all over the walls of his church, brought again from him such a
Homeric laugh, that I was disconcerted and saddened beyond measure. I remained
absolutely mute; I wished I had never come into such company.
When he had laughed at me to his heart's content, he said: "My dear
cousin, you are the first one to whom I speak in this way. I do it because,
first: I consider you a man of intelligence, and hope you will understand me.
Secondly: because you are my cousin. Were you one of those idiotic priests,
real blockheads, who form the clergy today; or, were you a stranger to me, I
would let you go your way, and believe in those ridiculous, degrading
superstitions of our poor ignorant and blind people, but I know you from your
infancy, and I have known your father, who was one of my dearest friends; the
blood which flows in your veins, passes thousands of times every day through my
heart. You are very young and I am old. It is a duty of honour and conscience
in me to reveal to you a thing which I have thought better to keep till now, a
secret between God and myself. I have been here more than thirty years, and
though our country is constantly filled with the noise of the great and small
miracles wrought in my church every day, I am ready to swear before God, and to
prove to any man of common sense, that not a single miracle has been wrought in
my church since I have come here. Every one of the facts given to the Canadian
people as miraculous cures are sheer impositions, deceptions, the work of either
fools, or the work of skillful impostors and hypocrites, whether priests or
laymen. Believe me, my dear cousin, I have studied carefully the history of all
those crutches. Ninety-nine out of a hundred have been left by poor, lazy
beggars, who, at first, thought with good reason that by walking from door to
door with one or two crutches, they would create more sympathy and bring more
into their purses; for how many will indignantly turn out of doors a lazy,
strong and healthful beggar, who will feel great compassion, and give largely
to a man who is crippled, unable to work, and forced to drag himself painfully
on crutches? Those crutches are then passports from door to door, they are the
very keys to open both the hearts and purses. But the day comes when that
beggar has bought a pretty good farm with his stolen alms; or when he is really
tired, disgusted with his crutches and wants to get rid of them! How can he do
that without compromising himself? By a miracle! Then he will sometimes travel
again hundreds of miles from door to door, begging as usual, but this time he
asks the prayers of the whole family, saying: 'I am going to the "good St.
Anne du Nord" to ask her to cure my leg (or legs). I hope she will cure
me, as she had cured so many others. I have great confidence in her power!'
Each one gives twice, nay, ten times as much as before to the poor cripple,
making him promise that if he is cured, he will come back and show himself,
that they may bless the good St. Anne with him. When he arrives here, he gives
me sometimes one, sometimes five dollars, to say mass for him. I take the
money, for I would be a fool to refuse it when I know that his purse has been
so well filled. During the celebration of the mass, when he receives the
communion, I hear generally, a great noise, cries of joy! A miracle! A
miracle!! The crutches are thrown on the floor, and the cripple walks well as
you or I! And the last act of that religious comedy is the most lucrative one,
for he fulfill his promise of stopping at every house he had ever been seen
with his crutches. He narrates how he was miraculously cured, how his feet and
legs became suddenly all right. Tears of joy and admiration flow from eye to
eye. The last cent of that family is generally given to the impostor, who soon
grows rich at the expense of his dupes. This is the plain but true story of
ninety-nine out of every hundred of the cures wrought in my church. The
hundredth, is upon people as honest, but, pardon me the expression, as blind
and superstitious as you are; they are really cured, for they were really sick.
But their cures are the natural effects of the great effort of the will. It is
the result of a happy combination of natural causes which work together on the
frame, and kill the pain, expel the disease and restore the health, just as I
was cured of a most horrible toothache, some years ago. In the paroxysm I went
to the dentist and requested him to extract the affected tooth. Hardly had his
knife and other surgical instruments come before my eyes than the pain
disappeared. I quietly took my hat and left, bidding a hearty 'good-bye' to the
dentist, who laughed at me every time we met, to his heart's content.
"One of the weakest points of our religion is in the ridiculous, I venture
to say, diabolical miracles, performed and believed every day among us, with
the so-called relics and bones of the saints. But, don't you know that, for the
most part, these relics are nothing but chickens' or sheeps' bones. And what
could I not say, were I to tell you what I know of the daily miraculous
impostures of the scapulars, holy water, chaplets and medals of every kind.
Were I a pope, I would throw all these mummeries, which come from paganism, to
the bottom of the sea, and would present to the eyes of the sinners, nothing
but Christ and Him crucified as the object of their faith, invocation and hope,
for this life and the next, just as the Apostles Paul, Peter and James do in
their Epistles."
I cannot repeat here, all that I heard that night from that old relative, against
the miracles, relics, scapulars, purgatory, false saints and ridiculous
practices of the Church of Rome. It would take too long, for he spoke three
hours as a real Protestant. Sometimes what he said seemed to me according to
common sense, but as it was against the practices of my church, and against my
personal practices, I was exceedingly scandalized and pained, and not at all
convinced. I pitied him for having lost his former faith and piety. I told him
at the end, without ceremony: "I heard, long ago, that the bishops did not
like you, but I knew not why. However, if they could hear what you think and
say here about the miracles of St. Anne, they would surely interdict you."
'Will you betray me?" he added, "and will you report our conversation
to the bishop?" "No," my cousin, " I replied, "I would
prefer to be burnt to ashes. I will not sell your kind hospitality for the
traitor's money." It was two o'clock in the morning when we parted to go
to our sleeping rooms. But that night was again a sleepless one to me. Was it
not too sad and strange for me to see that that old and learned priest was
secretly a Protestant!
The next morning the crowds began to arrive, not by hundreds, but by thousands,
from the surrounding parishes. The channel between "L'Isle d'Orleans"
and St. Anne, was literally covered with boats of every size, laden with men
and women who wanted to hear from my own lips, the history of my miraculous
cure, and see, with their own eyes, the picture of the two saints who had
appeared to me. At ten a.m., more than 10,000 people were crowded inside and
outside the wall of the church.
No words can give an idea of my emotion and of the emotion of the multitude
when, after telling them in a single and plain way, what I then considered a
miraculous fact, I disclosed the picture, and presented it to their admiration
and worship. There were tears rolling on every cheek and cries of admiration
and joy from every lip. The picture represented me dying in my bed of
sufferings, and the two saints seen at a distance above me and stretching their
hands as if to say: "You will be cured." It was hung on the walls, in
a conspicuous place, where thousands and thousands have come to worship it from
that day to the year 1858, when the curate was ordered by the bishop to burn
it, for it had pleased our merciful God that very year, to take away the scales
which were on my eyes and show me His saving light, and I had published all
over Canada, my terrible, though unintentional error, in believing in that
false miracle. I was so honest in my belief in a miraculous cure, and the
apparition of the two saints had left such a deep impression on my mind, that,
I confess it to my shame, the first week after my conversion, I very often said
to myself: "How is it that I now believe that the Church of Rome is false,
when such a miracle has been wrought on me as one of her priests?" But,
our God, whose mercies are infinite, knowing my honesty when a slave of Popery,
was determined to give me the full understanding of my errors in this way.
About a month after my conversion, in 1858, I had to visit a dying Irish
convert from Romanism, who had caught in Chicago, the same fever which so
nearly killed me at the Marine Hospital of Quebec. I again caught the disease,
and during twelve days, passed through the same tortures and suffered the same
agonies as in 1837. But this time, I was really happy to die; there was no fear
for me to see the good works as a grain of sand in my favour, and the mountains
of my iniquities in the balance of God against me. I had just given up my
pharisaical holiness of old; it was no more in my good works, my alms, my
penances, my personal efforts, I was trusting to be saved; it was in Jesus
alone. My good works were no more put by me in the balance of the justice of
God to pay my debts, and to appeal for mercy. It was the blood of Jesus, the
Lamb slain from the foundation of the world for me, which was in the balance.
It was the tears of Jesus, the nails, the crown of thorns, the heavy cross, the
cruel death of Jesus only, which was there to pay my debts and to cry for
mercy. I had no fear then, for I knew that I was saved by Jesus, and that that
salvation was a perfect act of His love, His mercy, and His power; consequently
I was glad to die.
But when the doctor had left me, the thirteenth day of my sufferings, saying
the very same words of the doctors of Quebec: "He had only a few minutes
to live, if he be not already dead," the kind friends who were around my
bed, filled the room with their cries! Although for three or four days I had
not moved a finger, said a single word, or given any sign of life, I was
perfectly conscious. I had heard the words of the doctor, and I was glad to
exchange the miseries of this short life for that eternity of glory which my Saviour
had bought for me. I only regretted to die before bringing more of my dear
countrymen out of the idolatrous religion of Rome, and from the lips of my
soul, I said: "Dear Jesus, I am glad to go with Thee just now, but if it
be Thy will to let me live a few years more, that I may spread the light of the
Gospel among my countrymen; grant me to live a few years more, and I will bless
Thee eternally, with my converted countrymen, for Thy mercy." This prayer
had scarcely reached the mercy-seat, when I saw a dozen bishops marching toward
me, sword in hand to kill me. As the first sword raised to strike was coming
down to split my head, I made a desperate effort, wrenched it from the hand of
my would-be murderer, and struck such a blow on his neck that his head rolled
on to the floor. The second, third, fourth, and so on to the last, rushed to
kill me; but I struck such terrible blows on the necks of every one of them,
that twelve heads were rolling on the floor and swimming in a pool of blood. In
my excitement I cried to my friends around me: "Do you not see the heads
rolling and the blood flowing on the floor?"
And suddenly I felt a kind of electric shock from head to foot. I was cured!
perfectly cured!! I asked my friends for something to eat; I had not taken any
food for twelve days. And with tears of joy and gratitude to God, they complied
with my request. This last was not only the perfect cure of the body, but it
was a perfect cure of the soul. I understood then clearly that the first was
not more miraculous than the second. I had a perfect understanding of the
diabolical forgeries and miracles of Rome. It was in both cases, I was not
cured or saved by the saints, the bishops or the Popes, but by my God, through
His Son Jesus.
.
CHAPTER 33
The
21st of September, 1833, was a day of desolation to me. On that day I received
the letter of my bishop appointing me curate of Beauport. Many times, I had
said to the other priests, when talking about our choice of the different
parishes, that I would never consent to be curate of Beauport. That parish,
which is a kind of suburb of Quebec, was too justly considered the very nest of
the drunkards of Canada. With a soil of unsurpassed fertility, inexhaustible
lime quarries, gardens covered with most precious vegetables and fruits,
forests near at hand, to furnish wood to the city of Quebec, at their doors,
the people of Beauport, were, nevertheless, classed among the poorest, most
ragged and wretched people of Canada. For almost every cent they were getting
at the market went into the hands of the saloon-keepers. Hundreds of times I
had seen the streets which led from St. Roch to the upper town of Quebec almost
impassable, when the drunkards of Beauport were leaving the market to go home.
How many times I heard them fill the air with their cries and blasphemies; and
saw the streets reddened with their blood when fighting with one another, like
mad dogs!
The Rev. Mr. Begin, who was their cure since 1825, had accepted the moral
principles of the great Roman Catholic theologian Liguori, who says, "that
a man is not guilty of the sin of drunkenness, so long as he can distinguish
between a small pin and a load of hay." Of course the people would not
find themselves guilty of sin, so long as their eyes could make that distinction.
After weeping to my heart's content at the reading of the letter from my
bishop, which had come to me as a thunderbolt, my first thought was that my
misfortune, though very great, was not irretrievable. I knew that there were
many priests who were as anxious to become curates of Beauport as I was opposed
to it. My hope was that the bishop would be touched by my tears, if not
convinced by my arguments, and that he would not persist in putting on my
shoulders a burden which they could not carry. I immediately went to the
palace, and did all in my power to persuade his lordship to select another
priest for Beauport. He listened to my arguments with a great deal of patience
and kindness, and answered:
"My dear Mr. Chiniquy, you forget too often, that 'implicit and perfect
obedience to his superiors is the virtue of a good priest. You have given me a
great deal of trouble and disappointment by refusing to relieve the good bishop
Provencher of his too heavy burden. It was at my suggestion, you know very
well, that he had selected you to be his coworker along the coasts of the
Pacific, by consenting to become the first Bishop of Oregon. Your obstinate
resistance to your superiors in that circumstance, and in several other cases,
is one of your weak points. If you continue to follow your own mind rather than
obey those whom God has chosen to guide you, I really fear for your future. I
have already too often yielded to your rebellious character. Through respect to
myself, and for your own good, today I must force you to obey me. You have
spoken of the drunkenness of the people of Beauport, as one of the reasons why
I should not put you at the head of that parish; but this is just one of the
reasons why I have chosen you. You are the only priest I know, in my diocese,
able to struggle against the long-rotted and detestable evil, with a hope of
success.
"'Quod scriptum scriptum est.' Your name is entered in our official
registers as the curate of Beauport; it will remain there till I find better
reasons than those you have given me to change my mind. After all, you cannot
complain; Beauport is not only one of the most beautiful parishes of Canada,
but it is one of the most splendid spots in the world. It is, besides, a parish
which gives great revenues to its curate. In your beautiful parsonage, at the
door of the old capital of Canada, you will have the privileges of the city,
and the enjoyments of some of the most splendid sceneries of this continent. If
you are not satisfied with me today, I do not know what I can do to please
you."
Though far from being reconciled to my new position, I saw there was no help; I
had to obey, as my predecessor, Mr. Begin, was to sell all his house furniture,
before taking charge of his far distant parish, La Riviere Ouelle, he kindly invited
me to go and buy, on long credit, what I wished for my own use, which I did.
The whole parish was on the spot long before me, partly to show their friendly
sympathy for their last pastor, and partly to see their new curate. I was not
long in the crowd without seeing that my small stature and my leanness were
making a very bad impression on the people, who were accustomed to pay their
respects to a comparatively tall man, whose large and square shoulders were
putting me in the shade. Many jovial remarks, though made in halfsuppressed
tones, came to my ears, to tell me that I was cutting a poor figure by the side
of my jolly predecessor.
"He is hardly bigger than my tobacco box," said one not far from me:
"I think I could put him in my vest pocket."
"Has he not the appearance of a salted sardine!" whispered a woman to
her neighbour, with a hearty laugh.
Had I been a little wiser, I could have redeemed myself by some amiable or
funny words, which would have sounded pleasantly in the ears of my new parishioners.
But, unfortunately for me, that wisdom is not among the gifts I received. After
a couple of hours of auction, a large cloth was suddenly removed from a long
table, and presented to our sight an incredible number of wine and beer
glasses, of empty decanters and bottles, of all sizes and quality. This brought
a burst of laughter and clapping of hands from almost every one. All eyes were
turned towards me, and I heard from hundreds of lips: "This is for you,
Mr. Chiniquy." Without weighing my words, I instantly answered: "I do
not come to Beauport to buy wine glasses and bottles, but to break them."
These words fell upon their ears as a spark of fire on a train of powder.
Nine-tenths of that multitude, without being very drunk, had emptied from four
to ten glasses of beer or rum, which Rev. Mr. Begin himself was offering them
in a corner of the parsonage. A real deluge of insults and cursings overwhelmed
me; and I soon saw that the best thing I could do was to leave the place
without noise, and by the shortest way.
I immediately went to the bishop's place, to try again to persuade his lordship
to put another curate at the head of such a people. "You see, my
lord," I said, "that by my indiscreet and rash answer I have for ever
lost the respect and confidence of that people. They already hate me; their
brutal cursings have fallen upon me like balls of fire. I prefer to be carried
to my grave next Sabbath, than have to address such a degraded people. I feel
that I have neither the moral nor the physical power to do any good
there."
"I differ from you," replied the bishop. "Evidently the people
wanted to try your mettle, by inviting you to buy those glasses, and you would
have lost yourself by yielding to their desire. Now they have seen that you are
brave and fearless. It is just what the people of Beauport want; I have known
them for a long time. It is true that they are drunkards; but, apart from that
vice, there is not a nobler people under heaven. They have, literally, no
education, but they possess marvelous common sense, and have many noble and
redeeming qualities, which you will soon find out. You took them by surprise
when you boldly said you wanted to break their glasses and decanters. Believe
me, they will bless you, if by the grace of God, you fulfill your prophecy;
though it will be a miracle if you succeed in making the people of Beauport
sober. But you must not despair. Trust in God; fight as a good soldier, and
Jesus Christ will win the victory." Those kind words of my bishop did me
good, though I would have preferred being sent to the backwoods of Canada, than
to the great parish of Beauport. I felt that the only thing that I had to do
was to trust in God for success, and to fight as if I were to gain the day. It
came to my mind that I had committed a great sin by obstinately refusing to
become Bishop of Oregon, and my God, as a punishment, had given me the very
parish for which I felt an almost insurmountable repugnance.
Next Sunday was a splendid day, and the church of Beauport was filled to its
utmost capacity by the people, eager to see and hear, for the first time, their
new pastor. I had spent the last three days in prayers and fastings. God knows
that never a priest, nor any minister of the Gospel, ascended the pulpit with
more exalted views of his sublime functions than I did that day, and never a
messenger of the Gospel had been more terrified than I was, when in that
pulpit, by the consciousness of his own demerits, inability and incompetency,
in the face of the tremendous responsibilities of his position. My first sermon
was on the text: "Woe is unto me, if I preach not the Gospel" (1 Cor.
ix. 16). With a soul and heart filled with the profoundest emotions, a voice
many times suffocated by uncontrollable sobs, I expounded to them some of the
awful responsibilities of a pastor. The effect of the sermon was felt to the
last day of my priestly ministry in Beauport.
After the sermon, I told them: "I have a favour to ask of you. As it is
the first, I hope you will not rebuke me. I have just now given you some of the
duties of your poor young curate towards you; I want you to come again this
afternoon at half-past two o'clock, that I may give you some of your duties
towards your pastor." At the appointed hour the church was still more crowded
than in the morning, and it seemed to me that my merciful God blessed still
more that second address than the first.
The text was: "When he (the shepherd) putteth forth his own sheep, he
goeth before them, and the sheep follow him; for they know his voice"
(Jno. x. 4).
Those two sermons on the Sabbath were a startling innovation in the Roman
Catholic Church of Canada, which brought upon me, at once, many bitter remarks
from the bishop and surrounding curates. Their unanimous verdict was that I
wanted to become a little reformer. They had not the least doubt that in my
pride I wanted to show the people "that I was the most zealous priest of
the country." This was not only whispered from ear to ear among the
clergy, but several times it was thrown into my face in the most insulting
manner. However, my God knew that my only motives were, first, to keep my
people away from the taverns, by having them before their altars during the
greatest part of the Sabbath day; second, to impress more on their minds the great
saving and regenerating truths I preached, by presenting them twice in the same
day under different aspects. I found such benefits from those two sermons, that
I continued the practice during the four years I remained in Beauport, though I
had to suffer and hear, in silence, many humiliating and cutting remarks from
many co-priests.
I had not been more than three months at the head of that parish, when I
determined to organize a temperance society on the same principles as Father
Mathew, in Ireland. I opened my mind, at first, on that subject to the bishop,
with the hope that he would throw the influence of his position in favour of
the new association, but, to my great dismay and surprise, not only did he turn
my project into ridicule, but absolutely forbade me to think any more of such
an innovation. "These temperance societies are a Protestant scheme,"
he said. "Preach against drunkenness, but let the respectable people who
are not drunkards alone. St. Paul advised his disciple Timothy to drink wine.
Do not try to be more zealous than they were in those apostolic days."
I left the bishop much disappointed, but did not give up my plan. It seemed to
me if I could gain the neighbouring priests to join with me in my crusade I
wanted to preach against the usage of intoxicating drinks, we might bring about
a glorious reform in Canada, as Father Mathew was doing in Ireland. But the
priests, without a single exception, laughed at me, turned my plans into
ridicule, and requested me, in the name of common sense, never to speak any
more to them of giving up their social glass of wine. I shall never be able to
give any idea of my sadness, when I saw that I was to be opposed by my bishop
and the whole clergy in the reform which I considered then, more and more every
day, the only plank of salvation, not only of my dear people of Beauport, but
of all Canada. God only knows the tears I shed, the long sleepless nights I
have passed in studying, praying, meditating on that great work of Beauport. I
had recourse to all the saints of heaven for more strength and light; for I was
determined, at any cost, to try and form a temperance society. But every time I
wanted to begin, I was frightened by the idea, not only of the wrath of the
whole clergy, which would hunt me down, but still more of the ridicule of the
whole country, which would overwhelm me in case of a failure. In these
perplexities, I thought I would do well to write to Father Mathew and ask him
his advice and the help of his prayers. That noble apostle of temperance of
Ireland answered me in an eloquent letter, and pressed me to begin the work in
Canada as he had done in Ireland, relying on God, without paying any attention
to the opposition of man.
The wise and Christian words of that great and worthy Irish priest, came to me
as the voice of God; and I determined to begin the work at once, though the
whole world should be against me. I felt that if God was in my favour, I would
succeed in reforming my parish and my country in spite of all the priests and
bishops of the world, and I was right. Before putting the plough into the
ground, I had not only prayed to God and all His saints, almost day and night,
during many months, but I had studied all the best books written in England,
France and the United States, on the evils wrought by the use of intoxicating
drinks. I had taken a pretty good course of anatomy in the Marine Hospital
under the learned Dr. Douglas.
I was then well posted on the great subject I was to bring before my country. I
knew the enemy I was to attack. And the weapons which would give him the death
blow were in my hands. I only wanted my God to strengthen my hands and direct
my blows. I prayed to Him, and in His great mercy He heard me.
.
CHAPTER 34
"My
thoughts are not your thoughts," saith the Lord. And, we may add, His
works are not like the works of man. This great truth has never been better
exemplified than in the marvelous rapidity with which the great temperance
reformation grew in Canada, in spite of the most formidable obstacles. To
praise any man for such a work seems to me a kind of blasphemy, when it is so
visibly the work of the Lord. I had hardly finished reading the letter of
Ireland's Apostle of Temperance, when I fell on my knees and said: "Thou
knowest, O my God, that I am nothing but a sinner. There is no light, no
strength in Thy poor unprofitable servant. Therefore, come down into my heart
and soul, to direct me in that temperance reform which Thou hast put into my
mind to establish. Without Thee I can do nothing, but with Thee I can do all
things."
This was on a Saturday night, March 20, 1839. The next morning was the first
Sabbath of Lent. I said to the people after the sermon:
"I have told you, many times, that I sincerely believe it is my mission
from God to put an end to the unspeakable miseries and crimes engendered every
day, here in our whole country, by the use of intoxicating drink. Alcohol is
the great enemy of your souls and your bodies. It is the most implacable enemy
of your wives, your husbands, and your children. It is the most formidable
enemy of our dear country and our holy religion. I must destroy that enemy. But
I cannot fight alone. I must form an army and raise a banner in your midst,
around which all the soldiers of the Gospel will rally. Jesus Christ Himself
will be our general. He will bless and sanctify us He will lead us to victory.
The next three days will be consecrated by you and by me in preparing to raise
that army. Let all those who wish to fill its ranks, come and pass these three
days with me in prayer and meditation before our sacred altars. Let even those
who do not want to be soldiers of Christ, or to fight the great and glorious
battles which are to be fought, come through curiosity, to see a most marvelous
spectacle. I invite every one of you, in the name of our Saviour, Jesus Christ,
whom alcohol nails anew to the cross every day. I invite you in the name of the
holy Virgin Mary, and of all the saints and angels of God, who are weeping in
heaven for the crimes committed every day by the use of intoxicating drinks. I
invite you in the names of the wives whom I see here in your midst, weeping
because they have drunken husbands. I invite you to come in the names of the
fathers whose hearts are broken by drunken children. I invite you to come in the
name of so many children who are starving, naked, and made desolate by their
drunken parents. I invite you to come in the name of your immortal souls, which
are to be eternally damned if the giant destroyer, Alcohol, be not driven from
our midst."
The next morning, at eight o'clock, my church was crammed by the people. My
first address was at half-past eight o'clock, the second at 10:30 a.m., the
third at 2.0 p.m., and the fourth at five. The intervals between the addresses
were filled by beautiful hymns selected for the occasion. Many times during my
discourse the sobs and the cries of the people were such that I had to stop
speaking, to mix my sobs and my tears with those of my people. That first day
seventy-five men, from among the most desperate drunkards, enrolled themselves
under the banner of temperance. The second day I gave again four addresses, the
effects of which were still more blessed in their result. Two hundred of my
dear parishioners were enrolled in the grand army which was to fight against
their implacable enemy. But it would require the hand of an angel to write the
history of the third day, at the end of which, in the midst of tears, sobs, and
cries of joy, three hundred more of that noble people swore, in the presence of
their God, never to touch, taste, or handle the cursed drinks with which Satan
inundates the earth with desolation, and fills hell with eternal cries of
despair. During these three days more than two-thirds of my people had publicly
taken the pledge of temperance, and had solemnly said in the presence of God,
before their altars, "For the love of Jesus Christ, and by the grace of
God, I promise that I will never take any intoxicating drink, except as a
medicine. I also pledge myself to do all in my power, by my words and example,
to persuade others to make the same sacrifice." The majority of my people,
among whom we counted the most degraded drunkards, were changed and reformed,
not by me, surely, but by the visible, direct work of the great and merciful
God, who alone can change the heart of man.
As a great number of people from the surrounding parishes, and even from
Quebec, had come to hear me the third day through curiosity, the news of that
marvelous work spread very quickly throughout the whole country. The press, both
French and English, were unanimous in their praises and felicitations. But when
the Protestants of Quebec were blessing God for that reform, the French
Canadians, at the example of their priests denounced me as a fool and heretic.
The second day of our revival I had sent messages to four of the neighbouring
curates, respectfully requesting them to come and see what the Lord was doing,
and help me to bless Him. But they refused. They answered my note with their
contemptuous silence. One only, the Rev. Mr. Roy, curate of Charlesbourg,
deigned to write me a few words, which I cope here:
Rev. Mr. Chiniquy, Curate of Beauport.
My dear Confrere:Please forgive me if I cannot forget the respect I owe to
myself, enough to go and see your fooleries.
Truly yours,
Pierre Roy.
Charlesbourg, March 5th, 1839.
The
indignation of the bishop knew no bounds. A few days after, he ordered me to go
to his palace and give an account of what he called my "strange
conduct." When alone with me he said: "Is it possible, Mr. Chiniquy,
that you have so soon forgotten my prohibition not to establish that ridiculous
temperance society in your parish? Had you compromised yourself alone by that
Protestant comedy for it is nothing but that I would remain silent, in my pity
for you. But you have compromised our holy religion by introducing a society
whose origin is clearly heretical. Last evening, the venerable Grand Vicar
Demars told me that you would sooner or later become a Protestant, and that
this was your first step. Do you not see that the Protestants only praise you?
Do you not blush to be praised only by heretics? Without suspecting it, you are
just entering a road which leads to your ruin. You have publicly covered
yourself with such ridicule that I fear your usefulness is at an end, not only
in Beauport, but in all my diocese. I do not conceal it from you: my first
thought, when an eye-witness told me yesterday what you had done, was to
interdict you. I have been prevented from taking that step only by the hope
that you will undo what you have done. I hope that you will yourself dissolve
that anti-Catholic association, and promise to put an end to those novelties,
which have too strong a smell of heresy to be tolerated by your bishop."
I answered: "My lord, your lordship has not forgotten that it was
absolutely against my own will that I was appointed curate of Beauport; and God
knows that you have only to say a word, and, without a murmur, I will give you
my resignation, that you may put a better priest at the head of that people,
which I consider, and which is really, today the noblest and the most sober
people of Canada. But I will put a condition to the resignation of my position.
It is, that I will be allowed to publish before the world that the Rev. Mr.
Begin, my predecessor, has never been troubled by his bishop for having allowed
his people, during twenty-three years, to swim in the mire of drunkenness; and
that I have been disgraced by my bishop, and turned out from that same parish,
for having been the instrument, by the mercy of God, in making them the most
sober people in Canada."
The poor bishop felt, at once, that he could not stand on the ground he had
taken with me. He was a few moments without knowing what to say. He saw also
that his threats had no influence over me, and that I was not ready to undo
what I had done. After a painful silence of a minute or two, he said: "Do
you not see that the solemn promises you have extorted from those poor
drunkards are rash and unwise; they will break them at the first opportunity?
Their future state of degradation, after such an excitement, will be worse than
the first."
I answered: "I would partake of your fears if that change were my work;
but as it is the Lord's work, we have nothing to fear. The works of men are
weak, and of short duration, but the works of God are solid and permanent.
About the prophecy of the venerable Mr. Demars, that I have taken my first step
towards Protestantism by turning a drunken into a sober people, I have only to
say that if that prophecy be true, it would show that Protestantism is more apt
than our holy religion to work for the glory of God and the good of the people.
I hope that your lordship is not ready to accept that conclusion, and that you
will not then trouble yourself with the premises. The venerable grand Vicar,
with many other priests, would do better to come and see what the Lord is doing
in Beauport, than to slander me and turn false prophets against its curate and
people. My only answer to the remarks of your lordship, that the Protestants
alone praise me, when the Roman Catholic priests and people condemn me, proves
only one thing, viz., that Protestants, on this question, understand the Word
of God, and have more respect for it than we Roman Catholics. It would prove
also that they understand the interests of humanity better than we do, and that
they have more generosity than we have, to sacrifice their selfish propensities
to the good of all. I take the liberty of saying to your lordship, that in
this, as in many other things, it is high time that we should open our eyes to
our false position.
"Instead of remaining at the lowest step of the ladder of one of the most
Christian virtues, temperance, we must raise ourselves to the top, where
Protestants are reaping so many precious fruits. Besides, would your lordship
be kind enough to tell me why I am denounced and abused here, and by my
fellow-priests and my bishop, for forming a temperance society in my parish,
when Father Mathew, who wrote me lately to encourage and direct me in that
work, is publicly praised by his bishops and blessed by the Pope for covering
Ireland with temperance societies? Is your lordship ready to prove to me that
Samson was a heretic in the camp of Israel when he fulfilled the promise made
by his parents that he would never drink any wine, or beer; and John the
Baptist, was not he a heretic and a Protestant as I am, when, to obey the voice
of God, he did what I do today, with my dear people of Beauport?"
At that very moment, the sub-secretary entered to tell the bishop that a
gentleman wanted to see him immediately on pressing business, and the bishop
abruptly dismissed me, to my great comfort; and my impression was that he was
as glad to get rid of me as I was to get rid of him.
With the exception of the Secretary, Mr. Cazeault, all the priests I met that
day and the next month, either gave me the cold shoulder or overwhelmed me with
their sarcasms. One of them who had friends in Beauport, was bold enough to try
to go through the whole parish to turn me into ridicule by saying that I was
half crazy, and the best thing the people could do was to drink moderately to
my health when they went to town. But at the third house he met a woman, who,
after listening to the bad advice he was giving to her husband, said to him:
"I do not know if our pastor is a fool in making people sober, but I know
you are a messenger of the devil, when you advise my husband to drink again.
You know that he was one of the most desperate drunkards of Beauport. You
personally know also what blows I have received from him when he was drunk; how
poor and miserable we were; how many children had to run on the streets, half
naked, and beg in order not to starve with me! Now that my husband has taken
the pledge of temperance, we have every comfort; my dear children are well fed
and clothed, and I find myself as in a little paradise. If you do not go out of
this house at once, I will turn you out with my broomstick." And she would
have fulfilled her promise, had not the priest had the good sense to disappear
at the "double quick."
The next four months after the foundation of the society in Beauport, my
position when with the other priests was very painful and humiliating. I
consequently avoided their company as much as possible. And, as for my bishop,
I took the resolution never to go and see him, except he should order me into
his presence. But my merciful God indemnified me by the unspeakable joy I had
in seeing the marvelous change wrought by Him among my dear people. Their
fidelity in keeping the pledge was really wonderful, and soon became the object
of admiration of the whole city of Quebec, and of the surrounding country. The
change was sudden, so complete and so permanent, that the scoffing bishop and
priests, with their friends, had, at last, to blush and be silent.
The public aspect of the parish was soon changed, the houses were repaired, the
debts paid, the children well clad. But what spoke most eloquently about the
marvelous reform was that the seven thriving saloons of Beauport were soon
closed, and their owners forced to take other occupations. Peace, happiness,
abundance, and industry, everywhere took the place of the riots, fighting,
blasphemies and the squalid misery which prevailed before. The gratitude and
respect of that noble people for their young curate knew no bounds; as my love
and admiration for them cannot be told by human words.
However, though the great majority of that good people had taken the pledge,
and kept it honourably, there was a small minority, composed of the few who
never had been drunkards, who had not yet enrolled themselves under our blessed
banners. Though they were glad of the reform, it was very difficult to persuade
them to give up their social glass! I thought it was my duty to show them in a
tangible way, what I had so often proved with my words only, that the drinking
of the social glass of wine, or of beer, is an act of folly, if not a crime. I
asked my kind and learned friend, Dr. Douglas, to analyze, before the people,
the very wine and beer used by them, to show that it was nothing else but a
disgusting and deadly poison. He granted my favour. During four days that noble
philanthropist extracted the alcohol, which is not only in the most common, but
in the most costly and renowned wines, beer, brandy and whisky. He gave that
alcohol to several cats and dogs, which died in a few minutes in the presence
of the whole people.
These learned and most interesting experiments, coupled with his eloquent and
scientific remarks, made a most profound impression. It was the corner-stone of
the holy edifice which our merciful God built with His own hands in Beauport.
The few recalcitrants joined with the rest of their dear friends.
.
CHAPTER 35
The
people of Beauport had scarcely been a year enrolled under the banners of
temperance, when the seven thriving taverns of that parish were deserted and
their owners forced to try some more honourable trade for a living. This fact,
published by the whole press of Quebec, more than anything forced the
opponents, especially among the clergy, to silence, without absolutely
reconciling them to my views. However, it was becoming every day more and more
evident to all that the good done in Beauport was incalculable, both in a
material and moral point of view. Several of the best thinking people of the
surrounding parishes began to say to one another: "Why should we not try
to bring into our midst this temperance reformation which is doing so much good
in Beauport?" The wives of drunkards would say: "Why does not our
curate do here what the curate of Beauport has done there?"
On a certain day, one of those unfortunate women who had received, with a good
education, a rich inheritance, which her husband had spent in dissipation, came
to tell me that she had gone to her curate to ask him to establish a temperance
society in his parish, as we had done in Beauport; but he had told her "to
mind her own business." She had then respectfully requested him to invite
me to come and help to do so for his parishioners what I had done for mine, but
she had been sternly rebuked at the mention of my name. The poor woman was
weeping when she said: "Is it possible that our priests are so indifferent
to our sufferings, and that they will let the demon of drunkenness torture us
as long as we live, when God gives us such an easy and honourable way to
destroy his power for ever?"
My heart was touched by the tears of that lady, and I said to her: "I know
a way to put an end to the opposition of your curate, and force him to bring
among you the reformation you so much desire; but it is a very delicate matter
for me to mention to you. I must rely upon your most sacred promise of secrecy,
before opening my mind to you on that subject."
"I take my God to witness," she answered, "that I will never
reveal your secret." "Well, madam, if I can rely upon your discretion
and secrecy, I will tell you an infallible way to force your priest to do what
has been done here."
"Oh! for God's sake," she said, "tell me what to do."
I replied: "The first time you go to confession, say to your priest that
you have a new sin to confess which is very difficult to reveal to him. He will
press you more to confess it. You will then say:
"'Father, I confess I have lost confidence in you.' Being asked 'Why?' You
will tell him: 'Father, you know the bad treatment I have received from my
drunken husband, as well as hundreds of other wives in your parish, from
theirs; you know the tears we have shed on the ruin of our children, who are
destroyed by the bad examples of their drunken fathers; you know the daily
crimes and unspeakable abominations caused by the use of intoxicating drinks;
you could dry our tears and make us happy wives and mothers, you could benefit
our husbands and save our children by establishing the society of temperance
here as it is in Beauport, and you refuse to do it. How, then, can I believe
you are a good priest, and that there is any charity and compassion in you for
us?'
"Listen with a respectful silence to what he will tell you; accept his
penance, and when he asks you if you regret that sin, answer him that you
cannot regret it till he has taken the providential means which God offers him
to persuade the drunkards.
"Get as many other women whom you know are suffering as you do, as you
can, to go and confess to him the same thing; and you will see that his
obstinacy will melt as the snow before the rays of the sun in May."
She was a very intelligent lady. She saw at once that she had in hand an
irresistible power to face her priest out of his shameful and criminal
indifference to the welfare of his people. A fortnight later she came to tell
me that she had done what I had advised her and that more than fifty other
respectable women had confessed to their curate that they had lost confidence
in him, on account of his lack of zeal and charity for his people.
My conjectures were correct. The poor priest was beside himself, when forced
every day to hear from the very lips of his most respectable female
parishioners, that they were losing confidence in him. He feared lest he should
lose his fine parish near Quebec, and be sent to some of the backwoods of
Canada. Three weeks later he was knocking at my door, where he had not been
since the establishment of the temperance society. He was very pale, and looked
anxious. I could see in his countenance that I owed this visit to his fair
penitents. However, I was happy to see him. He was considered a good priest,
and had been one of my best friends before the formation of the temperance
society. I invited him to dine with me, and made him feel at home as much as
possible, for I knew by his embarrassed manner that he had a very difficult
proposition to make. I was not mistaken. He at last said:
"Mr. Chiniquy, we had, at first, great prejudices against your temperance
society; but we see its blessed fruits in the great transformation of Beauport.
Would you be kind enough to preach a retreat of temperance, during three days,
to my people, as you have done here?"
I answered: "Yes, sir; with the greatest pleasure. But it is on condition
that you will yourself be an example of the sacrifice, and the first to take
the solemn pledge of temperance, in the presence of your people."
"Certainly," he answered; "for the pastor must be an example to
his people."
Three weeks later his parish had nobly followed the example of Beauport, and
the good curate had no words to express his joy. Without losing a day, he went
to the two other curates of what is called "La Cote de Beaupre,"
persuaded them to do what he had done, and six weeks after all the saloons from
Beauport to St. Joachim were closed; and it would have been difficult, if not
impossible, to persuade anyone in that whole region to drink a glass of any
intoxicating drink.
Little by little, the country priests were thus giving up their prejudices, and
were bravely rallying around our glorious banners of temperance. But my bishop,
though less severe, was still very cold toward me. At last the good providence
of God forced him, through a great humiliation, to count our society among the greatest
spiritual and temporal blessings of the age.
At the end of August, 1840, the public press informed us that the Count de
Forbin Janson, Bishop of Nancy, in France, was just leaving New York for
Montreal. That bishop, who was the cousin and minister to Charles the Tenth,
had been sent into exile by the French people, after the king had lost his
crown in the Revolution of 1830. Father Mathew had told me, in one of his
letters, that this bishop had visited him, and blessed his work in Ireland, and
had also persuaded the Pope to send him his apostolical benediction.
I saw at once the importance of gaining the approbation of this celebrated man,
before he had been prejudiced by the bishop against our temperance societies. I
asked and obtained leave of absence for a few days, and went to Montreal, which
I reached just an hour after the French bishop. I went immediately to pay my
homage to him, told him about our temperance work, asking him, in the name of
God, to throw bravely the weight of his great name and position in the scale in
favour of our temperance societies. He promised he would, adding: "I am
perfectly persuaded that drunkenness is not only the great and common sin of
the people, but still more of the priests in America, as well as in Ireland. The
social habit of drinking the detestable and poisonous wines, brandies, and
beers used on this continent, and in the northern parts of Europe, where the
vine cannot grow, is so general and strong, that it is almost impossible to
save the people from becoming drunkards, except through an association in which
the elite of society will work together to change the old and pernicious habits
of common life. I have seen Father Mathew, who is doing an incalculable good in
Ireland; and, be sure of it, I shall do all in my power to strengthen your
hands in that great and good work. But do not say to anybody that you have seen
me."
Some days later, the Bishop of Nancy was in Quebec, the guest of the Seminary,
and a grand dinner was given in his honour, to which more than one hundred
priests were invited, with the Archbishop of Quebec, his coadjutor, N. G.
Turgeon, and the Bishop of Montreal, M.Q.R. Bourget.
As one of the youngest curates, I had taken the last seat, which was just
opposite the four bishops, from whom I was separated only by the breadth of the
table. When the rich and rare viands had been well disposed of, and the more
delicate fruits had replaced them, bottles of the choicest wines were brought
on the table in incredible numbers. Then the superior of the college, the Rev.
Mr. Demars, knocked on the table to command silence, and rising on his feet, he
said, at the top of his voice, "Please, my lord bishops, and all of you,
reverend gentlemen, let us drink to the health of my Lord Count de Forbin
Janson, Primate of Lorraine and Bishop of Nancy.
The bottles passing around were briskly emptied into the large glasses put
before everyone of the guests. But when the wine was handed to me I passed it
to my neighbour without taking a drop, and filled my glass with water. My hope
was that nobody had paid any attention to what I had done; but I was mistaken.
The eyes of my bishop, my Lord Signaie, were upon me. With a stern voice, he
said: "Mr. Chiniquy, what are you doing there? Put wine in your glass, to
drink with us the health of Mgr. de Nancy."
These unexpected words fell upon me as a thunderbolt, and really paralyzed me
with terror. I felt the approach of the most terrible tempest I had ever
experienced. My blood ran cold in my veins; I could not utter a word. For what
could I say there, without compromising myself for ever. To openly resist my
bishop, in the presence of such an august assembly, seemed impossible; but to
obey him was also impossible; for I had promised God and my country never to
drink any wine. I thought, at first, that I could disarm my superior by my
modesty and my humble silence. However, I felt that all eyes were upon me. A
real chill of terror and unspeakable anxiety was running through my whole
frame. My heart began to beat so violently that I could not breathe. I wished
then I had followed my first impression, which was not to come to that dinner.
I think I would have suffocated had not a few tears rolled down from my eyes,
and help the circulation of my blood. The Rev. Mr. Lafrance, who was by me,
nudged me, and said, "Do you not hear the order of my Lord Signaie? Why do
you not answer by doing what you are requested to do?" I still remained
mute, just as if nobody had spoken to me. My eyes were cast down; I wished then
I were dead. The silence of death reigning around the tables told me that
everyone was waiting for my answer; but my lips were sealed. After a minute of
that silence, which seemed as long as a whole year, the bishop, with a loud and
angry voice, which filled the large room, repeated: "Why do you not put
wine in your glass, and drink to the health of my Lord Forbin Janson, as the
rest of us are doing?"
I felt I could not be silent any longer. "My lord," I said, with a
subdued and trembling voice, "I have put in my glass what I want to drink.
I have promised God and my country that I would never drink any more
wine."
The bishop, forgetting the respect he owed to himself and to those around him,
answered me in the most insulting manner: "You are nothing but a fanatic,
and you want to reform us."
These words struck me as the shock of a galvanic battery, and transformed me
into a new man. It seemed as if they had added ten feet to my stature and a
thousand pounds to my weight. I forgot that I was the subject of that bishop, and
remembered that I was a man, in the presence of another man. I raised my head
and opened my eyes, and as quick as lightning I rose to my feet, and addressing
the Grand Vicar Demars, superior of the seminary, I said, with calmness,
"Sir, was it that I might be insulted at your table that you have invited
me here? Is it not your duty to defend my honour when I am here, your guest?
But, as you seem to forget what you owe to your guests, I will make my own
defense against my unjust aggressor." Then, turning towards the Bishop de
Nancy, I said: "My Lord de Nancy, I appeal to your lordship from the
unjust sentence of my own bishop. In the name of God, and of His Son, Jesus
Christ, I request you tell us here if a priest cannot, for His Saviour's sake,
and for the good of his fellow-men, as well as for his own selfdenial, give up
for ever the use of wine and other intoxicating drinks, without being abused,
slandered, and insulted, as I am here, in your presence?"
It was evident that my words had made a deep impression on the whole company. A
solemn silence followed for a few seconds, which was interrupted by my bishop,
who said to the Bishop de Nancy, "Yes, yes, my lord; give us your
sentence."
No words can give an idea of the excitement of everyone in that multitude of
priests, who, accustomed from their infancy abjectly to submit to their bishop,
were, for the first time, in the presence of such a hand-to-hand conflict
between a powerless, humble, unprotected, young curate, and his all-powerful,
proud, and haughty archbishop.
The Bishop of Nancy at first refused to grant my request. He felt the
difficulty of his position; but after Bishop Signaie had united his voice to
mine, to press him to give his verdict, he rose and said:
"My Lord Archbishop of Quebec, and you, Mr. Chiniquy, please withdraw your
request. Do not press me to give my views on such a new, but important subject.
It is only a few days since I came in your midst. It will not do that I should
so soon become your judge. The responsibility of a judgment in such a momentous
matter is too great. I cannot accept it."
But when the same pressing request was repeated by nine-tenths of that vast
assembly of priests, and that the archbishop pressed him more and more to
pronounce his sentence, he raised his eyes and hands to heaven, and made a
silent but ardent prayer to God. His countenance took an air of dignity, which
I might call majesty, which gave him more the appearance of an old prophet than
of a man of our day. Then casting his eyes upon his audience, he remained a
considerable time meditating. All eyes were upon him, anxiously waiting for the
sentence. There was an air of grandeur in him at that moment, which seemed to
tell us that the priest blood of the great kings of France was flowing in his
veins. At last, he opened his lips, but it was again pressingly to request me
to settle the difficulty with the archbishop among ourselves, and to discharge
him of that responsibility. But we both refused again to grant him his request,
and pressed him to give his judgment. All this time I was standing, having
publicly said that I would never sit again at that table unless that insult was
wiped away.
Then he said with unspeakable dignity: "My Lord of Quebec! Here, before
us, is our young priest, Mr. Chiniquy, who, once on his knees, in the presence
of God and his angels, for the love of Jesus Christ, the good of his own soul
and the good of his country, has promised never to drink! We are the witnesses
that he is faithful to his promise, though he has been pressed to break it by
your lordship. And because he keeps his pledge with such heroism, your lordship
has called him a fanatic! Now, I am requested by everyone here to pronounce my
verdict on that painful occurrence. Here it is. Mr. Chiniquy drinks no wine! But,
if I look through the past ages, when God Himself was ruling His own people,
through His prophets, I see Samson, who, by the special order of God, never
drank wine or any other intoxicating drink. If from the Old Testament I pass to
the New, I see John the Baptist, the precursor of our Saviour, Jesus Christ,
who, to obey the command of God, never drank any wine! When I look at Mr.
Chiniquy, and see Samson at his right hand to protect him, and John the Baptist
at his left to bless him, I find his position so strong and impregnable, that I
would not dare attack or condemn him!" These words were pronounced in the
most eloquent and dignified manner, and were listened to with a most respectful
and breathless attention.
Bishop de Nancy, keeping his gravity, sat down, emptied his wine glass into a
tumbler, filled it with water and drank to my health.
The poor archbishop was so completely confounded and humiliated that everyone
felt for him. The few minutes spent at the table, after this extraordinary act
of justice, seemed oppressive to everyone. Scarcely anyone dared look at his
neighbour, or speak, except in a low and subdued tone, as when a great calamity
has just occurred. Nobody thought of drinking his wine; and the health of the
Bishop de Nancy was left undrunk. But a good number of priests filled their
glasses with water, and giving me a silent sign of approbation, drank to my
health. The society of temperance had been dragged by her enemies to the
battlefield, to be destroyed; but she bravely fought, and gained the victory.
Now, she was called to begin her triumphant march through Canada.
.
CHAPTER 36
Has
God given us ears to hear, eyes to see, and intelligence to understand? The
Pope says, no! But the Son of God says, yes. One of the most severe rebukes of
our Saviour to His disciples, was for their not paying sufficient attention to
what their eyes had seen, their ears heard, and their intelligence perceived.
"Perceive ye not yet, neither understand? Have ye your heart yet hardened?
Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do not ye
remember?" (Mark viii. 17, 18).
This solemn appeal of our Saviour to our common sense, is the most complete
demolition of the whole fabric of Rome. The day that a man ceases to believe
that God would give us our senses and our intelligence to ruin and deceive us,
but that they were given to guide us, he is lost to the Church of Rome. The
Pope knows it; hence the innumerable encyclicals, laws, and regulations by
which the Roman Catholics are warned not to trust the testimony of their ears,
eyes, or intelligence.
"Shut your eyes," says the Pope to his priests and people; "I
will keep mine opened, and I will see for you. Shut your ears, for it is most
dangerous for you to hear what is said in the world. I will keep my ears
opened, and will tell you what you must know. Remember that to trust your own
intelligence, in the research of truth, and the knowledge of the Word of God,
is sure perdition. If you want to know anything, come to me: I am the only sure
infallible fountain of truth," saith the Pope. And this stupendous
imposture is accepted by the people and the priests of Rome with a mysterious
facility, and retained with a most desolating tenacity.
It is to them what the iron ring is to the nose of the ox, when a rope is once
tied to it. The poor animal loses its self-control. Its natural strength and
energies will avail it nothing; it must go left or right, at the will of the
one who holds the end of the rope. Reader, please have no contempt for the
unfortunate priests and people of Rome, but pity them, when you see them
walking in the ways into which intelligent beings ought not to take a step.
They cannot help it. The ring of the ox is at their nose, and the Pope holds
the end of the rope. Had it not been for that ring, I would not have been long
at the feet of the wafer god of the Pope. Let me tell you one of the shining
rays of truth, which were evidently sent by our merciful God, with a mighty
power, to open my eyes. But I could not follow it; the iron ring was at my
nose; and the Pope was holding the end of the rope.
This was after I had been put at the head of the magnificent parish of
Beauport, in the spring of 1840. There was living at "La Jeune
Lorette" an old retired priest, who was blind. He was born in France,
where he had been condemned to death under the Reign of Terror. Escaped from
the guillotine, he had fled to Canada, where the Bishop of Quebec had put him
in the elevated post of chaplain of the Ursuline Nunnery. He had a fine voice,
was a good musician, and had some pretensions to the title of poet. Having
composed a good number of church hymns, he had been called "Pere
Cantique," but his real name was "Pere Daule." His faith and
piety were of the most exalted character among the Roman Catholics; though
these did not prevent him from being one of the most amiable and jovial men I
ever saw. But his blue eyes, like the eyes of the dove; his fine yellow hair
falling on his shoulders as a golden fleece; his white rosy cheeks, and his
constantly smiling lips, had been too much for the tender hearts of the good
nuns. It was not a secret that "Pere Cantique," when young, had made
several interesting conquests in the nunnery. There was no wonder at that.
Indeed, how could that young and inexperienced butterfly escape damaging his
golden wings, at the numberless burning lamps of the fair virgins? But the
mantle of charity had been put on the wounds which the old warrior had received
on that formidable battlefield, from which even the Davids, Samsons, Solomons,
and many others had escaped only after being mortally wounded.
To help the poor blind priest, the curates around Quebec used to keep him by
turn in their parsonages, and give him the care and marks of respect due to his
old age. After the Rev. Mr. Roy, curate of Charlesbourgh, had kept him five or
six weeks, I had him taken to my parsonage. It was in the month of May a month
entirely consecrated to the worship of the virgin Mary, to whom Father Daule
was a most devoted priest. His zeal was really inexhaustible, when trying to
prove to us how Mary was the surest foundation of the hope and salvation of
sinners; how she was constantly appeasing the just wrath of he son Jesus, who,
were it not for His love and respect to her, would have long since crushed us
down.
The Councils of Rome have forbidden the blind priests to say their mass; but on
account of high piety, he had got from the Pope the privilege of celebrating
the short mass of the Virgin, which he knew perfectly by heart. One morning,
when the old priest was at the altar, saying his mass, and I was in the vestry,
hearing the confessions of the people, the young servant boy came to me in
haste, and said, "Father Daule calls you; please come quick."
Fearing something wrong had happened to my old friend, I lost no time, and ran
to him. I found him nervously tapping the altar with his two hands, as in
anxious search of some very precious thing. When very near to him, said:
"What do you want?" He answered with a shriek of distress: "The
good god had disappeared from the altar. He is lost! J'ai perdu le Bon Dieu. Il
est disparu de dessus l'autel!" Hoping that he was mistaken, and that he
had only thrown away the good god, "Le Bon Dieu," on the floor, by
some accident, I looked on the altar, at his feet, everywhere I could suspect
that the good god might have been moved away by some mistake of the hand. But
the most minute search was of no avail; the good god could not be found. I
really felt stunned. At first, remembering the thousand miracles I had read of
the disappearance, and marvelous changes of form of the wafer god, it came to
my mind that we were in the presence of some great miracle; and that my eyes
were to see some of these great marvels of which the books of the Church of
Rome are filled. But I had soon to change my mind, when a thought flashed
through my memory which chilled the blood in my veins. The church of Beauport
was inhabited by a multitude of the boldest and most insolent rats I have ever
seen. Many times, when saying my mass, I had seen the ugly noses of several of
them, who, undoubtedly attracted by the smell of the fresh wafer, wanted to
make their breakfast with the body, blood, and soul, and divinity of my Christ.
But, as I was constantly in motion, or praying with a loud voice, the rats had
invariably been frightened and fled away into their secret quarters. I felt
terror-stricken by the thought that the good god (Le Bon Dieu) had been taken
away and eaten by the rats.
Father Daule so sincerely believed what all the priests of Rome are bound to
believe, that he had the power to turn the wafer into God, that, after he had
pronounced the words by which the great marvel was wrought, he used to pass
from five to fifteen minutes in silent adoration. He was then as motionless as
a marble statue, and his feelings were so strong that often torrents of tears
used to flow from his eyes on his cheeks. Leaning my head towards the
distressed old priest, I asked him: "Have you not remained, as you are
used, a long time motionless, in adoring the good god, after the
consecration?"
He quickly answered, "Yes; but what has this to do with the loss of the
good god?"
I replied in a low voice, but with a real accent of distress and awe,
"Some rats have dragged and eaten the good god!"
"What do you say?" replied Father Daule. "The good god carried
away and eaten by rats!"
"Yes," I replied, "I have not the least doubt about it."
"My God! my God! what a dreadful calamity upon me!" rejoined the old
man; and raising his hands and his eyes to heaven, he cried out again, "My
God! my God! Why have you not taken away my life before such a misfortune could
fall upon me!" He could not speak any longer; his voice was chocked by his
sobs.
At first I did not know what to say; a thousand thoughts, some very grave, some
exceedingly ludicrous, crossed my mind more rapidly than I can say them. I
stood there as nailed to the floor, by the old priest, who was weeping as a
child, till he asked me, with a voice broken by his sobs, "What must I do
now?" I answered him: "The Church has foreseen occurrences of that
kind, and provided for them the remedy. The only thing you have to do is to get
a new wafer, consecrate it, and continue your mass as if nothing strange had
occurred. I will go and get you, just now, new bread." I went, without
losing a moment, to the vestry, got and brought a new wafer, which he
consecrated and turned into a new god, and finished his mass, as I had told
him. After it was over, I took the disconsolate old priest by the hand to my
parsonage for breakfast. But all along the way he rent the air with his cries
of distress. He would hardly taste anything, for his soul was really drowned in
a sea of distress. I vainly tried to calm his feelings, by telling him that it
was no fault of his; that this strange and sad occurrence was not the first of
that kind; and that it had been calmly foreseen by the Church, which had told
us what to do in these circumstances; that there was no neglect, no fault, no
offense against God or man on his part.
But as he would not pay the least attention to what I said, I felt the only
thing I had to do was to remain silent, and respect his grief by telling him to
unburden his heart by his lamentations and tears.
I had hoped that this good common sense would help him to overcome his
feelings, but I was mistaken; his lamentations were as long as those of
Jeremiah, and the expressions of his grief as bitter.
At last I lost patience, and said: "My dear Father Daule, allow me to tell
you respectfully that it is quite time to stop these lamentations and tears.
Our great and just God cannot like such an excess of sorrow and regret about a
thing which was only, and entirely, under the control of His power and eternal
wisdom."
"What do you say there?" replied the old priest, with a vivacity
which resembled anger.
"I say that, as it was not in your power to foresee or to avoid that
occurrence, you have not the least reason to act and speak as you do. Let us
keep our regrets and our tears for our sins: we both have committed many; we
cannot shed too many tears on them. But there is no sin here, and there must be
some reasonable limits to our sorrow. If anybody had to weep and regret without
measure what has happened, it would be Christ. For He alone could foresee that
event, and He alone could prevent it. Had it been His will to oppose this sad
and mysterious fact, it was in His, not in our power to prevent it. He alone
has suffered from it, because it was His will to suffer it."
"Mr. Chiniquy," he replied, "you are quite a young man, and I see
you have the want of attention and experience which are often seen among young
priests. You do not pay sufficient attention to the awful calamity which has
just occurred in your church. If you had more faith and piety you would weep
with me, instead of laughing at my grief. How can you speak so lightly of a
thing which makes the angels of God weep? Our dear Saviour dragged and eaten by
rats! Oh! great God! does not this surpass the humiliation and horrors of
Calvary?"
"My dear Father Daule," I replied, "allow me respectfully to
tell you, that I understand, as well as you do, the nature of the deplorable
event of this morning. I would have give my blood to prevent it. But let us
look at that fact in its proper light. It is not a moral action for us; it did
not depend on our will more than the spots of the sun. The only one who is
accountable for that fact is our God! For, again I say, that He was the only
one who could foresee and prevent it. And, to give you plainly my own mind, I
tell you here that if I were God Almighty, and a miserable rat would come to
eat me, I would strike him dead before he could touch me."
There is no need of confessing it here; every one who reads these pages, and
pays attention to this conversation, will understand that my former so robust
faith in my priestly power of changing the wafer into my God had melted away
and evaporated from my mind, if not entirely, at least to a great extent.
Great and new lights had flashed through my soul in that hour; evidently my God
wanted to open my eyes to the awful absurdities and impieties of a religion
whose god could be dragged and eaten by rats. Had I been faithful to the saving
lights which were in me then, I was saved in that very hour; and before the end
of that day I would have broken the shameful chains by which the Pope had tied
my neck to his idol of bread. In that hour it seemed to me evident that the
dogma of transubstantiation was a most monstrous imposture, and my priesthood
an insult to God and man.
My intelligence said to me with a thundering voice: "Do not remain any
longer the priest of a god whom you make every day, and whom the rats can
eat."
Though blind, Father Daule understood very well, by the stern accents of my
voice, that my faith in the god whom he had created that morning, and whom the
rats had eaten, had been seriously modified, if not entirely crumbled down. He
remained silent for some time, after which he invited me to sit by him; and he
spoke to me with a pathos and an authority which my youth and his old age alone
could justify. He gave me the most awful rebuke I ever had; he really opened on
my poor wavering intelligence, soul and heart, all the cataracts of heaven. He
overwhelmed me with a deluge of Holy Fathers, Councils, and infallible Popes
who had believed and preached before the whole world, in all ages, the dogma of
transubstantiation.
If I had paid attention the voice of my intelligence, and accepted the lights
which my merciful God was giving me, I could easily have smashed the arguments
of the old priest of Rome. But what has the intelligence to do in the Church of
Rome? What could my intelligence say? I was forbidden to hear it. What was the
weight of my poor, isolated intelligence, when put in the balance against so
many learned, holy, infallible intelligences?
Alas! I was not aware then that the weight of the intelligence of God, the
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, was on my side; and that, weighted against the
intelligence of the Popes, they were greater than all the worlds against a
grain of sand.
One hour after, shedding tears of regret, I was at the feet of Father Daule, in
the confessional box, confessing the great sin I had committed by doubting, for
a moment, of the power of the priest to change a wafer into God.
The old priest, whose voice had been like a lion's voice when speaking to the
unbelieving curate of Beauport, had become sweet as the voice of a lamb when he
had me at his feet, confessing my unbelief. He gave me my pardon. For my
penance he forbade me ever to say a word on the sad end of the god he had
created that morning; for, said he, "This would destroy the faith of the
most sincere Roman Catholics." For the other part of the penance I had to
go on my knees every day, during nine days, before the fourteen images of the way
of the cross, and say a penitential psalm before every picture, which I did.
But the sixth day the skin of my knees was pierced, and the blood was flowing
freely. I suffered real torture every time I knelt down, and at every step I
made. But it seemed to me that these terrible tortures were nothing compared to
my great iniquity!
I had refused, for a moment, to believe that a man can create his god with a
wafer! and I had thought that a church which adores a god eaten by rats, must
be an idolatrous church!
.
CHAPTER 37
A
few days before the arrival of Bishop de Forbin Janson, I was alone in my
study, considering my false position towards my ecclesiastical superiors, on
account of my establishing the temperance society against their formal protest.
My heart was sad. My partial success had not blinded me to the reality of my
deplorable isolation from the great mass of the clergy. With a very few
exceptions, they were speaking of me as a dangerous man. They had even given me
the nick-name of "Le reformateur au petit pied" (small-sized
reformer) and were losing no opportunity of showing me their supreme contempt
and indignation, for what they called my obstinacy.
In that sad hour, there were many clouds around my horizon, and my mind was
filled with anxiety; when, suddenly, a stranger knocked at my door. He was a
good-sized man; his smiling lips and honest face were beaming with the utmost
kindness. His large and noble forehead told me, at once, that my visitor was a
man of superior intellect. His whole mien was that of a true gentleman.
He pressed my hand with the cordiality of an old friend and, giving me his
name, he told me at once the object of his visit, in these words:
"I do not come here only in my name: but it is in the name of many, if not
of all, the English-speaking people of Quebec and Canada; I want to tell you
our admiration for the great reform you have accomplished in Beauport. We know
the stern opposition of your superiors and fellowpriests to your efforts, and
we admire you more for that.
"Go on, sir, you have on your side the great God of heaven, who has said
to us all: 'Look not thou upon the wine when it is red, when it giveth its
colour in the cup, when it moveth itself aright. At the last, it biteth like a
serpent, and stingeth like an adder.'" (Prov. xxiii. 31, 32). "Take
courage, sir," he added; "you have, on your side, the Saviour of the
world, Jesus Christ Himself. Fear not man, sir, when God the Father, and His
Son, Jesus Christ, are on your side. If you find any opposition from some
quarter; and if deluded men turn you into ridicule when you are doing such a
Christian work, bless the Lord. For Jesus Christ has said: 'Blessed are they
who do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled. Blessed
are ye when men shall revile you and persecute you, and shall say all manner of
evil against you, falsely, for My sake.' (Matt. v. 6, 11.) I come also to tell
you sir, that if there are men to oppose you, there are many more who are
praying for you day and night, asking our heavenly Father to pour upon you His
most abundant blessings. Intoxicating drinks are the curse of this young
country. It is the most deadly foe of every father and mother, the most
implacable enemy of every child in Canada. It is the ruin of our rich families,
as well as the destruction of the poor. The use of intoxicating drinks, under
any form, or pretext, is an act of supreme folly; for alcohol kills the body
and damns the soul of its blind victims. You have, for the first time, raised
the glorious banners of temperance among the French Canadian people; though you
are alone, today, to lift it up, be not discouraged. For, before long, you will
see your intelligent countrymen rallying around it, to help you to fight and to
conquer. No doubt, the seed you sow today is often watered with your tears.
But, before long, you will reap the richest crop; and your heart will be filled
with joy, when your grateful country will bless your name."
After a few other sentences of the same elevated sentiments, he hardly gave me
time enough to express my feelings of gratitude, and said: "I know you are
very busy, I do not want to trespass upon your time. Goodbye, sir. May the Lord
bless you, and be your keeper in all your ways."
He pressed my hand, and soon disappeared. I would try, in vain, to express what
I felt when alone with my God, after that strange and providential visit. My
first thought was to fall on my knees and thank that merciful God for having
sent such a messenger to cheer me in one of the darkest hours of my life; for every
word from his lips had fallen on my wounded soul as the oil of the Good
Samaritan on the bleeding wounds of the traveler to Jericho. There had been
such an elevation of thought, such a ring of true, simple, but sublime faith
and piety; such love of man and fear of God in all that he had said. It was the
first time that I had heard words so conformable to my personal views and
profound convictions on that subject. That stranger, whose visit had passed as
quickly as the visit of an angel from God, had filled my heart with such joy
and surprise at the unexpected news that all the Englishspeaking people of
Canada were praying for me!
However, I did not fall on my knees to thank God; for my sentiments of
gratitude to God were suddenly chilled by the unspeakable humiliation I felt
when I considered that that stranger was a Protestant! The comparison I was
forced to make between the noble sentiments, the high philosophy, the Christian
principles of that Protestant layman, with the low expressions of contempt, the
absolute want of generous and Christian thoughts of my bishop and my
fellow-priests when they were turning into ridicule that temperance society
which God was so visibly presenting to us the best, if not the only way, to
save the thousands of drunkards who were perishing around us, paralyzed my
lips, bewildered my mind, and made it impossible for me to utter a word of
prayer. My first sentiments of joy and of gratitude to God soon gave way to
sentiments of unspeakable shame and distress.
I was forced to acknowledge that these Protestants, whom my Church had taught
me, through all her councils, to anathematize and curse as the slaves and
followers of Satan, were, in their principles of morality, higher above us than
the heavens are above the earth! I had to confess to myself that those
heretics, whom my church had taught me to consider as rebels against Christ and
His Church, knew the laws of God and followed them much more closely than
ourselves. They had raised themselves to the highest degree of Christian
temperance, when my bishops, with their priests, were swimming in the deadly
waters of drunkenness!
A voice seemed crying to me, "Where is the superiority of holiness of your
proud Church of Rome over those so called heretics, who follow more closely the
counsels and precepts of the gospel of Christ?" I tried to stifle that
voice, but I could not. Louder and Louder it was heard asking me, "Who is
nearer God? The bishop who so obstinately opposes a reform which is so
evidently according to the Divine Word, or those earnest followers of the
gospel who make the sacrifice of their old and most cherished usages with such
pleasure, when they see it is for the good of their fellow-men and the glory of
God?" I wished them to be a hundred feet below the ground, in order not to
hear those questions answered within my soul. But there was no help; I had to
hear them, and to blush at the reality before my eyes. Pride! yes, diabolical
pride! is the vice, par excellence, of every priest of Rome. Just as he is
taught to believe and say that his church is far above every other church, so
he is taught to believe and say that, as a priest, he is above all the kings,
emperors, governors, and presidents of this world. That pride is the daily
bread of the Pope, the bishop, the priests, and even the lowest layman in the
Church of Rome. It is also the great secret of their power and strength. It is
this diabolical pride which nerves them with an iron will, to bring down
everything to their feet, subject every human being to their will, and tie
every neck to the wheels of their chariot. It is this fearful pride which so
often gives them that stoical patience and indomitable courage in the midst of
the most cruel pain, of in the face of the most appalling death, which so many
deluded Protestants take for Christian courage and heroism. The priest of Rome
believes that he is called by God Almighty to rule, subdue, and govern the
world; with all those prerogatives that he fancies granted him by heaven he
builds up a high pyramid, on the top of which he sets himself, and from that
elevation looks down with the utmost contempt on the rest of the world.
If anyone suspects that I exaggerate in thus speaking of the pride of the
priests, let him read the following haughty words which Cardinal Manning puts
in the lips of the Pope in one of his lectures:
"I acknowledge no civil power; I am the subject of no prince. I am more
than this. I claim to be the supreme judge and director of the conscience of
men: of the peasant who tills his field, and of the prince who sits upon the
throne; of the household that lives in he shade of privacy, and the legislator
that makes laws for the kingdom. I am the sole, last, supreme judge of what is
right or wrong."
Is it not evident that the Holy Ghost speaks of this pride of the priests and
of the Pope, the high priest of Rome, when He says: "That man of
sin," that "son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above
all that is called God, or what is worshipped; so that he, as God, sitteth in
the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God" (2 Thess. ii. 3, 4).
That caste pride which was in me, though I did not see it then, as it is in
every priest of Rome, though he does not suspect it, had received a rude check,
indeed, from that Protestant visitor. Yes, I must confess it, he had inflicted
a deadly wound on my priestly pride; he had thrown a barbed arrow into my
priestly soul which I tried many times, but always in vain, to take away. The
more I attempted to get rid of this arrow, the deeper it went through my very
bones and marrow. That strange visitor, who caused me to pass so many hours and
days of humiliation, when forcing me to blush at the inferiority of the
Christian principles of my church compared with those of the Protestants, is
well known in Canada, the United States, and Great Britain as the founder and
first editor of two of the best religious papers of America, the Montreal
Witness and the New York Witness. His name is John Dougall. As he is still
living, I am happy to have this opportunity of thanking and blessing him again
for the visit he paid to the young curate of Beauport forty-five years ago. I
was not aware then that the wounds inflicted by that unknown but friendly hand
was one of the great favours bestowed upon me by my merciful God; but I
understand it now. Many rays of light have since come from the wounds which my
priestly pride received that day. Those rays of light helped much to expel the
darkness which surrounded me by leading me to see, in spite of myself, that the
vaunted holiness of the Church of Rome is a fraud.
.
CHAPTER 38
The
battle fought and gained at the grand dinner of the Quebec Seminary by the
society of temperance had been decisive. The triumph was as complete as it was
glorious. Hereafter her march to the conquest of Canada was to be a triumph.
Her banners were soon to be planted over all the cities, towns, and villages of
my dear country. To commemorate the expression of their joy and gratitude to
God to the remotest generations, the people of Beauport erected the beautiful
Column of Temperance, which is still seen half-way between Quebec and the
Montmorency Falls. The Bishop de Nancy, my Lord Forbin Janson, blessed that
first monument of Temperance, September 7th, 1841, in the midst of an immense
multitude of people. The parishes of St. Peter, St. John, St. Famille (Orleans
Island), with St. Michael were the first, after Lange Gardien, Chateau Richer,
St. Anne and St. Joachin, to request me to preach on Temperance. Soon after,
the whole population of St. Roch, Quebec, took the pledge with a wonderful
unanimity, and kept it long with marvelous fidelity. In order to show to the
whole country their feelings of gratitude, they presented me with a fine
picture of the Column of Temperance and a complimentary address, written and
delivered by one of the most promising young men of Quebec, Mr. John Cauchon,
who was raised some years later to the dignity of a Cabinet Minister, and who
has been the worthy Lieutenant-Governor of Manitoba.
That address was soon followed by another from the citizens of Quebec and
Beauport, presented along with my portrait, by Mr. Joseph Parent, then editor
of the Canadien, and afterwards Provincial Secretary of Canada.
What a strange being man is! How fickle are his judgments! In 1842, they had no
words sufficiently flattering to praise the very man in the face of whom they
were spitting in 1838, for doing the very same thing. Was I better for
establishing the society of temperance in 1842, than I was in establishing it
in 1838? No! And was I worse when, in 1838, bishops, priests, and people, were
abusing, slandering, and giving me bad names for raising the banners of
temperance over my country, than I was in continuing to lift it up in 1842? No!
The sudden and complete judgments of men in such a short period of time had the
good and providential effect of filling my mind with the most supreme
indifference, not to say contempt, for what men thought or said of me. Yes!
this sudden passage from condemnation to that of praise, when I was doing the
very same work, had the good effect to cure me of that natural pride which one
is apt to feel when publicly applauded by men.
It is to that knowledge, acquired when young, that I owe the preservation of my
dignity as a man and priest, when all my bishops and their priests were arrayed
against me at the dining table of the Seminary of Quebec. It is that knowledge,
also, that taught me not to forget that I was nothing but a worm of the dust
and an unprofitable servant of God, when the same men overwhelmed me with their
unmerited praises. Let not my readers think, however, that I was absolutely
indifferent to this charge of public feeling. For no words can tell the joy I
felt at the assurance which these public manifestations afforded me that the
cause of temperance was to triumph everywhere in my country. Let me tell here a
fact too honourable to the people of Beauport to be omitted. As soon as the
demon of intemperance was driven from my parish, I felt that my first duty was
to give my attention to education, which had been so shamefully neglected by my
predecessors that there was not a single school in the parish worthy of that
name. I proposed my plan to the people, asked their co-operation, and set to
work without delay. I began by erecting the fine stone school-house near the
church, on the site of the old parsonage; the old walls were pulled down, and
on the old foundation a good structure was soon erected with the free
collections raised in the village. But the work was hardly half-finished when I
found myself without a cent to carry on. I saw at once that, having no idea of
the value of education, the people would murmur at my asking any more money. I
therefore sold my horse a fine animal given me by a rich uncle and with the
money finished the building.
My people felt humiliated and pained at seeing their pastor obliged to walk
when going to Quebec or visiting the sick. They said to each other: "Is it
not a burning shame for us to have forced our young curate to sell his fine
horse to build our school-houses, when it would have been so easy to do that
work ourselves? Let us repair our faults."
On my return from establishing the society of temperance in St. John, two weeks
later, my servant man said to me:
"Please, Mr. le Cure, come to the stable and see a very curious
thing."
"What curious thing can there be?" I answered.
"Well, sir, please come, and you will see."
What was both my surprise and pleasure to find one of the most splendid
Canadian horses there as mine! For my servant said to me, "During you
absence the people have raised five hundred dollars, and bought this fine horse
for you. They say they do not want any longer to see their curate walking in
the mud. When they drove the horse here, that I might present him to you as a
surprise on your arrival, I heard them saying that with the temperance society
you have saved them more than five hundred dollars every week in money, time,
and health, and that it was only an act of justice to give you the savings of a
week."
The only way of expressing my gratitude to my noble people, was to redouble my
exertions in securing the benefits of a good education to their children. I
soon proposed to the people to build another schoolhouse two miles distant from
the first.
But I was not long without seeing that this new enterprise was to be still more
uphill work than the first one among the people, of whom hardly one in fifty
could sign his name.
"Have not our fathers done well without those costly schools?" said
many. "What is the use of spending so much money for a thing that does not
add a day to our existence, nor an atom to our comfort?"
I soon felt confronted by such a deadly indifference, not to say opposition, on
the part of my best farmers, that I feared for a few days lest I had really
gone too far. The last cent of my own revenues was not only given, but a little
personal debt created to meet the payments, and a round sum of five hundred
dollars had to be found to finish the work. I visited the richest man of
Beauport to ask him to come to my rescue. Forty years before he had come to
Beauport bare-footed, without a cent to work. He had employed his first earned
dollars in purchasing some rum, with which he had doubled his money in two
hours; and had continued to double his money, at that rate, in the same way,
till he was worth nearly two hundred thousand dollars.
He then stopped selling rum, to invest his money in city properties. He
answered me: "My dear curate, I would have no objections to give you the
five hundred dollars you want, if I had not met the Grand Vicar Demars
yesterday, who warned me, as an old friend, against what he calls your
dangerous and exaggerated views in reference to the education of the people. He
advised me, for your own good, and the good of the people, to do all in my power
to induce you to desist from your plan of covering our parishes with
schools."
"Will you allow me," I answered, "to mention our conversation to
Mr. Demars, and tell him what you have just said about his advising you to
oppose me in my efforts to promote the interests of education?"
"Yes,sir, by all means," answered Mr. Des Roussell. "I allow you
to repeat to the venerable superior of the Seminary of Quebec, what he said to
me yesterday; ;it was not a secret, for there were several other farmers of
Beauport to whom he said the very same thing. If you ignore that the priests of
Quebec are opposed to your plans of educating our children, you must be the
only one who does not know it, for it is a public fact. Your difficulties in
raising the funds you want, come only from the opposition of the rest of the
clergy to you in this matter; we have plenty of money in Beauport to day, and
we would feel happy to help you. But you understand that our good will be
somewhat cooled by the opposition of men whom we are accustomed to
respect."
I replied: "Do you not remember, my dear Mr. Des Roussell, that those very
same priests opposed me in the same way, in my very first efforts to establish
the temperance society in your midst?"
"Yes, sir," he answered, with a smile, "we remember it well, but
you have converted them to your views now."
"Well, my dear sir, I hope we shall convert them also in this question of
education."
The very next morning, I was knocking at the door of the Rev. Grand Vicar
Demars, after I had tied my splendid horse in the courtyard of the Seminary of
Quebec. I was received with the utmost marks of courtesy. Without losing any
time, I repeated to the old Superior what Mr. Des Roussell had told me of his
opposition to my educational plans, and respectfully asked him if it were true.
The poor Grand Vicar seemed as if thunderstruck by my abrupt, though polite
question. He tried, at first, to explain what he had said, by taking a long
circuit, but I mercilessly brought him to the point at issue, and forced him to
say, "Yes, I said it."
I then rejoined and said, "Mr. Grand Vicar, I am only a child before you,
when comparing my age with yours; however, I have the honour to be the curate
of Beauport, it is in that capacity that I respectfully ask you by what right
you oppose my plans for educating our children!"
"I hope, Mr. Chiniquy," he answered, "that you do not mean to
say that I am he enemy of education; for I would answer you that this is the
first house of education on this continent, and that I was at its head before
you were born. I hope that I have the right to believe and say that the old
Superior of the Seminary of Quebec understands, as well as the young curate of
Beauport, the advantage of a good education. But I will repeat to you what I said
to Mr. Des Roussell, that it is a great mistake to introduce such a general
system of education as you want to do in Beauport. Let every parish have its
well-educated notary, doctor, merchants, and a few others to do the public
business; that is enough. Our parishes of Canada are models of peace and
harmony under the direction of their good curates, but they will become
unmanageable the very day your system of education spreads abroad; for then all
the bad propensities of the heart will be developed with an irresistible force.
Besides, you know that since the conquest of Canada by Protestant England, the
Protestants are waiting for their opportunity to spread the Bible among our
people. The only barrier we can oppose to that danger is to have, in future, as
in the past, only a very limited number of our people who can read or write.
For as soon as the common people are able to read, they will, like Adam and
Eve, taste the forbidden fruit; they will read the Bible, turn Protestant, and
be lost for time and eternity."
In my answer, among other things, I said: "Go into the country, look at
the farm which is well-cultivated, ploughed with attention and skill, richly
manured, and sown with good seed; is it not infinitely more pleasant and
beautiful to live on such a farm, than on one which is neglected, unskillfully
managed and covered with noxious weeds? Well, the difference between a well
educated and an uneducated people is still greater in my mind. "I know
that the priests of Canada, in general, have your views, and it is for that
reason that the parish of Beauport with its immense revenues had been left
without a school worthy the name, from its foundation to my going there. But my
views are absolutely different. And as for your fear of the Bible, I confess we
are antipodes to each other. I consider that one of the greatest blessings God
has bestowed upon me, is that I have read the Bible, when I was on my mother's
knees. I do not even conceal from you, that one of my objects in giving a good
education to every boy and girl of Beauport, is to put the Gospel of Christ in
their hands, as soon as they are able to read it."
At the end of our conversation, which was very excited on both sides, though
kept in the bounds of politeness during nearly two hours, I said:
"Mr. Grand Vicar, I did not come here to convert you to my views, this
would have been impertinence on my part; nor can you convert me to yours, if
you are trying it, for you know I have the bad reputation of being a hard case;
I came to ask you, as a favour, to let me work according to my conscience in a
parish which is mine and not yours. Do not interfere any more in my affairs
between me and my parishioners, than you would like me to interfere in the
management of your Seminary. As you would not like me to criticize you before
your pupils and turn you into ridicule, please cease adding to my difficulties
among my people, by continuing in the future what you have done in the past.
"You know, Mr. Grand Vicar, that I have always respected you as my father;
you have many times been my adviser, my confessor, and my friend; I hope you
will grant me the favour I ask from you in the name of our common Saviour. It
is for the spiritual and temporal good of the people and pastor of Beauport
that I make this prayer."
That old priest was a kind-hearted man; these last words melted his heart. He
promised what I wanted, and we parted from each other on better terms than I
had expected at first.
When crossing the courtyard of the Seminary, I saw the Archbishop Signaie, who,
coming from taking a ride, had stopped to look at my horse and admire it. When
near him, I said: "My lord, this is a bishop's horse, and ought to be in
your hands."
"It is what I was saying to my secretary," replied the bishop.
"How long is it since you got it?"
"Only a few days ago, my lord."
"Have you any intention of selling it?"
"I would, if it would please my bishop," I replied.
"What is the price?" asked the bishop.
"Those who gave it to me paid five hundred dollars for it," I
replied.
"Oh! oh! that is too dear," rejoined the bishop, "with five
hundred dollars, we can get five good horses. Two hundred would be
enough."
"Your lordship is joking. Were I as rich as I am poor, one thousand
dollars would not take that noble animal from my hands, except to have it put
in the carosse of my bishop."
"Go and write a cheque of two hundred dollars to the order of Mr.
Chiniquy," said the bishop to his sub-secretary, Mr. Belisle.
When the secretary had gone to write the cheque, the bishop being alone with
me, took from his portfeuille three bank bills of one hundred dollars each, and
put them into my hands, saying: "This will make up your five hundred
dollars, when my secretary gives you the cheque. But, please, say nothing to
anybody, not even to my secretary. I do not like to have my private affairs
talked of around the corners of the streets. That horse is the most splendid I
ever saw, and I am much obliged to you for having sold it to me."
I was also very glad to have five hundred dollars in hand. For with three
hundred dollars I could finish my schoolhouse, and there was two hundred more
to begin another, three miles distant. Just two weeks later, when I was
dressing myself at sunrise, my servant man came to my room and said:
"There are twenty men on horseback who want to speak to you."
"Twenty men on horseback who want to speak to me!" I answered.
"Are you dreaming?"
"I do not dream," answered my young man; "there they are at the
door, on horseback, waiting for you."
I was soon dressed, and in the presence of twenty of my best farmers, on
horseback, who had formed themselves in a half-circle to receive me.
"What do you want, my friends?" I asked them.
One of them, who had studied a few years in the Seminary of Quebec, answered:
"Dear pastor, we come in the name of the whole people of Beauport, to ask
your pardon for having saddened your heart by not coming as we ought to your
help in the superhuman efforts you make to give good schools to our children.
This is the result of our ignorance. Having never gone to school ourselves, the
greater part of us have never known the value of education. But the heroic
sacrifices you have made lately have opened our eyes. They ought to have been
opened at the sale of your first horse. But we were in need of another lesson
to understand our meanness. However, the selling of the second horse has done
more than anything else to awaken us from our shameful lethargy. The fear of
receiving a new rebuke from us, if you made another appeal to our generosity,
has forced you to make that new sacrifice. The first news came to us as a
thunderbolt. But there is always some light in a thunderbolt; through that
light we have seen our profound degradation, in shutting our ears to your
earnest and paternal appeals in favour of our own dear children. Be sure, dear
pastor, that we are ashamed of our conduct. From this day, not only our hearts,
but our purses are yours, in all you want to do to secure a good education for
our families. However, our principal object in coming here today is not to say
vain words, but to do an act of reparation and justice. Our first thought, when
we heard that you had sold the horse we had given you, was to present you with
another. We have been prevented from doing this by the certainty that you would
sell it again, either to help some poor people or to build another schoolhouse.
As we cannot bear to see our pastor walking in the mud when going to the city,
or visiting us, we have determined to put another horse into your hands, but in
such a way that you will not have the right to sell it. We ask you, then, as a
favour, to select the best horse here among these twenty which are before you,
and to keep it as long as you remain in our midst, which we hope will be very
long. It will be returned to its present possessor if you leave us; and be
sure, dear pastor, that the one of us who leaves his horse in your hands will
be the most happy and proudest of all."
When speaking thus, that noble hearted man had several times been unable to
conceal the tears which were rolling down his cheeks, and more than once his
trembling voice had been choked by his emotion.
I tried in vain at first to speak. My feelings of gratitude and admiration
could be expressed only with my tears. It took some time before I could utter a
single word. At last I said: "My dear friends, this to too much for your
poor pastor. I feel overwhelmed by this grand act of kindness. I do not say
that I thank you the word thank is too small too short and insignificant to
tell you what your poor unworthy pastor feels at what his eyes see and his ears
hear just now. The great and merciful God, who has put those sentiments into
your hearts, alone can repay you for the joy with which you fill my soul. I
would hurt your feelings, I know, by not accepting your offering: I accept it.
But to punish your speaker, Mr. Parent, for his complimentary address, I will
take his horse, for the time I am curate of Beauport, which, I hope, will be
till I die." And I laid my hand on the bridle of the splendid animal. There
was then a struggle which I had not expected. Every one of the nineteen whom I
left with their horses began to cry: "Oh!, do not take that horse; it is
not worth a penny; mine is much stronger," said one. "Mine is much
faster," cried our another. "Mine is a safe rider," said a
third. Every one wanted me to take his horse, and tried to persuade me that it
was the best of all; they really felt sorry that they were not able to change
my mind. Has anyone ever felt more happy than I was in the midst of these
generous friends? The memory of that happy hour will never pass away from my
mind.
.
CHAPTER 39
On
the morning of the 25th August, 1842, we blessed and opened the seventh school
of Beauport. From that day all the children were to receive as good an education
as could be given in any country place of Canada. Those schools had been raised
on the ruins of the seven taverns which had so long spread ruin, shame,
desolation, and death over that splendid parish. My heart was filled with an
unspeakable joy at the sight of the marvelous things which, by the hand of God,
had been wrought in such a short time.
At about two p.m. of that never-to-be-forgotten day, after I had said my
vespers, and was alone, pacing the alleys of my garden, under the shade of the
old maple trees bordering the northern part of that beautiful spot, I was
reviewing the struggles and the victories of these last four years: it seemed
that everything around me, not only the giant trees which were protecting me
from the burning sun, but even the humblest grasses and flowers of my garden,
had a voice to tell me, "Bless the Lord for His mercies."
At my feet the majestic St. Lawrence was rolling its deep waters; beyond, the
old capital of Canada, Quebec, with its massive citadel, its proud towers, its
bristling cannons, its numerous houses and steeples, with their tin roofs
reflecting the light of the sun in myriads of rays, formed such a spectacle of
fairy beauty as no pen can describe. The fresh breeze from the river, mingled
with the perfume of the thousand flowers of my parterre, bathed me in an
atmosphere of fragrance. Never yet had I enjoyed life as at that hour. All the
sanguine desires of my heart and the holy aspirations of my soul had been more
than realized. Peace, harmony, industry, abundance, happiness, religion, and
education had come on the heels of temperance, to gladden and cheer the
families which God had entrusted to me. The former hard feelings of my
ecclesiastical superiors had been changed into sentiments and acts of kindness,
much above my merits. With the most sincere feelings of gratitude to God, I
said with the old prophet, "Bless the Lord, O my soul."
By the great mercy of God that parish of Beauport, which at first had appeared
to me as a bottomless abyss in which I was to perish, had been changed for me
into an earthly paradise. There was only one desire in my heart. It was that I
never should be removed from it. Like Peter on Mount Tabor, I wanted to pitch
my tent in Beauport to the end of my life. But the rebuke which had shamed
Peter came as quickly as lightning to show me the folly and vanity of my
dreams.
Suddenly the carosse of the Bishop of Quebec came in sight, and rolled down to
the door of the parsonage. The sub-secretary, the Rev. Mr. Belisle, alighting
from it, directed his steps towards the garden, where he had seen me, and
handed me the following letter from the Right Rev. Turgeon, Coadjutor of
Quebec:
My Dear Mons. Chiniquy:
His lordship Bishop Signaie and I wish to confer with you on a most important
matter. We have sent our carriage to bring you to Quebec. Please come without
the least delay.
Truly yours,
Flav. Turgeon.
One
hour after, I was with the two bishops. My Lord Signaie said:
"Monseigneur Turgeon will tell you why we have sent for you in such haste."
"Mons. Chiniquy," said Bishop Turgeon, "is not Kamouraska your
birthplace?"
"Yes, my lord."
"Do you like that place, and do you interest yourself much in its
welfare?"
"Of course, my lord, I like Kamouraska; not only because it is my
birthplace, and the most happy hours of my youth were spent in it, but also
because, in my humble opinion, the beauties of its scenery, the purity of its
atmosphere, the fine manners and proverbial intelligence of its people, make it
the very gem of Canada."
"You know," rejoined the bishop, "that Rev. Mons. Varin has been
too infirm, these last years, to superintend the spiritual interest of that
important place, it is impossible to continue putting a young vicar at the head
of such a parish, where hundreds of the best families of our aristocracy of
Quebec and Montreal resort every summer. We have, too long, tried that
experiment of young priests in the midst of such a people. It has been a
failure. Drunkenness, luxury, and immoralities of the most degrading kind are eating
up the very life of Kamouraska today. Not less than thirty illegitimate births
are known and registered in different places from Kamouraska these last twelve
months. It is quite time to stop that state of affairs, and you are the only
one, Mons. Chiniquy, on whom we can rely for that great and difficult
work."
These last words passed through my soul as a two-edged sword. My lips quivered,
I felt as if I were choking, and my tongue, with difficulty muttered: "My
lord, I hope it is not your intention to remove me from my dear parish of
Beauport."
"No, Mons. Chiniquy, we will not make use of our authority to break the
sacred and sweet ties which unite you to the parish of Beauport. But we will
put before your conscience the reasons we have to wish you at the head of the
great and important parish of Kamouraska."
For more than an hour the two bishops made strong appeals to my charity for the
multitudes who were sunk into the abyss of drunkenness and every vice, and had
no one to save them.
"See how God and men are blessing you today," added the Archbishop
Signaie, "for what you have done in Beauport! Will they not bless you
still more, if you save that great and splendid parish of Kamouraska, as you
have saved Beauport? Will not a double crown be put upon your forehead by your
bishops, your country, and your God, if you consent to be the instrument of the
mercies of God towards the people of your own birthplace, and the surrounding
country, as you have just been for Beauport and its surrounding parishes? Can
you rest and live in peace now in Beauport, when you hear day and night the
voice of the multitudes, who cry: 'Come to our help, we are perishing'? What
will you answer to God, at the last day, when He will show you the thousands of
precious souls lost at Kamouraska, because you refused to go to their rescue?
As Monseigneur Turgeon has said, we will not make use of our authority to force
you to leave your present position; we hope that the prayers of your bishops
will be enough for you. We know what a great sacrifice it will be for you to
leave Beauport today; but do not forget that the greater the sacrifice, the
more precious will the crown be."
My bishops had spoken to me with such kindness! Their paternal and friendly
appeals had surely more power over me than orders. Not without many tears, but
with a true good will, I consented to give up the prospects of peace and
comfort which were in store for me in Beauport, to plunge myself again into a
future of endless troubles and warfare, by going to Kamouraska.
There is no need of saying that the people of Beauport did all in their power
to induce the bishops to let me remain among them some time longer. But the
sacrifice had to be made. I gave my farewell address on the second Sabbath of
September, in the midst of indescribable cries, sobs, and tears; and on the
17th of the same month, I was on my way to Kamouraska. I had left everything
behind me at Beauport, even to my books, in order to be freer in that
formidable conflict which seemed to be in store for me in my new parish. When I
took leave of the Bishop of Quebec, they showed me a letter just received by
them from Mons. Varin, filled with the most bitter expressions of indignation
on account of the choice of such a fanatic and firebrand as Chiniquy, for a
place as well known for its peaceful habits and harmony among all classes. The
last words of the letter were as follows:
"The clergy and people of Kamouraska and vicinity consider the appointment
of Mons. Chiniquy to this parish as an insult, and we hope and pray that your
lordship may change your mind on the subject."
In showing me the letter, my lords Signaie and Turgeon said: "We fear that
you will have more trouble than we expected with the old curate and his
partisans, but we commend you to the grace of God and the protection of the
Virgin Mary, remembering that our Saviour has said: 'Be of good cheer; I have
overcome the world'" (John xvi. 33).
I arrived at Kamouraska the 21st of September, 1842, on one of the finest days
of the year.
But my heart was filled with an unspeakable desolation, for all along the way
the curates had told me that the people, with their old pastor, were unanimous
in their opposition to my going there. It was even rumoured that the doors of
the church would be shut against me the next Sunday. To this bad news were
added two very strange facts. My brother Achilles, who was living at St.
Michael, was to drive me from that place to St. Roch des Aulnets, whence my
other brother Louis, would take me to Kamouraska. But we had not traveled more
than five or six miles, when the wheel of the newly-finished and beautifully
painted buggy, having struck a stone, the seat was broken into fragments, and
we both fell to the ground.
By chance, as my brother was blessing the man who had sold him that rig for a
new and first-class conveyance, a traveler going the same way passed by. I
asked him for a place in his caleche, bade adieu to my brother, and consoled
him by saying: "As you have lost your fine buggy in my service, I will give
you a better one."
Two days after, my second brother was driving me to my destination, and when
about three or four miles from Kamouraska, his fine horse stepped on a long
nail which was on the road, fell down and died in the awful convulsions of
tetanus. I took leave of him, and consoled him also by promising to give him
another horse.
Another carriage took me safely to the end of my journey. However, having to
pass by the church, which was about two hundred yards from the parsonage, I
dismissed my driver at the door of the sacred edifice, and took my satchel in
hand, which was my only baggage, entered the church, and spent more than an
hour in fervent prayers, or rather in cries and tears. I felt so heart-sick
that I needed that hour of rest and prayer. The tears I shed there relieved my
burdened spirit.
A few steps from me, in the cemetery, lay the sacred remains of my beloved
mother, whose angelic face and memory were constantly before me. Facing me was
the altar where I had made my first communion; at my left was the pulpit which
was to be the battlefield where I had to fight the enemies of my people and of
my God, who, I had been repeatedly told, were cursing and grinding their teeth
at me. But the vision of that old curate I had soon to confront, and who had
written such an impudent letter against me to the bishops, and the public
opposition of the surrounding priests to my coming into their midst, were the
most discouraging aspects of my new position. I felt as if my soul had been
crushed. My very existence seemed an unbearable burden.
My new responsibilities came so vividly before my mind in that distressing
hour, that my courage for a moment failed me. I reproached myself for the act
of folly in yielding to the request of the bishops. It seemed evident that I
had accepted a burden too heavy for me to bear. But I prayed with all the
fervour of my soul to God and to the Virgin Mary, and wept to my heart's
content.
There is a marvelous power in the prayers and tears which come from the heart.
I felt like a new man. I seemed to hear the trumpet of God calling me to the
battlefield. My only business then was to go and fight, relying on Him alone
for victory. I took my traveling bag, went out of the church and walked slowly
towards the parsonage, which has been burnt since. It was a splendid two-storey
building, eighty feet in length, with capacious cellars. It had been built
shortly after the conquest of Canada, as a store for contraband goods; but
after a few years of failure became the parsonage of the parish.
The Rev. Mons. Varin, though infirm and sick, had watched me from his window,
and felt bewildered at my entering the church and remaining so long.
I knocked at the first door, but as nobody answered, I opened it, and crossed
the first large room to knock at the second door; but, here also, no answer
came except from two furious little dogs. I entered the room, fighting the
dogs, which bit me several times. I knocked at the third and fourth doors with
the same results no one to receive me.
I knew that the next was the old curate's sleeping room. At my knocking, an
angry voice called out: "Walk in."
I entered, made a step toward the old and infirm curate, who was sitting in his
large arm-chair. As I was about to salute him, he angrily said: "The people
of Beauport have made great efforts to keep you in their midst, but the people
of Kamouraska will make as great efforts to turn you out of this place."
"Mon. le Cure," I answered calmly, "God knoweth that I never
desired to leave Beauport for the is place. But I think it is that great and
merciful God who has brought me here by the hand; and I hope He will help me to
overcome all opposition, from whatever quarter it may come."
He replied angrily: "Is it to insult me that you call me 'Mons. le Cure?'
I am no more the curate of Kamouraska. You are the curate now, Mr.
Chiniquy."
"I beg your pardon, my dear Mr. Varin; you are still, I hope you will
remain all your life, the honoured and beloved curate of Kamouraska. The
respect and gratitude I owe you have caused me to refuse the titles and honours
which our bishop wanted to give me."
"But, then, if I am the curate, what are you?" replied the old
priest, with more calmness.
"I am nothing but a simple soldier of Christ, and a sower of the good seed
of the Gospel!" I answered. "When I fight the common enemy in the
plain, as Joshua did, you, like Moses, will stand on the top of the mountain,
lift up your hands to heaven, send your prayers to the mercy seat, and we will
gain the day. Then both will bless the God of our salvation for the
victory."
"Well! well! this is beautiful, grand, and sublime," said the old
priest, with a voice filled with friendly emotions. "But whence is your
household furniture, your library?"
"My household furniture," I answered, "is in this little bag,
which I hold in my hand. I do not want any of my books as long as I have the
pleasure and honour to be with the good Mons. Varin, who will allow me, I am
sure of it, to ransack his splendid library, and study his rare and learned
books."
"But what rooms do you wish to occupy?" rejoined the good old curate.
"As the parsonage is yours and not mine," I answered, "please
tell me where you want me to sleep and rest. I will accept, with gratitude, any
room you will offer me, even if it were in your cellar or granary. I do not
want to bother you in any way. When I was young, a poor orphan in your parish,
some twenty years ago, were you not a father to me? Please continue to look
upon me as your own child, for I have always loved and considered you as a
father, and I still do the same. Were you not my guide and adviser in my first
steps in the ways of God? Please continue to be my guide and adviser to the end
of your life. My only ambition is to be your right-hand man, and to learn from
your old experience and your sincere piety, how to live and work as a good
priest of Jesus Christ." I had not finished the last sentence when the old
man burst into tears, threw himself into my arms, pressed me to his heart,
bathed me with his tears, and said, with a voice half-suffocated by his sobs:
"Dear Mr. Chiniquy, forgive me the evil things I have written and said
about you. You are welcome in my parsonage, and I bless God to have sent me
such a young friend, who will help me to carry the burden of my old age."
I then handed him the bishop's letter, which had confirmed all I had said about
my mission of peace towards him.
From that day to his death, which occurred six months after, I never had a more
sincere friend than Mr. Varin.
I thanked God, who had enabled me at once, not only to disarm the chief of my
opponents, but to transform him into my most sincere and devoted friend. My
hope was that the people would soon follow their chief and be reconciled to me,
but I did not expect that this would be so soon and from such a unforeseen and
unexpected cause.
The principal reason the people had to oppose my coming to Kamouraska was that
I was the nephew of the Hon. Amable Dionne, who had made a colossal fortune at
their expense. The Rev. Mr. Varin, who was always in debt, was also forced by
the circumstances, to buy everything, both for himself and the church, from
him, and had to pay without murmur the most exorbitant prices for everything.
In that way, the church and the curate, though they had very large revenues,
had never enough to clear their accounts. When the people heard that the nephew
of Mons. Dionne was their curate, they said to each other: "Now our poor
church is for ever ruined, for the nephew will, still more than the curate,
favour his uncle, and the uncle will be less scrupulous than ever in asking
more unreasonable prices for his merchandise." They felt they had more
than fallen from Charybdis into Scylla.
The very next day after my arrival, the beadle told me that the church needed a
few yards of cotton for some repairs, and asked me if he would not go, as
usual, to Mr. Dionne's store. I told him to go there first, ask the price of
that article, and then go to the other stores, ordering him to buy at the
cheapest one. Thirty cents was asked at Mr. Dionne's, and only fifteen cents at
Mr. St. Pierre's; of course, we bought at the latter's store.
The day was not over, before this apparently insignificant fact was known all
over the parish, and was taking the most extraordinary and unforeseen proportions.
Farmers would meet with their neighbours and congratulate themselves that, at
last, the yoke imposed upon them by the old curate and Mr. Dionne, was broken;
that the taxes they had to pay the store were at an end, with the monopoly
which had cost them so much money. Many came to Mr. St. Pierre to hear from his
own lips that their new curate had, at once, freed them from what they
considered the long and ignominious bondage, against which they had so often
but so vainly protested. For the rest of this week this was the only subject of
conversation. They congratulated themselves that they had, at last, a priest
with such an independent and honest mind, that he would not do them any
injustice even to please a relative in whose house he had spent the years of
his childhood. This simple act of fair play towards that people won over their
affection. Only one little dark spot remained in their minds against me. They
had been told that the only subject on which I could preach was: Rum, whiskey,
and drunkenness. And it seemed to them exceedingly tedious to hear nothing else
from the curate, particularly when they were more than ever determined to
continue drinking their social glasses of brandy, rum, and wine.
There was an immense crowd at church, the next Sunday. My text was: "As
the Father has love Me, so have I loved you" (John xv. 9). Showing them
how Jesus had proved that He was their friend. But their sentiments of piety
and pleasure at what they had heard were nothing compared to their surprise
when they saw that I preached nearly an hour without saying a word on whiskey,
rum or beer. People are often compared to the waters of the sea, in the Holy
Scriptures. When you see the roaring waves dashing on that rock today, as if
they wanted to demolish it, do not fear that this fury will last long. The very
next day, if the wind has changed, the same waters will leave that rock alone,
to spend their fury on the opposite rock. So it was in Kamouraska. They were
full of indignation and wrath when I set my feet in their midst; but a few days
later, those very men would have given the last drop of their blood to protect
me. The dear Saviour had evidently seen the threatening storm which was to
destroy His poor unprofitable servant. He had heard the roaring waves which
were dashing against me. So He came down and bid the storm "be still"
and the waves be calm.
.
CHAPTER 40
Two
days after my arrival at Kamouraska, I received a letter from the surrounding
priests, at the head of whom was the Grand Vicar Mailloux, expressing the hope
that I would not try to form any temperance society in my new parish, as I had
done in Beauport; for the good reasons they said, that drunkenness was not
prevailing in that part of Canada, as it was in the city of Quebec. I answered
them, politely, that so long as I should be at the head of this new parish, I
would try, as I had ever done, to mind my own business, and I hoped that my
neighbouring friends would do the same. Not long after, I saw that the curates
felt ashamed of their vain attempt to intimidate me. The next Sabbath, the
crowd was greater than at the first. Having heard that the merchants were to
start the next day, with their schooners, to buy their winter provisions or
rum, I said, in a very solemn way, before my sermon:
"My friends, I know that, to-morrow, the merchants leave for Quebec to
purchase their rum. Let me advise them, as their best friend, not to buy any;
and as the ambassador of Christ, I forbid them to bring a single drop of those
poisonous drinks here. It will surely be their ruin, if they pay no attention
to this friendly advice; for they will not sell a single drop of it, after next
Sabbath. That day, I will show to the intelligent people of this parish, that
rum and all the other drugs, sold here, under the name of brandy, wine, and
beer, are nothing else than disgusting, deadly, and cursed poisons."
I then preached on the words of our Saviour: "Be ye also ready; for in
such an hour as ye think not, the Son of Man cometh: (Matt. xxiv. 44). Though
the people seemed much pleased and impressed by that second sermon, they felt
exceedingly irritated at my few warning words to the merchants. When the
service was over, they all rallied around the merchants to tell them not to
mind what they had heard.
"If our young curate," said they, "thinks he will lead us by the
nose, as he has done with the drunkards of Beauport, he will soon see his
mistake. Instead of one hundred tons, as you brought last fall, bring us two
hundred, this year; we will drink them to his health. We have a good crop and
we want to spend a jolly winter."
It is probable that the church of Kamouraska had never seen within its walls
such a crowd as on the second Sabbath of October, 1842. It was literally
crammed. Curiosity had attracted the people who, not less eager to hear my
first sermon against rum, than to see the failure they expected, and wished, of
my first efforts to form a temperance society. Long before the public service,
at the door of the church, as well as during the whole preceding week, the
people had pledged themselves never to give up their strong drink, and never to
join the temperance society. But what are the resolutions of man against God?
Is He not their master? The half of that first sermon on temperance was not
heard, when that whole multitude had forgotten their public promises. The
hearts were not only touched they were melted and changed by God, who wanted to
show, once more, that His works of mercy were above all the works of His hands.
From the very day of my arrival in Kamouraska, I had made a serious and exact
inquiry about the untold miseries brought upon the people by intoxicating
drinks. I had found that, during the last twenty years, twelve men had been
drowned and eight had been frozen to death, who had left twenty widows and
sixty orphans in the most distressing poverty. Sixty farmers had lost their
lands and had been obliged to emigrate to other places, where they were
suffering all the pangs of poverty from the drunkenness of their parents;
several other families had their properties mortgaged for their whole value to
the rum merchants, and were expected, every day, to be turned out from their
inheritances, to pay their rum bills. Seven mothers had died in delirium
tremens, one had hung herself, another drowned herself when drunk. One hundred
thousand dollars had been paid to the rum merchants during the last fifteen
years. Two hundred thousand more were due to the storekeeper; threefourths of
which were for strong drink. Four men had been murdered, among whom was their
landlord, Achilles Tache, through their drunken habits!
When I had recapitulated all these facts, which were public and undeniable, and
depicted the desolation of the ruined families, composed of their own brothers,
sisters, and dear children; when I brought before their minds, the tears of the
widows, the cries of the starving and naked children, the shame of the
families, the red hand of the murderers and the mangled bodies of their
victims; the eternal cries of the lost from drunkenness, the broken-hearted
fathers and mothers whose children had been destroyed by strong drink; when I
proved to them that there was not a single one in their midst who had not
suffered, either in his own person, or in that of his father or mother,
brothers, sisters or children yes, when I had given them the simple and awful
story of the crimes committed in their midst; the ruin and deaths, the misery
of thousands of precious souls for whom Christ died in vain, the church was
filled with such sobs and cries that I often could not be heard. Many times my
voice was drowned by the indescribable confusion and lamentation of that whole
multitude. Unable to contain myself, several times I stopped and mingled my
sobs and cries with those of my people.
When the sermon, which lasted two hours, was finished, I asked all those who
were determined to help me in stopping the ravages of intoxicating drinks, in
drying the tears which they caused to flow, and saving the precious souls they
were destroying, to come forward and take the public pledge of temperance by
kissing a crucifix which I held in my hand. Thirteen hundred and ten came. Not
fifty of the people had refused to enroll themselves under the blessed and
glorious banners of temperance! and these few recalcitrants came forward, with a
very few exceptions, the next time I spoke on the subject.
The very same day, the wives of the merchants sent dispatches to their husbands
in Quebec, to tell them what had been done, and not a single barrel of
intoxicating drinks was brought by them. The generous example of the admirable
people of Kamouraska spoke with an irresistible eloquence to the other parishes
of that district, and before long, the banners of temperance floated over all
the populations of St. Pascal, St. Andrew, Isle Verte, Cacouna, Riviere du
Loup, Rimouski, Matane, St. Anne, St. Roch, Madawaska, St. Benoit, St. Luce,
ect., on the south side of the St. Lawrence, and the Eboulements, La Malbaye,
and the other parishes on the north side of the river; and the people kept
their pledge with such fidelity that the trade in rum was literally killed in
that part of Canada, as it had been in Beauport and its vicinity.
The blessed fruits of this reform were soon felt and seen everywhere, in the
public prosperity and the spread of education. Kamouraska, which was owing two
hundred thousand dollars to the merchants in 1842, had not only paid its
interest, but had reduced its debt to one hundred thousand, when I left it to
go to Montreal in 1846. God only knows my joy at these admirable manifestations
of His mercies towards my country. However, the joys of man are never without
their mixture of sadness.
In the good providence of God, being invited by all the curates to establish
temperance societies among their people, I had the sad opportunity, as no
priest ever had in Canada, to know the secret and public scandals of each
parish. When I went to the Eboulements, on the north side of the river, invited
by the Rev. Noel Toussignant, I learned from the very lips of that young
priest, and the ex-priest Tetreau, the history of the most shameful scandals.
In 1830, a young priest of Quebec, called Derome, had fallen in love with one
of his young female penitents of Vercheres, where he had preached a few days,
and he had persuaded her to follow him to the parsonage of Quebec. The better
to conceal their iniquity from the public, he persuaded his victim to dress
herself as a young man, and throw her dress into the river, to make her parents
and the whole parish believe that she was drowned. I had seen her many times at
the parsonage of Quebec, under the name of Joseph, and had much admired her
refined manners, though more than once I was very much inclined to think that
the smart Joseph was no one else than a lost girl. But the respect I had for
the curate of Quebec (who was the coadjutor of the bishop) and his young
vicars, caused me to reject those suspicions as unfounded. However many even
among the first citizens of the city had the same suspicions, and they pressed
me to go to the coadjutor and warn him; but I refused, and told those gentlemen
to do that delicate work themselves, and they did it.
The position of that high dignitary and his vicar was not then a very agreeable
one. Their bark had evidently drifted into dangerous waters. To keep Joseph among
themselves was impossible, after the friendly advice from such high quarters,
and to dismiss him was not less dangerous. He knew too well how the curate of
Quebec, with his vicars, were keeping their vows of celibacy, to dismiss him
without danger to themselves; a single word from his lips would destroy them.
Happily for them, Mr. Clement, then curate of the Eboulements, was in search of
such a servant, and took him to his parsonage, after persuading the
bishopcoadjutor to give Joseph a large sum of money to seal his lips.
Things went on pretty smoothly between Joseph and the priest for several years,
till some suspicions arose in the minds of the sharp-sighted people of the
parish, who told the curate that it would be safer and more honourable for him to
get rid of his servant. In order to put an end to those suspicions, and to
retain him in the parsonage, the curate persuaded him to marry the daughter of
a poor neighbour.
The banns were published three times, and the two girls were duly married by
the curate, who continued his criminal intimacies, in the hope that no one
would trouble him any more on that subject. But not long after he was removed
to La Petite Riviere, and in 1838 the Rev. M. Tetreau was appointed curate of
the Eboulements. This new priest, knowing of the abominations which his
predecessor had practiced, continued to employ Joseph. One day, when Joseph was
working at the gate of the parsonage, in the presence of several people, a
stranger came and asked him if Mr. Tetreau was at home.
"Yes, sir, Mr. Curate is at home," answered Joseph; "but as you
seem a stranger to the place, would you allow me to ask you from what parish
you come?"
"I am not ashamed of my parish," answered the stranger. "I come
from Vercheres."
At the word "Vercheres," Joseph turned so pale that the stranger was
puzzled. He looked carefully at him, and exclaimed:
"Oh! my God! What do I see here? Genevieve! Genevieve! over whom we have
mourned so long as drowned! Here you are disguised as a man!"
"Dear uncle" (it was her uncle); "for God's sake, not a word
more here!"
But it was too late; the people who were there had heard the uncle and the
niece. Their long and secret suspicions were well-founded. One of their former
priests had kept a girl, under the disguise of a man, in his house; and to
blind his people more thoroughly, he had married that girl to another, in order
to have them both in his house when he pleased, without awakening any
suspicion!
The news went, almost as quickly as lightning, from one end to the other of the
parish, and spread all over the country, on both sides of the St. Lawrence. I
had heard of that horror, but could not believe it. However, I had to believe
it, when, on the spot, I heard from the lips of the ex-curate, M. Tetreau, and
the new curate, M. Noel Toussignant, and from the lips of the landlord, the
Honourable Laterriere, the following details, which had come to light only a
short time before.
The justice of the peace had investigated the matter, in the name of public
morality. Joseph was brought before the magistrates, who decided that a
physician should be charged to make, not a post-mortem, but an ante-mortem
inquest. The Honourable Laterriere, who made the inquest, declared that Joseph
was a girl, and the bonds of marriage were legally dissolved.
At the same time, the curate M. Tetreau, had sent a dispatch to the Right Rev.
Bishop-coadjutor of Quebec, informing him that the young man whom he had kept
in his house, several years, was legally proved a girl; a fact which, I need
hardly state, was well-known by the bishop and his vicars! They immediately
sent a trustworthy man with $500, to induce the girl to leave the country
without delay, lest she should be prosecuted and sent to the penitentiary. She
accepted the offer, and crossed the lines to the United States with her two
thousand dollars, where she was soon married, and where she still lives.
I wished that this story had never been told me, or at least, that I might be
allowed to doubt some of its circumstances; but there was no help. I was forced
to acknowledge that in my Church of Rome, there was such corruption from head
to foot, which could scarcely be surpassed in Sodom. I remember what the Rev.
Mr. Perras had told me of the tears and desolation of Bishop Plessis, when he had
discovered that all the priests of Canada, with the exception of three, were
atheists.
I should not be honest, did I not confess that the personal knowledge of that
fact, which I learned in all its scandalous details from the very lips of
unimpeachable witnesses, saddened me, and for a time, shook my faith in my
religion, to its foundation. I felt secretly ashamed to belong to a body of men
so completely lost to every sense of honesty, as the priests and bishops of
Canada. I had heard of many scandals before. The infamies of the Grand Vicar
Manceau and Quiblier of Montreal, Cadieux at Three Rivers, and Viau at Riviere
Oulle; the public acts of depravity of the priests Lelievre, Tabeau, Pouliot,
Belisle, Brunet, Quevillon, Huot, Lajuste, Rabby, Crevier, Bellecourt, Valle,
Nignault, Noel, Pinet, Duguez, Davely and many others, were known by me, as
well as by the whole clergy. But the abominations of which Joseph was the
victim seemed to overstep the conceivable limits of infamy. For the first time,
I sincerely regretted that I was a priest. The priesthood of Rome seemed then,
to me, the very fulfillment of the prophecy of Revelation, about the great
prostitute who made the nations drunk with wine of her prostitution (Rev. xvii.
1 5).
Auricular confession, which I knew to be the first, if not the only cause, of
these abominations, appeared to me, what it really is, a school of perdition
for the priest and his female penitents. The priest's oath of celibacy was, to
my eyes, in those hours of distress, but a shameful mask to conceal a
corruption which was unknown in the most depraved days of old paganism. New and
bright lights came, then, before my mind which, had I followed them, would have
guided me to the truth of the gospel. But I was blind! The Good Master had not
yet touched my eyes with His divine and life-giving hand. I had no idea that
there could be any other church than the Church of Rome in which I could be
saved. I was, however, often saying to myself: "How can I hope to conquer
on a battlefield where so many, as strong and even much stronger than I am,
have perished?"
I felt no longer at peace. My soul was filled with trouble and anxiety. I not
only distrusted myself, but I lost confidence in the rest of the priests and
bishops. In fact, I could not see any one in whom I could trust. Though my
beautiful and dear parish of Kamouraska was, more than ever, overwhelming me
with tokens of its affection, gratitude, and respect, it had lost its
attraction for me. To whatever side I turned my eyes, I saw nothing but the
most seducing examples of perversion.It seemed as if I were surrounded by
numberless snares, from which it was impossible to escape. I wished to depart
from this deceitful and lost world.
When my soul was as drowned under the waves of a bitter sea, the Rev. Mr.
Guignes, Superior of the Monastery of the Fathers of Oblates of Mary
Immaculate, at Longueil, near Montreal, came to pass a few days with me, for
the benefit of his health. I spoke to him of that shameful scandal, and did not
conceal from him that my courage failed me, when I looked at the torrent of
iniquity which was sweeping everything, under our eyes, with an irresistible
force. "We are here alone, in the presence of God," I said to him.
"I confess that I feel an unspeakable horror at the moral ruin which I see
everywhere in our church. My priesthood, of which I was so proud till lately,
seems to me, today, the most ignominious yoke, when I see it dragged in the mud
of the most infamous vices, not only by the immense majority of the priests,
but even by our bishops. How can I hope to save myself, when I see so many,
stronger than I am, perishing all around me?"
The Reverend Superior, with the kindness of a father and becoming gravity,
answered me: "I understand your fears, perfectly. They are legitimate and
too well-founded. Like you, I am a priest; and like you, if not more than you,
I know the numberless and formidable dangers which surround the priest. It is
because I know them too well, that I have not dared to be a secular priest a
single day. I knew the humiliating and disgraceful history of Joseph and the
coadjutor Bishop of Quebec. Nay! I know many things still more horrible and
unspeakable which I have learned when preaching and hearing confessions in
France and in Canada. My fear is that, today, there are not many more undefiled
souls among the priests than in Sodom, in the days of Lot. The fact is, that it
is morally impossible for a secular priest to keep his vows of celibacy, except
by a miracle of the grace of God. Our holy church would be a modern Sodom long
ago, had not our merciful God granted her the grace that many of her priests
have always enrolled themselves among the armies of the regular priests in the
different religious orders which are, to the church, what the ark was to Noah
and his children in the days of the deluge. Only the priests whom God calls, in
His mercy, to become members of any of those orders, are safe. For they are
under the paternal care and surveillance of superiors whose zeal and charity
are like a shield to protect them. Their holy and strict laws are like strong
walls and high towers which the enemy cannot storm."
He then spoke to me, with an irresistible eloquence, of the peace of soul which
a regular priest enjoys within the walls of his monastery. He represented, in
the most attractive colours, the spiritual and constant joys of the heart which
one feels when living, day and night, under the eyes of a superior to whom he
has vowed a perfect submission. He added, "Your providential work is finished
in the diocese of Quebec. The temperance societies are established almost
everywhere. We are in need of your long experience and your profound studies on
that subject in the diocese of Montreal. It is true that the good Bishop de
Nancy had done what he could to support that holy cause, but, though he is
working with the utmost zeal, he has not studies that subject enough to make a
lasting impression on the people. Come with us. We are more than thirty
priests, Oblates of Mary Immaculate, who will be too happy to second your
efforts in that noble work, which is too much for one man alone. Moreover, you
cannot do justice to your great parish of Kamouraska and to the temperance
cause together. You must give up one, to consecrate yourself to the other. Take
courage, my young friend! Offer to God the sacrifice of your dear Kamouraska,
as you made the sacrifice of your beautiful Beauport, some years ago, for the
good of Canada and in the interest of the Church, which calls you to its
help."
It seemed to me that I could oppose no reasonable argument to these
considerations. I fell on my knees, and made the sacrifice of my beautiful and
precious Kamouraska. The last Sabbath of September I gave my farewell address
to the dear and intelligent people of Kamouraska, to go to Longueil and become
a novice of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate.
.
CHAPTER 41
The
year 1843 will be long remembered in the Church of Rome for the submission of
Dr. Newman to her authority. This was considered by many Roman Catholics as one
of the greatest triumphs ever gained by their church against Protestantism. But
some of us, more acquainted with the daily contradictions and tergiversations
of the Oxford divine, could not associate ourselves in the public rejoicings of
our church.
From almost the very beginning of his public life, Dr. Newman as well as Dr.
Pusey appeared to many of us as cowards and traitors in the Protestant camp,
whose object was to betray the church which was feeding them, and which they
were sworn to defend. They both seemed to us to be skillful but dishonest
conspirators.
Dr. Newman, caught in the very act of that conspiracy, has boldly denied it.
Brought before the tribunal of public opinion as a traitor who, though enrolled
under the banners of the Church of England, was giving help and comfort to its
foe, the Church of Rome, he has published a remarkable book under the title of
"apologia pro vita sua," to exculpate himself. I hold in my hands the
New York edition of 1865. Few men will read that book from beginning to end;
and still fewer will understand it at its first reading. The art of throwing
dust in the eyes of the public is brought to perfection in that work. I have
read many books in my long life, but I have never met with anything like the
Jesuit ability shown by Dr. Newman in giving a colour of truth to the most
palpable errors and falsehoods. I have had to read it at least four times, with
the utmost attention, before being sure of having unlocked all its dark corners
and sophistries.
That we may be perfectly fair towards Dr. Newman, let us forget what his
adversaries have written against him, and let us hear only what he says in his
own defense. Here it is. I dare say that his most bitter enemies could never
have been able to write a book so damaging against him as this one, which he
has given us for his apology.
Let me tell the reader at once that I, with many other priests of Rome, felt at
first an unspeakable joy at the reading of many of the "Tracts for the
Times." It is true that we keenly felt the blows Dr. Newman was giving us
now and then; but we were soon consoled by the more deadly blows which he was
striking at his own Church the Church of England. Besides that, it soon became
evident that the more he was advancing in his controversial work, the nearer he
was coming to us. We were not long without saying to each other: "Dr.
Newman is evidently, though secretly, for us; he is a Roman Catholic at heart,
and will soon join us. It is only from want of moral courage and honesty that
he remains a Protestant."
But from the very beginning there was a cloud in my mind, and in the minds of
many other of my co-priests, about him. His contradictions were so numerous,
his sudden transitions from one side to the other extreme, when speaking of
Romanism and Anglicanism; his eulogiums of our Church today, and his abuses of
it the very next day; his expressions of love and respect for his own Church in
one tract, so suddenly followed by the condemnation of her dearest doctrines
and practices in the next, caused many others, as well as myself, to suspect
that he had no settled principles, or faith in any religion.
What was my surprise, when reading this strange book, I found that my
suspicions were too well founded; that Dr. Newman was nothing else than one of
those free-thinkers who had no real faith in any of the secret dogmas he was
preaching, and on which he was writing so eloquently! What was my astonishment
when, in 1865, I read in his own book the confession made by that unfortunate
man that he was nothing else but a giant weathercock, when the whole people of
England were looking upon him as one of the most sincere and learned ministers
of the Gospel. Here in his own confession, pages 111, 112. Speaking of the
years he had spent in the Episcopal Church as a minister, he says: "Alas!
It was my portion, for whole years, to remain without any satisfactory basis
for my religious profession; in a state of moral sickness, neither able to
acquiesce in Anglicanism, or able to go to Rome!" This is Cardinal Newman,
painted by himself! He tells us how miserable he was when an Episcopalian
minister, by feeling that his religion had no basis no foundation!
hat is a preacher of religion who feels that he has no basis, no foundation, no
reason to believe in that religion? Is he not that blind man of whom Christ
speaks, "who leads other blind men into the ditch?"
Note it is not Rev. Charles Kingsley; it is not any of the able Protestant
controversialists; it is not even the old Chiniquy who says that Dr. Newman was
nothing else but an unbeliever, when the Protestant people were looking upon
him as one of their most pious and sincere Christian theologians. It is Dr.
Newman himself who, without suspecting it, is forced by the marvelous
providence of God to reveal that deplorable fact in his "Apologia pro vita
sua."
Now, what was the opinion entertained by him on the high and low sections of
his church? Here are his very words, p. 91: "As to the High Church and the
Low Church, I thought that the one had not much more of a logical basis than
the other; while I had a thorough contempt for the Evangelical!" But
please observe that, when this minister of the Church of England had found,
with the help of Dr. Pusey, that this church had no logical basis, and that he
had a "thorough contempt for the Evangelical," he kept a firm and
continuous hold upon the living which he was enjoying from day to day. Nay, it
is when paid by his church to preach her doctrines and fight her battles, that
he set at work to raise another church! Of course, the new church was to have a
firm basis of logic, history, and the Gospel: the new church was to be worthy
of the British people it was to be the modern ark to save the perishing world!
The reader will, perhaps, think I am joking, and that I am caricaturing Dr.
Newman. No! the hour in which we live is too solemn to be spent in jokes it is
rather with tears and sobs that we must approach the subject. Here are the very
words of Dr. Newman about the new church he wished to build after demolishing
the Church of England as established by law. He says (page 116): "I have
said enough on what I consider to have been the general objects of the various
works which I wrote, edited, or prompted in the years which I am reviewing. I
wanted to bring out in a substantive form a living Church of England, in a
position proper to herself and founded on distinct principles; as far as paper
could do it, and as earnestly preaching it and influencing others towards it
could tend to make it a fact; a living church, made of flesh and blood, with
voice, complexion, motion, and action, and a will of its own." If I had
not said that these words were written by Dr. Newman, would the reader have
suspected?
What is to be the name of the new church? Dr. Newman himself called it
"Via Media." As the phrase indicates, it was to stand between the
rival Churches of England and Rome, and it was to be built with the materials
taken, as much as possible, from the ruins of both.
The first thing to be done was, then, to demolish that huge, illogical, unscriptural,
unchristian church restored by the English Reformers. Dr. Newman bravely set to
work, under the eye and direction of Dr. Pusey. His merciless hammer was heard
almost day and night, from 1833 to 1843, striking alternately with hard blows,
now against the church of the Pope, whom he called Antichrist, and then against
his own church, which he was, very soon, to find still more corrupted and
defiled than its anti-Christian rival. For as he was proceeding in his work of
demolition, he tells us that he found more clearly, every day, that the
materials and the foundations of the Church of Rome were exceedingly better
than those of his own. He then determined to give a coup de grace to the Church
of England, and strike such a blow that her walls would be for ever pulverized.
His perfidious Tract XC. aims at this object.
Nothing can surpass the ability and the pious cunning with which Dr. Newman
tries to conceal his shameful conspiracy in his "Apologia."
Hear the un-British and unmanly excuses which he gives for having deceived his
readers, when he was looked upon as the most reliable theologian of the day, in
defense of the doctrines of the Church of England. In pages 236 7 he says:
"How could I ever hope to make them believe in a second theology, when I
had cheated them in the first? With what face could I publish a new edition of
a dogmatic creed, and ask them to receive it as gospel? Would it not be plain
to them that no certainty was to be found anywhere? Well, in my defense I could
but make a lame apology; however, it was the true one, viz., that I had not
read the Fathers critically enough; that in such nice points as those which
determine the angle of divergence between the two churches, I had made
considerable miscalculations; and how came this about? Why, the fact was,
unpleasant as it was to avow, that I had leaned too much upon the assertions of
Usher, Jeremy Taylor, or Barrow, and had been deceived by them."
Here is a specimen of the learning and honesty of the great Oxford divine! Dr.
Newman confesses that when he was telling his people, "St. Augustine says
this, St. Jerome says that" when he assured them that St. Gregory
supported this doctrine, and Origen that, it was all false. Those holy fathers
had never taught such doctrines. It was Usher, Taylor, and Barrow who were
citing them, and they had deceived him!
Is it not a strange thing that such a shrewd man as Dr. Newman should have so
completely destroyed his own good name in the very book he wrote, with so much
care and ingenuity, to defend himself? One remains confounded he can hardly
believe his own eyes at such want of honesty in such a man. It is evident that
his mind was troubled at the souvenir of such a course of procedure. But he
wanted to excuse himself by saying it was the fault of Usher, Taylor, and
Barrow!
Are we not forcibly brought to the solemn and terrible drama in the Garden of
Eden? Adam hoped to be excused by saying, "The woman whom Thou gavest to
be with me, she gave me the fruit of the tree, and I did eat." The woman said,
"The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." But what was the result of
those excuses? We read: "Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the
Garden of Eden." Dr. Newman has lost the precious inheritance God had
given him. He has lost the lamp he had received to guide his steps, and he is
now in the dark dungeon of Popery, worshiping, as a poor slave, the wafer god
of Rome.
But what has become of that new church, or religion, the Via Media which had
just come out from the sickly brain of the Oxford professor? Let us hear its
sad and premature end from Dr. Newman himself. Let me, however, premise, that
when Dr. Newman began his attack against his church, he at first so skillfully
mixed the most eloquent eulogiums with his criticisms, that, though many sincere
Christians were grieved, few dared to complain. The names of Pusey and Newman
commanded such respect that few raised their voice against the conspiracy. This
emboldened them. Month after month they become unguarded in their denunciations
of the Church of England, and more explicit in their support of Romanism. In
the meantime the Church of Rome was reaping a rich harvest of perverts; for
many Protestants were unsettled in their faith, and were going the whole length
of the road to Rome so cunningly indicated by the conspirators. At last, the
90th Tract appeared in 1843. It fell as a thunderbolt on the church. A loud cry
of indignation was raised all over England against those who had so mercilessly
struck at the heart of that church which they had sworn to defend. The bishops
almost unanimously denounced Dr. Newman and his Romish tendencies, and showed
the absurdity of his Via Media.
Now, let us hear him telling himself this episode of his life. For I want to be
perfectly fair to Dr. Newman. It is only from his own words and public acts
that I want the reader to judge him.
Here is what he says of himself, after being publicly condemned: "I saw
indeed clearly that my place in the movement was lost. Public confidence was at
an end. My occupation was gone. It was simply an impossibility that I could say
anything henceforth to good effect, when I had been posted up by the Marshal on
the buttery hatch of every college of my University after the manner of
discommend pastry-cooks, and when, in every part of the country, and every
class of society, through every organ and occasion of opinion, in newspapers,
in periodicals, at meetings, in pulpits, at dinner tables, in coffee-rooms, in
railway carriages, I was denounced as a traitor who had laid his train, and was
detected in the very act of firing it against the time-honoured
establishment."....."Confidence in me was lost. But I had already
lost full confidence in myself" (p 132).
Let the reader hear these words from the very lips of Dr. Newman
"Confidence in me was lost! But I had already lost full confidence in
myself" (p. 132). Are these words the indications of a brave, innocent
man? Or are they not the cry of despair of a cowardly and guilty conscience?
Was it not when Wishart heard that the Pope and his millions of slaves had
condemned him to death, that he raised his head as a giant, and showed that he
was more above his accusers and his judges than the heavens are above the
earth? He had lost his confidence in himself and in his God and when he said, "I
am happy to suffer and die for the cause of Truth?" Did Luther lose
confidence in himself and in his God when condemned by the Pope and all his
Bishops, and ordered to go before he Emperor to be condemned to death, if he
would not retract? No! it is in those hours of trial the he made the world to
re-echo the sublime words of David: "God is our refuge and our strength, a
present help in trouble. Therefore we will not fear, though the earth be
removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea. Though
the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the
swelling thereof." But Luther had a good cause. He knew, he felt that the
God of Heaven was on his side, when Dr. Newman knew well that he was deceiving
the world, after having deceived himself. Luther was strong and fearless; for
the voice of Jesus had come through the fifteen centuries to tell him:
"Fear not, I am with thee." Dr. Newman was weak, trembling before the
storm, for his conscience was reproaching him for his treachery and his
unbelief.
Did Latimer falter and lose his confidence in himself and in his God, when
condemned by his judges and tied to the stake to be burnt? No! It is then that
he uttered those immortal and sublime words: "Master Ridley: Be of good
comfort and play the man; we shall, this day, light a candle, by God's grace,
in England, as I trust shall never be put out!"
This is the language of men who are fighting for Christ and His Gospel. Dr.
Newman could not use such noble language when he was betraying Christ and His
Gospel.
Now, let us hear from himself when, after having lost the confidence of his
Church and his country, and had also lost his own confidence in himself, he saw
a ghost and found that the Church of Rome was right. At page 157, he says:
"My friend, an anxiously religious man, pointed out the palmary words of
St. Augustine which were contained in one of the extracts made in the (Dublin)
Review, and which had escaped my observation, 'Securus judicat obis terrarum.'
He repeated these words again and again; and when he was gone, they kept
ringing in my ears....The words of St. Augustine struck me with a power which I
never had felt from any words before. To take a familiar instance, they were
like the 'Turn again, Whittington' of the chime; or to take a more serious one,
they were like the 'tolle lege' of a child which converted St. Augustine
himself. 'Securus judicat orbis terrarum!' By those great words of the ancient
father, the theory of the Via Media was absolutely pulverized. I became excited
at the view thus opened upon me....I had seen the shadow of a hand upon the
wall....He who has seen a ghost cannot be as if he had never seen it. The
heaven had opened and closed again. The thought, for the moment, had been: 'The
Church of Rome will be found right, after all'" (158).
It would be amusing, indeed, if it were not so humiliating, to see the naivete
with which Dr. Newman confesses his own aberrations, want of judgment and
honesty in reference to the pet scheme of his whole theological existence at
Oxford. "By these words," he says, "the Via Media was absolutely
pulverized!"
We all know the history of the mountain in travail, which gave birth to a
mouse. Dr. Newman tells us frankly that, after ten years of hard and painful
travail, he produced something less than a mouse. His via Media was pulverized;
it turned to be only a handful of dust.
Remember the high sounding of his trumpet about his plan of a new church, that
New Jerusalem on earth, the church of the future, which was to take the place
of his rotten Church of England. Let me repeat to you his very words about that
new ark of salvation with which the professor of Oxford was to save the world.
(Page 116): "I wanted to bring out, in a substantive form, a living Church
of England, in a position proper to herself and founded on distinct principles,
as far as paper could do it, and as earnestly preaching in an influencing
others towards it could tend to make it a fact; a living church, made of flesh
and blood, with voice, complexion, and motion, and action, and a will of its
own."
Now, what was the end of that masterpiece of theological architecture of Dr.
Newman? Here is its history, given by the great architect himself: "I read
the palmary words of St. Augustine, 'securus judical orbis terrarum!' By those
great words of the ancient father, the theory of the Via Media was pulverized!
I become excited at the view thus opened before me. I had seen the shadow of a
hand on the wall. He who has seen a ghost can never be as if he had not see it;
the heavens had opened and closed again. The thought, for a moment, was 'The
Church of Rome will be found right, after all'" (158). Have we ever seen a
man destroying himself more completely at the very moment that he tries to
defend himself? Here he does ingeniously confess what everyone knew before,
that his whole work, for the last ten years, was not only a self-deception, but
a supreme effort to deceive the world his Via Media was a perfect string of
infidelity, sophism, and folly. The whole fabric had fallen to the ground at
the sight of a ghost! To build a grand structure, in the place of his Church
which he wanted to demolish, he had thought it was sufficient to throw a great
deal of glittering sand, with some blue, white, and red dust, in the air! He
tells us that one sad hour came when he heard five Latin words from St.
Augustine, saw a ghost and his great structure fell to the ground!
What does this all mean? It simply means that God Almighty has dealt with Dr.
Newman as He did with the impious Pharaoh in the Red Sea, when he was marching
at the head of his army against the church of old, His chosen people, to
destroy them.
Dr. Newman was not only marching with Dr. Pusey at the head of an army of
theologians to destroy the Church of God, but he was employing all the
resources of his intellect, all his false and delusive science, to raise a
idolatrous church in its place; and when Pharaoh and Dr. Newman thought
themselves sure of success, the God of heaven confounded them both. The first
went down with his army to the bottom of the sea as a piece of lead. The second
lost, not his life, but something infinitely more precious he lost his
reputation for intelligence, science, and integrity; he lost the light of the
Gospel, and became perfectly blind, after having lost his place in the kingdom
of Christ!
I have never judged a man by the hearsay of any one, and I would prefer to have
my tongue cut out than to repeat a word of what the adversaries of Dr. Newman
have said against him. But we have the right, and I think it is our duty, to
hear and consider what he says of himself, and to judge him on his own
confession.
At page 174 we read these words from his own pen to a friend: "I cannot
disguise from myself that my preaching is not calculated to defend that system
of religion which has been received for three hundred years, and of which the
Heads of Houses are the legitimate maintainers in this place....I fear I must
allow that, whether I will or no, I am disposing them (the young men) towards
Rome." Here Dr. Newman declares, in plain English, that he was disposing
his hearers and students at Oxford to join the Church of Rome! I ask it: what
can we think of a man who is paid and sworn to do a thing, who not only does it
not, but who does the very contrary? Who would hesitate to call such a man
dishonest? Who would hesitate to say that such a one has no respect for those
who employ him, and no respect for himself?
Dr. Newman writes this whole book to refute the public accusation that he was a
traitor, that he was preparing the people to leave the Church of England and to
submit to the Pope. But, strange to say, it is in that very book we find the
irrefutable proof of his shameful and ignominious treachery! In a letter to Dr.
Russell, President of the Roman Catholic College of Maynooth, he wrote, page
227: "Roman Catholics will find this to be the state of things in time to
come, whatever promise they may fancy there is of a large secession to their
church. This man or that may leave us, but thee will be no general movement.
There is, indeed, an incipient movement of our church towards yours, and this
your leading men are doing all they can to frustrate by their unwearied
efforts, at all risks, to carry off individuals. When will they know their position,
and embrace a larger and wiser policy?" Is not evident here that God was
blinding Dr. Newman, and that He was making him confess his treachery in the
very moment the he was trying to conceal it? Do we not see clearly that he was
complaining of the unwise policy of the leaders of the Church of Rome who were
retarding that incipient movement of his church towards Romanism, for which he
was working day and night with Dr. Pusey?
But had not Dr. Newman confessed his own treachery, we have, today, its undeniable
proof in the letter of Dr. Pusey to the English Church Union, written in 1879.
Speaking of Dr. Newman and the other Tractarians, he says: "An acute man,
Dr. Hawkins, Provost of Oriel, said of the 'Tracts,' on their first appearance,
'I know they have a forced circulation.' We put the leaven into the meal, and
waited to see what would come of it. Our object was to Catholicism
England."
And this confession of Dr. Pusey, that he wanted to Catholicism England, is
fully confirmed by Dr. Newman (pages 108, 109) where he says: "I suspect
it was Dr. Pusey's influence and example which set me and made me set others on
the larger and more careful works in defense of the principles of the movement
which followed" (towards Rome) "in a course of years."
Nothing is more curious than to hear from Dr. Newman himself with what skill he
was trying to conceal his perfidious efforts in preparing that movement towards
Rome. He says on that subject, page 124: "I was embarrassed in consequence
of my wish to go as far as was possible in interpreting the articles in the
direction of Roman dogma, without disclosing what I was doing to the parties
whose doubts I was meeting, who might be, thereby, encouraged to go still
further than, at present, they found in themselves any call to do."
A straw fallen on the water indicates the way the tide goes. Here we have the
straw, taken by Dr. Newman himself, and thrown by him on the water. A thousand
volumes written by the ex-Professor of Oxford to deny that he was a conspirator
at work to lead his people to Rome, when in the service of the Church of
England, could not destroy the evident proof of his guilt given by himself in
this strange book.
If we want to have a proof of the supreme contempt Dr. Newman had for his
readers, and his daily habit of deceiving them by sophistries and incorrect
assertions, we have it in the remarkable lines which I find at page 123 of his
Apologia. Speaking of his "Doctrinal Development," he says: "I
wanted to ascertain what was the limit of that elasticity in the direction of
Roman dogma. But, next, I had a way of inquiry of my own which I state without
defending. I instanced it afterward in my essay on 'Doctrinal Development.'
That work, I believe, I have not read since I published it, and I doubt not at all
that I have made many mistakes in it, partly from my ignorance of the details
of doctrine as the Church of Rome holds them, but partly from my impatience to
clear as large a range for the Principles of doctrinal development (waiving the
question of historical fact) as was consistent with the strict apostolicity and
identity of the Catholic creed. In like manner, as regards the Thirty Nine
Articles, my method of inquiry was to leap in medias res" (123-124).
Dr. Newman is the author of two new systems of theology; and, from his own
confession, the two systems are a compendium of error, absurdities, and folly.
His Via Media was "pulverized" by the vision of a ghost, when he
heard the four words of St. Augustine: "Securus judicat obis terrarum."
The second, known under the name of "Doctrinal Development," is, from
his own confession, full of errors on account of his ignorance of the subject
on which he was writing, and his own impatience to support his sophisms.
Dr. Newman is really unfortunate in his paternity. He is the father of two
literary children. The first-born was called Via Media; but as it had neither
head nor feet, it was suffocated on the day of its birth by a
"ghost." The second, called "Doctrinal Development," was
not viable. The father is so shocked with the sight of the monster, that he
publicly confesses its deformities and cries out, "Mistake! mistake!
mistake!" (pages 123, 124 "Apologia pro vita sua.")
The troubled conscience of Dr. Newman has forced him to confess (page 111) that
he was miserable, from his want of faith, when a minister of the Church of
England and a Professor of Theology of Oxford: "Alas! it was my portion
for whole years to remain without any satisfactory basis for my religious
profession!" At pages 174 and 175 he tells us how miserable and anxious he
was when the voice of his conscience reproached him in the position he held in
the Church of England, while leading her people to Rome. At page 158 he
confesses his unspeakable confusion when he saw his supreme folly in building
up the Via Media, and heard its crash at the appearance of a ghost. At page 123
he acknowledges how he deceived his readers, and deceived himself, in his
"Doctrinal Development." At page 132 he tell us how he had not only
completely lost the confidence of his country, but lost confidence in himself.
And it is after this humiliating and shameful course of life that he finds out
"that the Church of Rome is right!"
Must we not thank God for having forced Dr. Newman to tell us through what dark
and tortuous ways a Protestant, a disciple of the Gospel, a minister of Christ,
a Professor of Oxford, fell into that sea of Sodom called Romanism or Papism! A
great lesson is given us here. We see the fulfillment of Christ's words about
those who have received great talents and have not used them for the "Good
Master's honour and glory."
Dr. Newman, without suspecting it, tells us that it was his course of action
towards that branch of the Church of Christ of which he was a minister, that
caused him to lose the confidence of his country, and troubled him so much that
it caused him to lose that self-confidence which is founded on our faith and
our union with Christ, who is our rock, our only strength in the hour of trial.
Having lost her sails, her anchor, and her helm, the poor ship was evidently
doomed to become a wreck. Nothing could prevent her from drifting into the
engulfing abyss of Popery.
Dr. Newman confesses that it is only when his guilty conscience was uniting its
thundering voice with that of his whole country to condemn him that he said,
"After all, the Church of Rome is right!" These are the arguments,
the motives, the lights which have led Dr. Newman to Rome! And it is from
himself that we have it! It is a just, an avenging God who forces His adversary
to glorify Him and say the truth in spite of himself in this "Apologia pro
vita sua."
No one can read that book, written almost with a superhuman skill, ability, and
fineness, without a feeling of unspeakable sadness at the sight of such bright
talents, such eloquence, such extensive studies, employed by the author to
deceive himself and deceive his readers; for it is evident, on every page, that
Dr. Newman has deceived himself before deceiving his readers. But no one can
read that book without feeling a sense of terror also. For he will hear, at
every page, the thundering voice of the God of the Gospel, "Because they
received not the love of the truth that they might be saved, God shall send
them strong delusions, that they should believe a lie" (2 Thess. ii.
10-11).
What, at first, most painfully puzzles the mind of the Christian reader of this
book is the horror which Dr. Newman has for the Holy Scriptures. The
unfortunate man who is perishing from hydrophobia does not keep himself more at
a distance from water than he does from the Word of God. It seems incredible,
but it is the fact, that from the first page of the history of his
"Religious Opinions" to page 261, where he joins the Church of Rome,
we have not a single line to tell us that he has gone to the Word of God for
light and comfort in his search after truth. We see Dr Newman at the feet of
Daniel Wilson, Scott, Milner, Whately, Hawkins, Blanco, White, William James,
Butler, Keble, Froude, Pusey, ect., asking them what to believe, what to do to
be saved; but you do not see him a single minute, no, not a single minute, at
the feet of the Saviour, asking him, "Master, what must I do to have
'Eternal Life'?" The sublime words of Peter to Christ, which are filling
all the echoes of heaven and earth, these eighteen hundred years, "Lord!
to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life!" have never
reached his ears! In the long and gloomy hours, when his soul was chilled and
trembling in the dark night of infidelity; when his uncertain feet were tired
by vainly going here and there, to find the true way, he has never heard Christ
telling him: "Come unto Me. I am the Way; I am the Door; I am the
Life!" In those terrible hours of distress of which he speaks so
eloquently, when he cries (page 111) "Alas, I was without any basis for my
religious profession, in a state of moral sickness: neither able to acquiesce
in Anglicanism, nor able to go to Rome:" when his lips were parched with
thirst after truth, he never, no never, went to the fountain from which flow
the waters of eternal life!
One day he goes to the Holy Fathers. But what will he find there? Will he see
how St. Cyprian sternly rebuked the impudence of Stephen, Bishop of Rome, who
pretended to have some jurisdiction over the See of Carthage? Will he find how
Gregory positively says that the Bishop who will pretend to be the
"Universal Bishop" is the forerunner of Antichrist? Will he hear St.
Augustine declaring that when Christ said to Peter, "Thou art Peter, and
upon this rock I will build my Church," He was speaking of Himself as the
rock upon which the Church would stand? No. The only thing which Dr. Newman
brings us from the Holy Fathers is so ridiculous and so unbecoming that I am
ashamed to have to repeat it. He tells us (page 78), "I have an idea. The
mass of the Fathers (Justin, Athenagoras, Ireanaeus, Clement, Tertullian,
Origen, Ambrose) hold that, though Satan fell from the beginning, the angels
fell before the deluge, falling in love with the daughters of men. This has
lately come across me as a remarkable solution of a notion I cannot help
holding."
Allow me here to remind the reader that, though the Fathers have written many
beautiful evangelical pages, some of them have written the greatest nonsense
and the most absurd things which human folly can imagine. Many of them were
born and educated as pagans. They had learned and believed the history and
immorality of their demi-gods; they had brought those notions with them into
the Church; and they had attributed to the angels of God, the passions and love
for women which was one of the most conspicuous characters of Jupiter, Mars,
Cupid, Bacchus, ect. And Dr. Newman, whose want of accuracy and judgment is so
often revealed and confessed by him in this book, has not been able to see that
those sayings of the Fathers were nothing but human aberrations. He has
accepted that as Gospel truth, and he has been silly enough to boast of it.
The bees go to the flowers to make their precious honey; they wisely choose
what is more perfect, pure and wholesome in the flowers to feed themselves. Dr.
Newman does the very contrary; he goes to those flowers of past ages, the Holy
Fathers, and takes from them what is impure for his food. After this, is it a
wonder that he has so easily put his lips to the cup of the great enchantress
who is poisoning the world with the wine of her prostitution?
When he reader has followed with attention the history of the religious
opinions of Dr. Newman in his "Apologia pro vita sua," and he sees
him approaching, day after day, the bottomless abyss of folly, corruption,
slavery, and idolatry of Rome, into which he suddenly falls (page 261), he is
forcibly reminded of the strange spectacle recorded in the eloquent pages of
Chateaubriand, about the Niagara Falls.
More than once, travelers standing at the foot of that marvel of the marvels of
the works of God, looking up towards heaven, have been struck by the sight of a
small, dark spot moving in large circles, at a great distance above the fall.
Gazing at that strange object, they soon remarked, that in its circular march
in the sky, the small dark spot was rapidly growing larger, as it was coming
down towards the thundering fall. They soon discovered the majestic form of one
of the giant eagles of America! And the eagle, balancing himself in the air,
seemed to looked down on the marvelous fall as if absolutely taken with
admiration at its grandeur and magnificence! For some time, the giant of the
air remained above the majestic cataract describing his large circles. But when
coming down nearer and nearer the terrific abyss, he was suddenly dragged as by
an irresistible power into the bottomless abyss to disappear. Some time later
the body, bruised and lifeless, is seen floating on the rapid and dark waters,
to be for ever lost in the bitter waters of the sea, at a long distance below.
Rome is a fall. It is the name which God Himself has given her: "There
come a falling away" (2 Thess. ii. 3). As the giant eagle of America, when
imprudently coming too near the mighty Fall of Niagara, is often caught in the
irresistible vortex which attracts it from a long distance, so that eagle of
Oxford, Dr. Newman, whom God has created for better things, his imprudently
come too near the terrific papal fall. He has been enchanted by its beauty, its
thousand bright rainbows: he has taken for real suns the fantastic jets of
light which encircle its misty head, and conceal its dark and bottomless abyss.
Bewildered by the bewitching voice of the enchantress, he has been unable to
save himself from her perfidious and almost irresistible attractions. The eagle
of Oxford has been caught in the whirlpool of the engulfing powers of Rome, and
you see him today, bruised, lifeless, dragged on the dark waters of Popery
towards the shore of a still darker eternity.
Dr. Newman could not make his submission to Rome without perjuring himself. He
swore that he would never interpret the Holy Scriptures except according to the
unanimous consent of the Holy Fathers. Well, I challenge him here, to meet me
and show me that the Holy Fathers are unanimous on the supremacy of the power
of the Pope over the other bishops; that he is infallible; that the priest has
the power to make his God with a wafer; that the Virgin Mary is the only hope
of sinners. I challenge him to show us that auricular confession is an
ordinance of Christ. Dr. Newman knows well that those things are impostures. He
has never believed, he never will believe them. The fact is that Dr. Newman
confesses that he never had any faith when he was a minister of the Church of
England; and it is clear that he is the same since he became a Roman Catholic.
In page 282 we read this strange exposition of his faith: "We are called
upon not to profess anything, but to submit and be silent," which is just
the faith of the mute animal which obeys the motion of the bridle, without any
resistance or thought of its own. This is I cannot deny it the true, the only
faith in the Church of Rome; it is the faith which leads directly to Atheism or
idiotism. But Christ gave us a very different idea of the faith He asks from
His disciples when He said: "The hour cometh, and now is, when the true
worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth" (John iv. 23).
That degrading and brutal religion of Dr. Newman surely was not the religion of
Paul, when he wrote, "I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say" (1
Cor. x. 15). Dr. Newman honestly tells us (page 228), when speaking of the
worship of the Virgin Mary: "Such devotional manifestations in honour of our
Lady had been my great Crux as regards Catholicism. I say frankly I do not
fully enter into them now...they are suitable for Italy, but are not suitable
for England." He has only changed his appearance his heart is what it was
formerly, when a minister of the Church of England. He wanted then another
creed, another Church for England. So now, he finds that this and that practice
of Rome may do for the Italians, but not for the English people!
Was he pleased with the promulgation of Papal infallibility? No. It is a public
fact that one of his most solemn actions, a few years since his connection with
the Church of Rome, was to protest against the promulgation of that dogma. More
than that, he expressed his doubts about the wisdom and the right of the
Council to proclaim it.
Let us read his interesting letter to Bishop Ullathorne "Rome ought to be
a name to lighten the heart at all times; and a council's proper office is,
when some great heresy or other evil impends, to inspire hope and confidence in
the faithful. But now we have the greatest meeting which ever has been, and
that at Rome, infusing into us by the accredited organs of Rome and of its
partisans (such as the Civilta, the Armonia, the Univers, and the Tablet)
little else than fear and dismay! When we are all at rest and have no doubts,
and at least practically, not to say doctrinally hold the Holy Father to be
infallible, suddenly there is thunder in the clear sky, and we are told to
prepare for something, we know not what, to try our faith, we know not how no impending
danger is to be averted, but a great difficulty is to be created. Is this the
proper work of an Ecumenical Council? As to myself personally, please God, I do
not expect any trial at all: but I cannot help suffering with the many souls
who are suffering, and I look with anxiety at the prospect of having to defend
decisions which may not be difficult to my own private judgment, but may be
most difficult to maintain logically in the face of historical facts.
"What have we done to be treated as the faithful never were treated
before? When has a definition de fide been a luxury of devotion, and not a
stern, painful necessity? Why should an aggressive, insolent faction be allowed
to 'make the heart of the just sad, whom the Lord hath not made sorrowful?' why
cannot we be let alone, when we have pursued peace, and thought no evil!
"I assure you, my Lord, some of the truest minds are driven one way and
another, and do not know where to rest their feet one day determining 'to give
up all theology as a bed job,' and recklessly to believe henceforth almost that
the Pope is impeccable: at another, tempted to 'believe all the worst which a
book like Janus says:' others doubting about 'the capacity possessed by bishops
drawn from corners of the earth, to judge what is fitting for European
society'; and then, again, angry with the Holy See for listening to 'the
flattery of a clique of Jesuits, redemptorists, and converts.' "Then,
again, think of the store of Pontifical scandals in the history of eighteen
centuries, which have partly been poured forth and partly are still to come.
What Murphy inflicted upon us in one way, M. Veuillot is indirectly bringing on
us in another. And then, again, the blight which is falling upon the multitude
of Anglican Ritualists, ect., who, themselves, perhaps at least, their leaders
may never become Catholics, but who are leavening the various English
denominations and parties (far beyond their own range), with principles and
sentiments tending towards their ultimate absorption into the Catholic Church.
"With these thoughts ever before me, I am continually asking myself
whether I ought not to make my feelings public: but all I do is to pray those
early doctors of the Church whose intercession would decide the matter
(Augustine, Ambrose, and Jerome, Athanasius, Chrysostom, and Basil) to avert
this great calamity.
"If it is God's will that the Pope's infallibility be defined, then is it
God's will to throw back 'the times and movements' of that triumph which He has
destined for His kingdom, and I shall feel I have but to bow my head to His
adorable, inscrutable providence.
"You have not touched upon the subject yourself, but I think you will
allow me to express to you feelings, which, for the most part, I keep to
myself."
These eloquent complaints of the new convert exceedingly irritated Pius IX. and
the Jesuits at Rome: they entirely destroyed their confidence in him. They were
too shrewd to ignore that he had never been anything else but a kind of
free-thinker, whose Christian faith was without any basis, as he has himself
confessed. They had received him, of course, with pleasure, for he was the very
best man in England to unsettle the minds of the young ministers of the Church,
but they had left him alone in his oratory of Birmingham, where they seemed to
ignore him.
However, when the protest of the new so-called convert showed that his
submission was but a sham, and that he was more Protestant than ever, they
lashed him without mercy. But before we hear the stern answers of the Roman Catholics
to their new recruit, let us remember the fact the when that letter appeared,
Dr. Newman has lost the memory of it; he boldly denied its paternity at first;
it was only when the proofs were publicly given the he had written it, that he
acknowledged it, saying for his excuse that he had forgotten his writing it!!
Now let us hear the answer to the Civilta, the organ of the Pope, to Dr.
Newman: "Do you not see that it is only temptation that makes you see
everything black? If the holy doctors whom you invoke, Ambrose, Jerome, ect.,
do not decide the controversy in your way, it is not, as the Protestant Pall
Mall Gazette fancies, because they will not or cannot interpose, but because
they agree with St. Peter and with the petition of the majority. Would you have
us make procession in sackcloth and ashes to avert this scourge of the
definition of a verity?" (Ibid., p. 271).
The clergy of France, through their organ L'Univers (Vol. II., pp. 31 34), were
still more severe and sarcastic. They had just collected $4,000 to help Dr.
Newman to pay the enormous expenses of the suit for his slanders against Father
Achilli, which he had lost.
Dr. Newman, as it appears by the article from the pen of the celebrated editor
of the Univers, had not even had the courtesy to acknowledge the gift, not the
exertions of those who had collected that large sum of money. Now let us see
what they thought and said in France about the ex-professor of Oxford whom they
called the "Respectable convict." Speaking of the $4,000 sent from
France, Veuillot says: "The respectable convict received it, and was
pleased; but he gave no thanks and showed no courtesy. Father Newman ought to
be more careful in what he says: everything that is comely demands it of him.
But, at any rate, if his Liberal passion carries him away, till he forgets what
he owes to us and to himself, what answer must one give him, but that he had
better go on as he set out, silently ungrateful." (L'Univers, Vol. II. pp.
32 34; Ibid., p. 272).
These public rebukes, addressed from Paris and Rome by the two most popular
organs of the Church of Rome, tell us the old story; the services of traitors
may be accepted, but they are never trusted. Father Newman had not the
confidence of the Roman Catholics.
But some will say: "Has not the dignity of Cardinal, to which he has
lately been raised, proved that the present Pope has the greatest confidence in
Dr. Newman?"
Had I not been twenty-five years a priest of Rome, I would say "Yes!"
But I know too much of their tactics for that. The dignity of Cardinal has been
given to Drs. Manning and Newman as the baits which the fishermen of Prince
Edward Island throw into the sea to attract the mackerels. The Pope, with those
long scarlet robes thrown over the shoulders of the two renegades from the
Church of England, hopes to catch more English mackerel.
Besides that, we all know the remarkable words of St. Paul: "And those
members of the body which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow
more abundant honour, and our uncomely parts have more abundant
comeliness" (1 Cor. xii. 23).
It is on that principle that the Pope has acted. He knew well that Dr. Newman
had played the act of a traitor at Oxford, that he had been caught in the very
act of conspiracy by his Bishops, that he had entirely lost the confidence of
the English people. These public facts paralyzed the usefulness of the new
convert. He was really a member of the Church of Rome, but he was one of the
most uncomely ones; so much so that the last Pope, Pius IX., had left him
alone, in a dark corner, for nearly eighteen years. Leo XIII. was more shrewd.
He felt that Newman might become one of the most powerful agents of Romanism in
England, if he were only covering his uncomeliness with the rich red Cardinal
robe.
But will the scarlet colours which now clothe Dr. Newman make us forget that,
today, he belongs to the most absurd, immoral, abject, and degrading form of
idolatry the world has ever seen? Will we forget that Romanism, these last six
centuries, is nothing else but old paganism in its most degrading forms, coming
back under a Christian name? What is the divinity which is adored in those
splendid temples of modern Rome? Is it anything else but the old Jupiter
Tonans! Yes, the Pope has stolen the old gods of paganism, and he has
sacrilegiously written the adorable name of Jesus in their faces, that the
deluded modern nations may have less objection to accept the worship of their
pagan ancestors. They adore a Christ in the Church of Rome: they sing beautiful
hymns to His honour: they build Him magnificent temples; they are exceedingly
devoted to Him they make daily enormous sacrifices to extend His power and
glory all over the world. But what is that Christ? It is simply an idol of
bread, baked every day by the servant-girl of the priest, or the neighbouring
nuns.
I have been twenty-five years one of the most sincere and zealous priests of
that Christ. I have made Him with mine own hands, and the help of my servants,
for a quarter of a century; I have a right to say that I know Him perfectly
well. It is that I may tell what I know of that Christ that the God of the
Gospel has taken me by the hand, and granted me to give my testimony before the
world. Hundreds of times I have said to my servant-girl what Dr. Newman and all
the priests of Rome say, every day, to their own servants or their nuns:
"Please make me some wafers, that I may say mass and give the communion to
those who want to receive it." And the dutiful girl took some wheat flour,
mixed it with water, and put the dough between those tow well-polished and
engraven irons, which she had well heated before. In less time than I can write
it, the dough was baked into wafers. Handing them to me, I brought them to the
altar, and performed a ceremony which is called "the mass." In the
very midst of that mass, I pronounced on that wafer five magic words, "Hoc
est enim corpus meum," and had to believe, what Dr. Newman and all the
priests of Rome profess to believe, that there were no more wafers, no more bread
before me, but that what were wafers, had been turned into the great Eternal
God who had created the world. I had to prostrate myself, and ask my people to
prostrate themselves before the god I had just made with five words from my
lips; and the people, on their knees, bowing their heads, and bringing their
faces to the dust, adored god whom I had just made, with the help of these
heated irons and my servant-girl.
Now, is this not a form of idolatry more degrading, more insulting to the
infinite majesty of God than the worship of the gold calf? Where is the
difference between the idolatry of Aaron and the Israelites adoring the gold
calf in the wilderness and the idolatry of Dr. Newman adoring the wafer in his
temple? The only difference is, that Aaron worshipped a god infinitely more
respectable and powerful, in melted gold, than Dr. Newman worshiping his baked
dough.
The idolatry of Dr. Newman is more degrading than the idolatry of the
worshipers of the sun.
When the Persians adore the sun, they give their homage to the greatest, the
most glorious being which is before us. That magnificent fiery orb, millions of
miles in circumference, which rises as a giant, every morning, from behind the
horizon, to march over the world and pour everywhere its floods of heat, light
an life, cannot be contemplated without feelings of respect, admiration, and
awe. Man must raise his eyes up to see that glorious sun he must take the
eagle's wings to follow his giant strides throughout the myriads of worlds
which are there, to speak to us of the wisdom, the power, and love of our God.
It is easy to understand that poor, fallen, blind men may take that great being
for their god. Would not every one perish and die, if the sun would forget to
come every day, that we may bathe and swim in his ocean of light and life?
Then, when I see the Persian priests of the sun, in their magnificent temple,
with censors in their hands, waiting for the appearance of its first rays, to
intone their melodious hymns and sing their sublime canticles, I know their
error and I understand it; I was about to say, I almost excuse it. I feel an
immense compassion for these deluded idolaters. However, I feel they are raised
above the dust of the earth: their intelligence, their souls cannot but receive
some sparks of life and life from the contemplation of that inexhaustible focus
of light an life. But is not Dr. Newman wit his Roman Catholic people a
thousand times more worthy of our compassion and our tears, when they are
abjectly prostrated before his ignoble wafer to adore it as their Saviour,
their Creator, their God? Is it possible to imagine a spectacle more
humiliating, blasphemous, and sacrilegious, than a multitude of men and women
prostrating their faces to the dust to adore a god whom the rats and mice have,
thousands of times, dragged and eaten in their dark holes? Where are the rays
of light and life coming from that wafer? Instead of being enlarged and
elevated at the approach of this ridiculous modern divinity, is not the human
intelligence contracted, diminished, paralyzed, chilled, and struck with idiocy
and death at its feet?
Can we be surprised that the Roman Catholic nations are so fast falling into
the abyss of infidelity and atheism, when they hear their priests telling them
that more than 200,000 times, every day, this contemptible wafer is changed by
them into the great God who has created heaven and earth at the beginning, and
who has saved this perishing world by sacrificing the body and the blood which
He has taken as His tabernacle to show us His eternal love!
Come with me and see those multitudes of people with their faces prostrated in
the dust, adoring their white elephant of Siam.
Oh! what ignorance and superstition! what blindness and folly! you will
exclaim. To adore a white elephant as God!
But there is a spectacle more humiliating and more deplorable: there is a
superstition, an idolatry below that of the Siamese. It is the idolatry
practiced by Dr. Newman and his millions of co-religionists today. Yes! the
elephant god of the Asiatic people is infinitely more respectable than the
wafer god of Dr. Newman. That elephant may be taken as the symbol of strength,
magnanimity,patience, ect. There is life, motion in that noble animal he sees
with his eyes, he walks with his feet. Let some one attack him, he will protect
himself with his mighty trunk he will throw his enemy high in the air he will
crush him under his feet.
But look at this modern divinity of Rome. It has eyes, but does not see; feet,
but does not move; a mouth, but does not speak. There is neither life nor
strength in the wafer god of Rome.
But if the fall of Dr. Newman into the bottomless abyss of the idolatry of Rome
is a deplorable fact, there is another fact still more deplorable.
How many fervent Christians, how many venerable ministers of Christ everywhere,
are, just now, prostrated at the dear Saviour's feet, telling Him with tears:
"Didst Thou not sow the good Gospel seed all over our dear country,
through the hands of our heroic and martyred fathers? From whence, then, hath
it these Popish and idolatrous tares?" And the "Good Master"
answers, today, what He answered eighteen hundred years ago: "While men
slept, the enemy came during the night; he has sowed those tares among the
wheat, and he went away" (Matthew xii. 25).
And if you want to know the name of the enemy who has sowed tares, in the
night, amongst the wheat, and went away, you have only to read this
"Apologia pro vita sua." You will find this confession of Dr. Newman
at page 174: -
"I cannot disguise from myself that my preaching is not calculated to
defend that system of religion which has been received for three hundred years,
and of which the Heads of Houses are the legitimate maintainers in this
place....I must allow that I was disposing 'the minds of young men' towards
Rome!"
Now, having obtained from the very enemy's lips how he has sowed tares during
the night (secretly), read page 262, and you will see how he went away and
prostrated himself at the feet of the most implacable enemy of all the rights and
liberties of men, to call him "Most Holy Father." Read how he fell at
the knees of the very power which prepared and blessed the Armada destined to
cover his native land, England, with desolation, ruins, tears and blood, and
enchain those of her people who would not have been slaughtered on the
battle-field! See how the enemy, after having sown the tares, wet away to the
feet of a Sergius III., the public lover of Marozia and to the feet of his
bastard, John XI., who was still more debauched than his father and to the feet
of Leo VI., killed by an outraged citizen of Rome, in the act of such an
infamous crime that I cannot name it here to the feet of an Alexander, who
seduced his own daughter, and surpassed in cruelty and debauchery Nero and
Caligula. Let us see Dr. Newman falling at the feet of all these monsters of
depravity, to call them, "Most Holy Fathers," "Most Holy Heads
of the Church," "Most Holy and Infallible Vicars of Jesus
Christ!"
At the sight of such a fall, what can we do, but say with Isaiah:
"The Lord has broken the staff of the wicked, and the sceptre of the
ruler....How art thou fallen, O Lucifer, Son of the morning! how are thou cut
down to the ground?" (Is. xiv.)
.
CHAPTER 42
On
the first Sabbath of November, 1846, after a retreat of eight days, I fell on
my knees, and asked as a favour, to be received as a novice of the religious
order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate of Longueuil, whose object is to preach
retreats (revivals) among the people. No child of the Church of Rome ever enrolled
himself with more earnestness and sincerity under the mysterious banners of her
monastic armies than I did, that day. It is impossible to entertain more
exalted views of the beauty and holiness of the monastic life, than I had. To
live among the holy men who had made the solemn vows of poverty, obedience, and
chastity, seemed to me the greatest and the most blessed privilege which my God
could grant on earth.
Within the walls of the peaceful monastery of Longueuil, among those holy men
who had, long since, put an impassable barrier between themselves and that
corrupted world, from the snares of which I was just escaping, my conviction
was that I should see nothing but actions of the most exalted piety; and that
the deadly weapons of the enemy could not pierce those walls protected by the
Immaculate Mother of God!
The frightful storms which had covered with wrecks the roaring sea, where I had
so often nearly perished, could not trouble the calm waters of the port where
my bark had just entered. Every one of the members of the community was to be
like an angel of charity, humility, modesty, whose example was to guide my
steps in the ways of God. My superior appeared to be less a superior than a
father, whose protecting care, by day and night, would be a shield over me.
Noah, in the ark, safe from the raging waves which were destroying the world,
did not feel more grateful to God than I was, when once in this holy solitude.
The vow of perfect poverty was to save me for ever from the cares of the world.
Having, hereafter, no right to possess a cent, the world would become to me a
paradise, where food, clothing, and lodging would come without anxiety or care.
My father superior would supply all these things, without any other condition
on my part, than to love and obey a man of God whose whole life was to be spent
in guiding my steps in the ways of the most exalted evangelical virtues. Had
not that father himself made a solemn vow to renounce not only all the honours
and dignities of the church, that his whole mind and heart might be devoted to
my holiness on earth, and my salvation in heaven?
How easy to secure that salvation now! I had only to look to that father on
earth, and obey him as my Father in Heaven. Yes! The will of that father was to
be, for me, the will of my God. Though I might err in obeying him, my errors
would not be laid to my charge. To save my soul, I should have only to be like
a corpse, or a stick in the hands of my father superior. Without any anxiety or
any responsibility whatever on my own, I was to be led to heaven as the
new-born child in the arms of his loving mother, without any fear, thoughts, or
anxiety of his own.
With the Christian poet I could have sung:
"Rocks and storms I fear no more,
When on that eternal shore,
Drop the anchor! Furl the sail!
I am safe within the vail."
But
how short were to be these fine dream of my poor deluded mind! When on my
knees, Father Guigues handed me, with great solemnity, the Latin books of the
rules of that monastic order, which is their real gospel, warning me that it
was a secret book, that there were things in it I ought not to reveal to
anyone; and he made me solemnly promise that I would never show it to any one
outside the order.
When alone, the next morning, in my cell, I thanked God and the Virgin Mary for
the favours of the last day, and the thought came involuntarily to my mind:
"Have you not, a thousand times, heard and said that the Holy Church of
Rome absolutely condemns and anathematizes secret societies. And do you not belong,
today, to a secret society? How can you reconcile the solemn promise of secrecy
you made last night, with the anathemas hurled by all your popes against secret
societies?" After having, in vain, tried, in my mind, to reconcile these
two things, I happily remembered that I was a corpse, that I had for ever given
up my private judgment that my only business now was to obey. "Does a
corpse argue against those who turn it from side to side? Is it not in perfect
peace, whatever may be the usage to which it is exposed, or to whatever place
it is dragged. Shall I lose the rich crown which is before me, at my first step
in the ways of perfection?"
I bade my rebellious intelligence to be still, my private judgment to be mute,
and, to distract my mind from this first temptation, I read that book of rules
with the utmost attention. I had not gone through it all before I understood
why it was kept from the eyes of the curates and the other secular priests. To
my unspeakable amazement, I found that, from the beginning to the end, it
speaks with the most profound contempt for them all. I said to myself:
"What would be the indignation of the curates, if they should suspect that
these strangers from France have such a bad opinion of them all! Would the good
curates receive them as angels from heaven, and raise them so high in the
esteem of the people, if they knew that the first thing an Oblate has to learn,
is that the secular priest is, today, steeped in immorality, ignorance,
wordiness, laziness, gluttony, ect.; that he is the disgrace of the church,
which would speedily be destroyed, was she not providentially sustained, and
kept in the ways of God, by the holy monastic men whom she nurses as her only
hope! Clear as the light of the sun on a bright day, the whole fabric of the
order of the Oblates presented itself to my mind, as the most perfect system of
Pharisaism the world had ever seen."
The Oblate, who studies his book of rules, his only gospel, must have his mind
filled with the idea of his superior holiness, not only over the poor sinful,
secular priest, but over every one else. The Oblate alone is Christian, holy,
and sacred; the rest of the world is lost! The Oblate alone is the salt of the
earth, the light of the world! I said to myself: "Is it to attain to this pharisaical
perfection that I have left my beautiful and dear parish of Kamouraska, and
given up the honourable position which my God had given me in my country!"
However, after some time spent in these sad and despondent reflections, I again
felt angry with myself. I quickly directed my mind to the frightful,
unsuspected, and numberless scandals I had known in almost every parish I had
visited. I remembered the drunkenness of the curate, the impurities of this,
the ignorance of another, the worldliness and absolute want of faith of others,
and concluded that, after all, the Oblates were not far from the truth in their
bad opinion of the secular clergy. I ended my sad afflictions by saying to
myself: "After all, if the Oblates live a life of holiness, as I expect to
find here, is it a crime that they should see, feel, and express among
themselves, the difference which exists between a regular and a secular clergy?
Am I come here to judge and condemn these holy men? No! I came here to save
myself by the practice of the most heroic Christian virtues, the first of
which, is that I should absolutely and for ever, give up my private judgment
consider myself as a corpse in the hand of my superior."
With all the fervour of my soul, I prayed to God and to the Virgin Mary, day
and night, that week, that I might attain that supreme state of perfection,
when I would have no will, no judgment of my own. The days of that first week
passed very quickly, spent in prayer, reading and meditation of the Scriptures,
study of ecclesiastical history and ascetical books, from half-past five in the
morning till half-past nine at night. The meals were taken at the regular hours
of seven, twelve, and six o'clock, during which, with rare exceptions, silence
was kept, and pious books were read. The quality of the food was good; but, at
first, before they got a female cook to preside over the kitchen,everything was
so unclean, that I had to shut my eyes at meals, not to see what I was eating.
I should have complained, had not my lips been sealed by that strange monastic
view of perfection that every religious man is a corpse! What does a corpse
care about the cleanliness or uncleanliness of what is put into its mouth? The
third day, having drank at breakfast a glass of milk which was literally mixed
with the dung of a cow, my stomach rebelled; a circumstance which I regretted
exceedingly, attributing it to my want of monastic perfection. I envied the
high state of holiness of the other fathers who had so perfectly attained to
the sublime perfection of submission that they could drink that impure milk
just as if it had been clean.
Everything went on well the first week, with the exception of a dreadful scare
I had at the dinner of the first Friday. Just after eating soup, when listening
with the greatest attention to the reading of the life of a saint, I suddenly
felt as if the devil had taken hold of my feet; I threw down my knife and fork,
and I cried at the top of my voice, "My God! my God! what is there?"
and as quick as lightning I jumped on my chair to save myself from Satan's
grasp. My cries were soon followed by an inexpressible burst of convulsive
laughter from everyone.
"But what does that mean? Who has taken hold of my feet?" I asked.
Father Guigues tried to explain the matter to me, but it took him a
considerable time. When he began to speak, an irrepressible burst of laughter
prevented his saying a word. The fits of laughter became still more
uncontrollable, on account of the seriousness with which I was repeatedly
asking them who could have taken hold of my feet! At last some one said,
"It is Father Lagier who wanted to kiss your feet!" At the same time,
Lagier walking on his hands and knees, his face covered with sweat, dust, and
dirt, was crawling out from under the table; literally rolling on the floor, in
such an uncontrollable fit of laughter that he was unable to stand on his feet.
Of course, when I understood that no devil had tried to drag me by the feet,
but that it was simply one of the father Oblates, who, to go through one of the
common practices of humility in that monastery, had crawled under the table, to
take hold of the feet of every one and kiss them, I joined with the rest of the
community, and laughed to my heart's content.
Not many days after this, we were going, after tea, from the dining-room to the
chapel, to pass five or ten minutes in adoration of the wafer god; we had two
doors to cross, and it was pretty dark. Being the last who had entered the
monastery, I had to walk first, the other monks following me. We were reciting,
with a loud voice, the Latin Psalm: "Miserere mei Deus." We were all
marching pretty fast, when, suddenly, my feet met a large, though unseen
object, and down I fell, and rolled on the floor; my next companion did the
same, and rolled over me, and so did five or six others, who, in the dark, had
also struck their feet on that object. In a moment, we were five or six
"Holy Fathers" rolling on each other on the floor, unable to rise up,
splitting our sides with convulsive laughter. Father Brunette, in one of his
fits of humility, had left the table a little before the rest, with the
permission of the Superior, to lay himself flat on the floor, across the door.
Not suspecting it, and unable to see anything, from the want of sufficient
light, I had entangled my feet on that living corpse, as also the rest of those
who were walking too close behind me, to stop before tumbling over one another.
No words can describe my feelings of shame when I saw, almost every day, some
performance of this kind going on, under the name of Christian humility. In
vain I tried to silence the voice of my intelligence, which was crying to me,
day and night, that this was a mere diabolical caricature of the humility of
Christ. Striving to silence my untamed reason, by telling it that it had no
right to speak, and argue, and criticize, within the holy walls of a monastery,
it, nevertheless, spoke louder, day after day, telling me that such acts of
humility were a mockery. In vain, I said to myself, "Chiniquy, thou art not
come here to philosophize on this and that, but to sanctify thyself by becoming
like a corpse, which has no preconceived ideas, no acquired store of knowledge,
no rule of common sense to guide it! Poor, wretched, sinful Chiniquy, thou art
here to save thyself by admiring every iota of the holy rules of your
superiors, and to obey every word of their lips!"
I felt angry against myself, and unspeakably sad when, after whole weeks and
months of efforts, not only to silence the voice of my reason, but to kill it,
it had more life than ever, and was more and more loudly protesting against the
unmanly, unchristian, and ridiculous daily usages and rules of the monastery. I
envied the humble piety of the other good Fathers, who were apparently so
happy, having conquered themselves so completely, as to destroy that haughty
reason, which was constantly rebelling in me.
Twice, every week, I went to reveal to my guide and confessor, Father Allard,
the master of novices, my interior struggles; my constant, though vain efforts,
to subdue my rebellious reason. He always gladdened me with the promise that,
sooner or later, I should have that interior perfect peace which is promised to
the humble monk when he has attained the supreme monastic perfection of
considering himself as a corpse, as regards the rules and will of his
superiors. My sincere and constant efforts to reconcile myself to the rules of
the monastery were, however, soon to receive a new and rude check. I had read
in the book of rules, that a true monk must closely watch those who live with
him, and secretly report to his superior the defects and sins which he detects
in them. The first time I read that strange rule, my mind was so taken up by
other things, that I did not pay much attention to it. But the second time I
studied that clause, the blush came to my face, and in spite of myself, I said:
"Is it possible that we are a band of spies?" I was not long in
seeing the disastrous effects of this most degrading and immoral rule. One of
the fathers, for whom I had a particular affection for his many good qualities,
and who had many times given me the sincere proof of his friendship, said to me
one day: "For God's sake, my dear Father Chiniquy, tell me if it is you
who denounced me to the Superior for having said that the conduct of Father
Guigues towards me was uncharitable?"
"No! my dear friend," I answered, "I never said such a thing
against you, for two reasons: The first is, that you have never said a word in
my presence which could give me the idea that you had such an opinion of our
good Father Superior; the second reason is, that though you might have told me
anything of that kind, I would prefer to have my tongue cut, and eaten by dogs,
than to be a spy, and denounce you!"
"I am glad t know that," he rejoined, "for I was told by some of
the fathers that you were the one who had reported me to the Superior as
guilty, though I am innocent of that offense, but I could not believe it."
He added with tears, "I regret having left my parish to be an Oblate, on account
of that abominable law which we are sworn to fulfill. That law makes a real
hell of this monastery, and, I suppose, of all the monastic orders, for I think
it is a general law with all the religious houses. When you have passed more
time here, you will see that that law of detection puts an insurmountable wall
between us all; it destroys every spring of Christian and social
happiness."
"I understand, perfectly well, what you say," I answered him;
"the last time I was alone with Father Superior, he asked me why I had
said that the present Pope was an old fool; he persisted in telling me that I
must have said it, 'for,' he added, 'one of our most reliable fathers has
assured me you said it.' 'Well, my dear Father Superior,' I answered him, 'that
reliable father has told you a big lie; I never said such a thing, for the good
reason that I sincerely think that our present Pope is one of the wisest that
ever ruled the church.' I added, 'Now I understand why there is so much
unpleasantness in our mutual intercourse, during the hours we are allowed to
talk. I see that nobody dares to speak his mind on any grave subject. The
conversations are colourless and without life.'" "That is just the
reason," answered my friend. When some of the fathers, like you and me,
would prefer to be hung rather than become spies, the great majority of them,
particularly among the French priests recently imported from France, will not
hear ten words from your lips on any subject, without finding an opportunity of
reporting eight of them as unbecoming and unchristian, to the superiors. I do
not say that it is always through malice that they give such false reports; it
is more through want of judgment. They are very narrow minded; they do not
understand the half of what they hear in its true sense; and they give their
false impressions to the superiors, who, unfortunately, encourage that system
of spying, as the best way of transforming every one of us into corpses. As we
are never confronted with our false accusers, we can never know them, and we
lose confidence in each other; thus it is that the sweetest and holiest springs
of true Christian love are for ever dried up. It is on this spying system which
is the curse and the hell of our monastic houses, that a celebrated French
writer, who had been a monk himself, wrote of all the monks:
"Ils rentrent dans leurs monasteres sans so connaaitre; ils y vivent, sans
s'aimr: et ils se separent sans se regretter" (Monks enter a monastery
without knowing each other; they live there, without loving each other; and
they depart from each other without any regret.)
However, though I sincerely deplored that there was such a law of espionage
among us, I tried to persuade myself that it was like the dark spots of the
sun, which do not diminish its beauty, its grandeur and its innumerable
blessings. The Society of the Oblates was still to me the blessed ark where I
should find a sure shelter against the storms which were desolating the rest of
the world.
Not long after my reception as a novice, the providence of God put before our
eyes one of those terrible wrecks which would make the strongest of us tremble.
Suddenly, at the hour of breakfast, the superior of the Seminary of St.
Sulpice, and grand vicar of the Diocese of Montreal, the Rev. Mr. Quiblier,
knocked at our door, to rest an hour, and breakfast with us, when on his way to
France.
This unfortunate priest, who was among the best orators and the best looking
men Montreal had ever seen, had lived such a profligate life with his penitent
nuns and ladies of Montreal, that a cry of indignation from the whole people
had forced Bishop Bourget to send him back to France. Our father superior took
the opportunity of the fall of that talented priest, to make us bless God for
having gathered us behind the walls of our monastery, where the efforts of the
enemy were powerless. But, alas! we were soon to know, at our own expense, that
the heart of man is weak and deceitful everywhere.
It was not long after the public fall of the grand vicar of Montreal, when a
fine-looking widow was engaged to preside over our kitchen. She was more than
forty years old, and had very good manners. Unfortunately, she had not been
four months in the monastery, when she fell in love with her father confessor,
one of the most pious of the French father Oblates. The modern Adam was not
stronger than the old one against the charms of the new Eve. Both were found,
in an evil hour, forgetting one of the holy laws of God. The guilty priest was
punished and the weak woman dismissed. But an unspeakable shame remained upon
us all! I would have preferred to have my sentence of death, than the news of
such a fall inside the walls of that house where I had so foolishly believed
that Satan could not lay his snares. From that day, it was the will of God that
the strange and beautiful illusions which had brought me to that monastery,
should fade away one after the other, like the white mist which conceals the
bright rays of the morning sun. The Oblates began to appear to me pretty much
like other men. Till then, I had looked at them with my eyes shut, and I had
seen nothing but the glittering colours with which my imagination was painting
them. From that day, I studied them with my eyes opened, and I saw them just as
they were.
In the spring of 1847, having a severe indisposition, the doctor ordered me to
go to the Hotel Dieu of Montreal, which was, then, near the splendid St. Mary's
Church. I made there, for the first time, the acquaintance of a venerable old
nun, who was very talkative. She was one of the superiors of the house; her
family name was Urtubise. Her mind was still full of indignation at the bad
conduct of two father Oblates, who, under the pretext of sickness, had lately
come to her monastery to seduce the young nuns who were serving them. She told
me how she had turned them out ignominiously, forbidding them ever to come
again, under any pretext, into the hospital. She was young, when Bishop
Lartigue, being driven away from the Sulpician Seminary of Montreal, in 1823,
had taken refuge, with his secretary, the Rev. Ignace Bourget, into the modest
walls of that nunnery. She told me how the nuns had soon to repent having
received the bishop with his secretary and other priests.
"It was nearly the ruin of our community. The intercourse of the priests
with a certain number of nuns" she said, "was the cause of so much
disorder and scandal, that I was deputed with some other nuns, to the bishop to
respectfully request him not to prolong his stay in our nunnery. I told him, in
my name, and in the name of many others, that if he would not comply with our
legitimate request, we should instantly leave the house, go back to our
families and get married, that it was better to be honestly married than to
continue to live as the priests, even our father confessors, wanted us to
do."
After she had given me several other spicy stories of those interesting distant
days, I asked her if she had known Maria Monk, when she was in their house, and
what she thought of her book, "Awful Disclosures?" "I have known
her well," she said. "She spent six months with us. I have read her
book, which was given me, that I might refute it. But after reading it, I
refused to have anything to do with that deplorable exposure. There are surely
some inventions and suppositions in that book. But there is sufficient amount
of truth to cause all our nunneries to be pulled down by the people, if only
the half of them were known to the public!"
She then said to me: "For God's sake, do not reveal these things to the
world, till the last one of us is dead, if God spares you." She then
covered her face with her hands, burst into tears, and left the room.
I remained horrified. Her words fell upon me as a thunderbolt. I regretted
having heard them, though I was determined to respect her request not to reveal
the terrible secret she had entrusted to me. My God knows that I never repeated
a word of it till now. But I think it is my duty to reveal to my country and
the whole world the truth on that grave subject, as it was given me by a most
respectable and unimpeachable eyewitness.
The terrible secrets which Sister Urtubise had revealed to me rendered my stay
in the Hotel Dieu as unpleasant as it had been agreeable at first. Though not
quiet recovered I left, the same day, for Longueuil, where I entered the
monastery with a heavy heart. The day before, two of the fathers had come back
from a two or three months' evangelical excursion among the lumber men, who
were cutting wood in the forests along the Ottawa River and its tributaries,
from one to two hundred miles north-west of Montreal. I was glad to hear of
their arrival. I hoped that the interesting history of their evangelical
excursions, narrow escapes from the bears and the wolves of the forests; their
hearty receptions by the honest and sturdy lumber men, which the superior had
requested me, some weeks before, to write, would cause a happy diversion from
the deplorable things I had recently learned. But only one of those fathers
could be seen, and his conversation was anything but interesting and pleasant.
There was evidently a dark cloud around him. And the other Oblate, his
companion, where was he? The very day of his arrival, he had been ordered to
keep his room, and make a retreat of ten days, during which time he was
forbidden to speak to anyone.
I inquired from a devoted friend among the old Oblates the reason of such a
strange thing. After promising never to reveal to the superiors the sad secret
he trusted me with, he said: "Poor Father Dhas seduced one of his fair
penitents, on the way. She was a married woman, the lady of the house where our
missionaries used to receive the most cordial hospitality. The husband having
discovered the infidelity of his wife, came very near killing her; he
ignominiously turned out the two fathers, and wrote a terrible letter to the
superior. The companion of the guilty father denounced him, an confessed
everything to the superior, who has seen that the letter of the enraged husband
was only giving too true and correct a version of the whole unfortunate and
shameful occurrence. Now, the poor, weak father for his penance, is condemned
to ten days of seclusion from the rest of the community. He must pass that
whole time in prayer, fasting, and acts of humiliation, dictated by the
superior."
"Do these deplorable facts occur very often among the father
Oblates?" I asked.
My friend raised his eyes, filled with tears, to heaven, and with a deep sigh,
he answered: "Dear Father Chiniquy, would to God that I might be able to
tell you that it is the first crime of that nature committed by an Oblate. But
alas! you know, by what has occurred with our female cook not long ago, that it
is not the first time that some of our fathers have brought disgrace upon us
all. And you know also the abominable life of Father Telmont with the two nuns
at Ottawa!"
"If it be so," I replied, "where is the spiritual advantage of
the regular clergy over the secular?"
"The only advantage I see," answered my friend, "is that the
regular clergy gives himself with more impunity to every kind of debauch and
licentiousness than the secular. The monks being concealed from the eyes of the
public, inside the walls of their monastery, where nobody, or at least very few
people, have any access, are more easily conquered by the devil, and more firmly
kept in his chains, than the secular priests. The sharp eyes of the public, and
the daily intercourse the secular priests have with their relations and
parishioners, form a powerful and salutary restraint upon the bad inclinations
of our depraved nature. In the monastery, there is no restraint except the
childish and ridiculous punishments of retreats, kissing of the floor, or of
the feet, prostration upon the ground, as Father Burnette did, a few days after
your coming among us.
"There is surely more hypocrisy and selfishness among the regular than the
secular clergy. That great social organization which forms the human family is
a divine work. Yes! those great social organizations which are called the city,
the township, the country, the parish, and the household, where every one is
called to work in the light of day, is a divine organization, and makes society
as strong, pure, and holy as it can be.
"I confess that there are also terrible temptations, and deplorable falls
there, but the temptations are not so unconquerable, and the falls not so
irreparable, as in these dark recesses and unhealthy prisons raised by Satan
only for the birds of night, called monasteries or nunneries.
"The priest and the woman who falls in the midst of a well-organized
Christian society, break the hearts of the beloved mother, covers with shame a
venerable father, cause the tears of cherished sisters and brothers to flow,
pierce, with a barbed arrow, the hearts of thousands of friends; they for ever
lose their honour and good name. These considerations are so many providential,
I dare say Divine, shields, to protect the sons and daughters of Eve against
their own frailty. The secular priest and the women shrink before throwing
themselves into such a bottomless abyss of shame, misery, and regret. But
behind the thick and dark walls of the monastery, or the nunnery, what has the
fallen monk or nun to fear? Nobody will hear of it, no bad consequences worth
mentioning will follow, except a few days of retreat, some insignificant,
childish, ridiculous penances, which the most devoted in the monastery are
practicing almost every day.
"As you ask me in earnest what are the advantages of a monastic life over
a secular, in a moral and social point of view, I will answer you. In the
monastery, man, as the image of God, forgets his divine origin, loses his
dignity; and as a Christian, he loses the most holy weapons Christ has given to
His disciples to fight the battle of life. He, at once and for ever, loses that
law of self-respect, and respect for others, which is one of the most powerful
and legitimate barriers against vice. Yes! That great and divine law of
self-respect, which God Himself has implanted in the heart of every man and
woman who live in a Christian society, is completely destroyed in the monastery
and nunnery. The foundation of perfection in the monk and the nun is that they
must consider themselves as corpses. Do you not see that this principle strikes
at the root of all that God has made good, grand, and holy in man? Does it not
sweep away every idea of holiness, purity, greatness! every principle of life
which the Gospel of Christ had for its mission to reveal to the fallen children
of Adam?
"What self-respect can we expect from a corpse? and what respect can a corpse
feel for the other corpses which surround it? Thus it is that the very idea of
monastic perfection carries with it the destruction of all that is good, pure,
holy, and spiritual in the religion of the Gospel. It destroys the very idea of
life to put death into its place.
"It is for that reason that if you study the true history, not the lying
history, of monachism, you will find the details of a corruption impossible,
anywhere else, not even among the lowest houses of prostitution. Read the
Memoirs of Scipio de Ricci, one of the most pious and intelligent bishops our
Church has ever had, and you will see that the monks and the nuns of Italy live
the very life of the brutes in the fields. Yes! read the terrible revelations
of what is going on among those unfortunate men and women, whom in the iron
hand of monachism keeps tied in their dark dungeons, you will hear from the
very lips of the nuns that the monks are more free with them than the husbands
are with their legitimate wives; you will see that every one of those monastic
institutions is a new Sodom!
"The monastic axiom, that the highest point of perfection is attained only
when you consider yourself a corpse in the hand of your superior, is
anti-social and Antichristian: it is simply diabolical. It transforms into a
vile machine that man whom God had created in His likeness, and made for ever
free. It degrades below the brute that man whom Christ, by His death, has
raised to the dignity of a child of God, and an inheritor of an eternal kingdom
in Heaven. Everything is mechanical, material, false, in the life of a monk and
a nun. Even the best virtues are deceptions and lies. The monks and the nuns
being perfect only when they have renounced their own free-will and
intelligence to become corpses, can have neither virtues or vices.
"Their best actions are mechanical. Their acts of humility are to crawl
under the table and kiss the feet of each other, or to make a cross on a dirty
floor with the tongue, or lie down in the dust to let the rest of the monks or
the nuns pass over them! Have you not remarked how those so-called monks speak
with the utmost contempt of the rest of the world? One must have opportunities
as I have had of seeing the profound hatred which exists among all monastic
orders against each other. How the Dominicans have always hated the
Franciscans, and how they both hate the Jesuits, who pay them back in the same
coin! What a strong and nameless hatred divides the Oblates, to whom we belong,
from the Jesuits! The Jesuits never lose an opportunity of showing us their
supreme contempt! You are aware that, on account of those bad feelings, it is
absolutely forbidden to an Oblate to confess to a Jesuit, as we know it is
forbidden to the Jesuits to confess to an Oblate, or to any other priest.
"I need not tell you, for you know, that their vow of poverty is a mask to
help them to become rich with more rapidity than the rest of the world. Is it
not under the mask of that vow that the monks of England, Scotland, and France
became the masters of the richest lands of those countries, which the nations
were forced, by bloody revolutions, to wrench from their grasp?
"Is it not still under the mask of extreme poverty that the monks of Italy
are among the richest proprietors in that unfortunate country?
"I have seen much more of the world than you. When a young priest, I was
the chaplain, confessor, and intimate friend of the Duchess de Berry, the
mother of Henry V, now the only legitimate king of France. When, in the midst
of those great and rich princes and nobles of France, I never saw such a love
of money, of honour, of vain glory, as I have seen among the monks since I have
become one of them. When the Duchess de Berry finished her providential work in
France, after making the false step which ruined her, I threw myself into the
religious order of the Chartreux. I have lived several years in their palatial
monastery of Rome; have cultivated and enjoyed their sweet fruits in their
magnificent gardens; but I was not there long without seeing the fatal error I
had committed in becoming a monk. During the many years I resided in that
splendid mansion, where laziness, stupidity, filthiness, gluttony,
superstition, tediousness, ignorance, pride, and unmentionable immoralities,
with very few exceptional cases, reigned supreme, I had every opportunity to
know what was going on in their midst. Life soon became an unbearable burden,
but for the hope I had of breaking my fetters. At last I found out that the
best, if not the only way of doing this, was to declare to the Pope that I
wanted to go and preach the gospel to the savages of America, which was, and is
still true.
"I made my declaration, and by the Pope's permission the doors of my goal
were opened, with the condition that I should join the order of the Oblates
Immaculate, in connection with which I should evangelize the savages of the
Rocky Mountains.
"I have found among the monks of Canada the very same things I have seen
among those of France and Italy. With very few exceptions they are all corpses,
absolutely dead to every sentiment of true honesty and real Christianity; they
are putrid carcasses, which have lost the dignity of manhood.
"My dear Father Chiniquy," he added, "I trust you as I trust
myself, when I tell you for our own good a secret which is known to God alone.
When I am on the Rocky Mountains, I will raise myself up, as the eagles of
those vast countries, and I shall go up to the regions of liberty, light, and
life; I will cease being a corpse, to become what my God has made me a free and
intelligent man: I will cease to be a corpse, in order to become one of the
redeemed of Christ, who serve God in spirit and in truth.
"Christ is the light of the world; monachism is its night! Christ is the
strength, the glory, the life of man; monachism is its decay, shame, and death!
Christ died to make us free; the monastery is built up to make slaves of us!
Christ died that we might be raised to the dignity of children of God;
monachism is established to bring us down much below he living brutes, for it
transforms us into corpses! Christ is the highest conception of humanity;
monachism is its lowest!
"Yes, yes, I hope my God will soon give me the favour I have asked so
long! When I shall be on the top of the Rocky Mountains, I will, for ever,
break my fetters. I will rise from my tomb; I will come out from among the
dead, to sit at the table of the redeemed, and eat the bread of the living
children of God!"
I do regret that the remarkable monk, whose abridged views on monachism I have
here given, should have requested me never to give his name, when he allows me
to tell some of his adventures, which will make a most interesting romance.
Faithful to his promise, he went, as an Oblate, to preach to the savages of the
Rocky Mountains, and there, without noise, he slipped out of their hands; broke
his chains to live the life of a freedman of Christ, in the holy bonds of a
Christian marriage with a respectable American lady.
Weak and timid soldier that I was once; frightened by the ruins spread
everywhere on the battle-field, I looked around to find a shelter against the
impending danger; I thought that the monastery of the Oblates of Mary
Immaculate was one of those strong towers, built by my God, where the arrows of
the enemy could not reach me, and I threw myself into it.
But, hardly beginning to hope that I was out of danger, behind those dark and
high walls, when I saw them shaking like a drunken man; and the voice of God
passed like a hurricane over me.
Suddenly, the high towers and walls around me fell to the ground, and were
turned into dust. Not one stone remained on another.
And I heard a voice saying to me: "Soldier! come out and get in the light
of the sun; trust no more in the walls built by the hand of man; they are
nothing but dust. Come and fight in the open day, under the eyes of God,
protected only by the gospel banner of Christ! come out from behind those walls
they are a diabolical deception, a snare, a fraud!"
I listened to the voice, and I bade adieu to the inmates of the monastery of
the Oblates of Mary Immaculate.
When, on the 1st of November, 1847, I pressed them on my heart for the last
time, I felt the burning tears of many of them falling on my cheeks, and my
tears moistened their faces: for they loved me, and I loved them. I had met
there several noble hearts and precious souls worthy of a better fate. Oh! if I
could have, at the price of my life, given them the light and liberty which my
merciful God had given me! But they were in the dark; and there was no power in
me to change their darkness into light. The hand of God brought me back to my
dear Canada, that I might again offer it the sweat and the labours, the love
and life of the least of its sons.
.
CHAPTER 43
The
eleven months spent in the monastery of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate, were
among the greatest favours God has granted me. What I had read of the monastic
orders, and what my honest, though deluded imagination, had painted of the
holiness, purity, and happiness of the monastic life, could not be blotted out
of my mind, except by a kind of miraculous interposition. No testimony whatever
could have convinced me that the monastic institutions were not one of the most
blessed of the Gospel. Their existence, in the bosom of the Church of Rome,
was, for me, an infallible token of her divine institution, and miraculous
preservation; and their absence among Protestants, one of the strongest proofs
that these heretics were entirely separated from Christ. Without religious
orders the Protestant denominations were to me, as dead and decayed branches
cut from the true vine, which are doomed to perish.
But, just as the eyes of Thomas were opened, and his intelligence was convinced
of the divinity of Christ, only after he had seen the wounds in his hands and
side, so I could never have believed that the monastic institutions were of
heathen and diabolical origin, if my God had not forced me to see with my own
eyes, and to touch with my fingers, their unspeakable corruptions.
Though I remained, for some time longer, a sincere Catholic priest, I dare say
that God Himself had just broken the strongest tie of my affections and respect
for that Church.
It is true that several pillars remained, on which my robust faith in the holiness
and apostolicity of the Church rested for a few years longer, but I must here
confess to the glory of God, that the most solid of these pillars had for ever
crumbled to pieces, when in the monastery of Longueuil.
Long before my leaving the Oblates, many influential priests of the district of
Montreal had told me that my only chance of success, if I wanted to continue my
crusade against the demon of drunkenness, was to work alone. "Those monks
are pretty good speakers on temperance," they unanimously said, "but
they are nothing else than a band of comedians. After delivering their eloquent
tirades against the use of intoxicating drinks, to the people, the first thing
they do is to ask for a bottle of wine, which soon disappears! What fruit can
we expect from the preaching of men who do not believe a word of what they say,
and who are the first, among themselves, to turn their own arguments into
ridicule? It is very different with you; you believe what you say; you are
consistent with yourself; your hearers feel it; your profound, scientific, and
Christian convictions pass into them with an irresistible power. God visibly
blesses your work with a marvelous success! Come to us," said the curates,
"not as sent by the superior of the Oblates, but as sent, by God Himself,
to regenerate Canada. Present yourself as a French
Canadian priest; a child of the people. That people will hear you with more
pleasure, and follow your advice with more perseverance. Let them know and feel
that Canadian blood runs in your veins; that a Canadian heart beats in your
breast; continue to be, in the future, what you have been in the past. Let the
sentiments of the true patriot be united with those of a Catholic priest; and
when you address the people of Canada, the citadels of Satan will crumble
everywhere before you in the district of Montreal, as they have done in that of
Quebec."
At the head of the French Canadian curates, who thus spoke, was my venerable
personal friend and benefactor, the Rev. Mr. Brassard, curate of Longueuil. He
had not only been one of my most devoted friends and teachers, when I was
studying in the college at Nicolet, but had helped me, with his own money, to
go through the last four years of my studies, when I was too poor to meet my
collegiate expenses. No one had thought more highly than he of the Oblates of
Mary Immaculate, when they first settled in Canada. But their monastery was too
near his parsonage for their own benefit. His sharp eyes, high intelligence,
and integrity of character, soon detected that there was more false varnish
than pure gold, on their glittering escutcheon. Several love scrapes between
some of the Oblates and the pretty young ladies of his parish, and the long
hours of night spent by Father Allard with the nuns, established in his
village, under the pretext of teaching them grammar and arithmetic, had filled
him with disgust. But what had absolutely destroyed his confidence, was the
discovery of a long-suspected iniquity, which at first seemed incredible to
him. Father Guigues, the superior, after his nomination, but before his
installation to the Bishopric of Ottawa, had been closely watched, and at last
discovered when opening the letters of Mr. Brassard, which, many times, had
passed from the post office, through his hands. That criminal action had come
very near to being brought before the legal courts by Mr. Brassard; this was
avoided only by Father Guigues acknowledging his guilt, asking pardon in the
most humiliating way, before me and several other witnesses.
Long before I left the Oblates, Mr. Brassard had said to me: "The Oblates
are not the men you think them to be. I have been sorely disappointed in them,
and your disappointment will be no less than mine, when your eyes are opened. I
know that you will not remain long in their midst. I offer you, in advance, the
hospitality of my parsonage, when your conscience calls you out of their
monastery!"
I availed myself of this kind invitation on the evening of the 1st of November,
1847.
The next week was spent in preparing the memoir which I intended to present to
my Lord Bourget, Bishop of Montreal, as an explanation of my leaving the
Oblates. I knew that he was disappointed and displeased with the step I had
taken.
The curate of Chambly, Rev. Mr. Mignault, having gone to the bishop, to express
his joy that I had left the monks, in order to serve again in the church, in
the ranks of the secular clergy, had been very badly received. The bishop had
answered him: "Mr. Chiniquy may leave the Oblates if he likes; but he will
be disappointed if he expects to work in my diocese. I do not want his
services."
This did not surprise me. I knew that those monks had been imported by him,
from France, and that they were pets of his. When I entered their monastery,
just eleven months before, he was just starting for Rome, and expressed to me
the pleasure he felt that I was to join them. My reasons, however, were so
good, and the memoir I was preparing was so full of undoubted facts and
unanswerable arguments, that I was pretty sure, not only to appease the wrath
of my bishop, but to gain his esteem more firmly than before. I was not
disappointed in my expectation.
A few days later I called upon his lordship, and was received very coldly. He
said: "I cannot conceal from you my surprise and pain at the rasp step you
have taken. What a shame, for all your friends to see your want of consistency
and perseverance! Had you remained among those good monks, your moral strength,
could have been increased more than tenfold. But you have stultified yourself
in the eyes of the people, as well as in mine; you have lost the confidence of
your best friends, by leaving, without good reasons, the company of such holy
men. Some bad rumours are already afloat against you, which give us to
understand that you are an unmanageable man, a selfish priest, whom the
superiors have been forced to turn out as a black sheep, whose presence could
not be any longer tolerated inside the peaceful walls of that holy
monastery."
Those words were uttered with an expression of bad feeling which told me that I
had not heard the tenth part of what he had in his heart. However, as I came
into his presence prepared to hear all kinds of bad reports, angry reproaches,
and humiliating insinuations, I remained perfectly calm. I had, in advance,
resolved to hear all his unfriendly, insulting remarks, just as if they were
addressed to another person, a perfect stranger to me. The last three days had
been spent in prayers to obtain that favour. My God had evidently head me; for
the storm passed over me without exciting the least unpleasant feelings in my
soul.
I answered: "My lord, allow me to tell you that, in taking the solemn step
of leaving the monastery of Longueuil, I was not afraid of what the world would
say, or think of me. My only desire is to save my soul, and give the rest of my
life to my country and my God, in a more efficacious way than I have yet done.
The rumours which seem to trouble your lordship about my supposed expulsion
from the Oblates do not affect me in the least, for they are without the least
foundation. From the first to the last day of my stay in that monastery, all
the inmates, from the superior to the last one, have overwhelmed me with the
most sincere marks of kindness, and even of respect. If you had seen the tears
which were shed by the brothers, when I bade them adieu, you would have
understood that I never had more devoted and sincere friends than the members
of that religious community. Please read this important document, and you will
see that I have kept my good name during my stay in that monastery." I
handed him the following testimonial letter which the superior had given me
when I left:
"I, the undersigned, Superior of the Noviciate of the Oblates of Mary
Immaculate at Longueuil, do certify that the conduct of Mr. Chiniquy, when in
our monastery, has been worthy of the sacred character which he possesses, and
after this year of solitude, he does not less deserve the confidence of his
brethren in the holy ministry than before. We wish, moreover, to give our
testimony of his preserving zeal in the cause of temperance. We think that
nothing was more of a nature to give a character of stability to that admirable
reform, and to secure its perfect success, than the profound reflections and
studies of Mr. Chiniquy, when in the solitude of Longueuil, on the importance
of that work.
"T. F. Allard,
"Superior of the Noviciate O.M.I."
It
was really most pleasant for me to see that every line of that document read by
the bishop was blotting out some of the stern and unfriendly lines which were
on his face, when speaking to me. Nothing was more amiable than his manners,
when he handed it back to me, saying: "I thank God to see that you are
still as worthy of my esteem and confidence, as when you entered that monastery.
But would you be kind enough to give me the real reasons why you have so
abruptly separated from the Oblates?"
"Yes, my lord, I will give them to you; but your lordship knows that there
are things of such a delicate nature, that the lips of man shiver and rebel
when required to utter them. Such are some of the deplorable things which I
have to mention to your lordship. I have put those reasons in these pages,
which I respectfully request your lordship to read," and I handed him the
Memoir, about thirty pages long, which I had prepared. The bishop read, very
carefully five or six pages, and said: "Are you positive as to the
exactness of what you write here?"
"Yes, my lord! They are as true and real as I am here."
The bishop turned pale and remained a few minutes silent, biting his lips, and
after a deep sigh, said: "Is it your intention to reveal those sad
mysteries to the world, or can we hope that you will keep that secret?"
"My lord," I answered, "if your lordship and the Oblates deal
with me, as I hope they will do, as with an honourable Catholic priest; if I am
kept in the position which an honest priest has a right to fill in the church,
I consider myself bound, in conscience and honour, to keep those things secret.
But, if from any abuse, persecutions emanating from the Oblates, or any other
party, I am obliged to give to the world the true reasons of my leaving that
monastic order, your lordship understands that, in self-defense, I will be
forced to make these revelations!"
"But the Oblates cannot say a word, or do anything wrong against
you," promptly answered the bishop, "after the honourable testimony
they have given you."
"It is true, my lord, that I have no reason to fear anything from the
Oblates!" I answered; "but those religious men are not the only ones
who might force me to defend myself. You know another who has my future
destinies in his hands. You know that my future course will be shaped by h is
own toward me."
With an amiable smile the bishop answered:
"I understand you. But I pledge myself that you have nothing to fear from
that quarter. Though I frankly tell you that I would have preferred seeing you
work as a member of that monastic institution, it may be that it is more
according to the will of God, that you should go among the people, as sent by
God, rather than by a superior, who might be your inferior in the eyes of many,
in that glorious temperance, of which you are evidently the blessed apostle in
Canada. I am glad to tell you that I have spoken of you to his holiness, and he
requested me to give you a precious medal, which bears his most perfect
features, with a splendid crucifix. His holiness has graciously attached three
hundred days' for indulgences to every one who will take the pledge of
temperance in kissing the feet of that crucifix. Wait a moment," added the
bishop, "I will go and get them and present them to you."
When the bishop returned, holding in his hands those two infallible tokens of
the kind sentiments of the Pope towards me, I fell on my knees to receive them
and press them both to my lips with the utmost respect. My feelings of joy and
gratitude in that happy hour cannot be expressed. I remained mute, for some
time, with surprise and admiration, when holding those precious things which
were coming to me, as I then sincerely believed, from the very successor of
Peter, and the true Vicar of Christ Himself. When handing me those sacred
gifts, the bishop addressed me the kindest words which a bishop can utter to
his priest, or a father to his beloved son. He granted me the power to preach
and hear confessions all over his diocese, and he dismissed me only after
having put his hand on my head and asked God to pour upon me His most abundant
benedictions everywhere I should go to work in the holy cause of temperance in
Canada.
.
CHAPTER 44
Our
adorable Saviour said: "What king, going to make war against another king,
sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able, with ten thousand,
to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? (Luke xiv. 31). To
follow that advice, how often had I fallen on my knees before my God, to
implore the necessary strength and wisdom to meet that terrible enemy which was
marching against me and my brethren! Often I was so discouraged by the sense of
my personal incapacity, that I came near fainting and flying away at the sight
of the power and resources of the foe! But the dear Saviour's voice had as many
times strengthened me, saying! "Fear not, I am with thee!" He seemed
at every hour to whisper in my ears, "Be of good cheer, I have overcome
the world!" (John xvi. 33). Trusting, then, in my God, alone, for victory,
I nevertheless understood that my duty was to arm myself with the weapons which
the learned and the wise men of the past ages had prepared. I again studied the
best works written on the subject of wine, from the learned naturalist, Pliny,
to the celebrated Sir Astley Cooper. I not only compiled a multitude of
scientific notes, arguments, and facts from these books, but prepared a
"Manual of Temperance," which obtained so great a success, for such a
small country as Canada, that it went through four editions of twenty-five
thousand copies in less than four years. But my best source of information and
wisdom was from letters received from Father Mathew, and my personal interviews
with him, when he visited the United States.
The first time I met him, in Boston, he told me how he regretted his having, at
first, too much relied on the excitement and enthusiasm of the multitudes.
"Those fits," he said, "pass away as quickly as the clouds of
the storm; and they, too often, leave no more traces of their passage.
Persevere in the resolution you have taken in the beginning, never to give the
pledge, except when you give a complete course of lectures on the damning effects
of intoxicating drinks. How can we expect that the people will for ever give up
beverages which they honestly, though ignorantly, believe to be beneficial and
necessary to their body? The first thing we do we must demonstrate to them that
these alcoholic drinks are absolutely destructive of their temporal, as well as
of their eternal life. So long as the priest and the people believe, as they do
today, that rum, brandy, wine, beer, and cider give strength to help man to
keep up his health in the midst of his hard labours; that they warm his blood
in winter and cool it in the summer; all our efforts, and even our successes,
will be like the bundle of straw, which makes a bright light, attracts the
attention for a moment, and leaves nothing but smoke and cinders.
"Hundreds of times I have seen my Irish countrymen honestly taking the
pledge for life; but before a week had elapsed, they had obtained a release
from their priests, under the impression that they were unable to earn their
own living and support their families, without drinking those detestable drugs.
Very few priests in Ireland have taken the pledge, and still fewer have kept
it. In New York, only two Irish priests have given up their intoxicating glass,
and the very next week I met both of them drunk! Archbishop Hughes turned my
humble efforts into ridicule, before his priests, in my own presence, and drank
a glass of brandy to my health with them at his own table to mock me. And here
in Boston the drinking habits of the bishop and his priests are such, that I
have been forced, through self-respect, to quietly withdraw from his palace and
come to this hotel. This bad conduct paralyses and kills me."
In saying these last words, that good and noble man burst into a fit of
convulsive sobs and tears; his breast was heaving under his vain efforts to
suppress his sighs. He concealed his face in his hands, and for nearly ten
minutes he could not utter a word. The spectacle of the desolation of a man
whom God has raised so high, and so much blessed, and the tears of one who had
himself dried so many tears, and brought so much joy, peace, and comfort, to so
many desolate homes, has been one of the most solemn lessons my God ever gave
me. I then learned more clearly than ever, that all the glory of the world is
Vanity, and that one of the greatest acts of folly is to rely, for happiness,
on the praises of men and the success of our own labours. For who had received
more merited praises, and who had seen his own labours more blessed by God and
man, than Father Mathew, whom all ages will call "The Apostle of
Temperance of Ireland?"
My gratitude to Mr. Brassard caused me to choose his parish, near Montreal, for
the first grand battlefield of the impending struggle against the enemy of my
God and my country; and the first week of Advent determined upon for the
opening of the campaign. But the nearer the day chosen to draw the sword
against the modern Goliath, the more I felt the solemnity of my position, and
the more I needed the help of Him on whom alone we can trust for light and
strength.
I had determined never to lecture on temperance in any place, without having
previously inquired, from the most reliable sources, about: (1) The number of
deaths and accidents caused by drunkenness the last fifteen or twenty years.
(2) The number of orphans and widows made by drunkenness. (3) The number of
rich families ruined, and the number of poor families made poorer by the same
cause. (4) The approximate sum of money expended by the people during the last
twenty years.
As the result of my enquiries, I learned that during that short period, that 32
men had lost their lives when drunk; and through their drunkenness 25 widows
and 73 orphans had been left in the lowest degree of poverty! 72 rich families
had been entirely ruined and turned out of their once happy homes by the demon
of intemperance, and 90 kept poor. More than three hundred thousand dollars
(300,000 dollars) had been paid in cash, without counting the loss of time, for
the intoxicating beverages drank by the people of Longueuil during the last
twenty years.
For three days, I spoke twice a day to crowded houses. My first text was:
"Look not thou upon the wine when it is red, when it giveth his colour in
the cup: when it moveth itself aright. At the last it biteth like a serpent,
and stingeth like an adder" (Prov. xxiii. 31,32).
The first day I showed how alcoholic beverages were biting like a serpent and
stinging like an adder, by destroying the lungs, the brains, and the liver, the
nerves and the muscles, the blood and the very life of man. The second day I
proved that intoxicating drinks were the most implacable and cruel enemies of
the fathers, the mothers, the children; of the young and the old; of the rich
and the poor; of the farmers, the merchants, and the mechanics; the parish and
the country. The third day I proved, clearly, that those intoxicating liquors
were the enemy of the intelligence, and the soul of man; the gospel of Christ
and of His holy Church; the enemy of all the rights of man and the laws of God.
My conclusion was, that we were all bound to raise our hands against that
gigantic and implacable foe, whose arm was raised against every one of us. I
presented the thrilling tableau of our friends, near and dear relations, and
neighbours, fallen and destroyed around us; the thousands of orphans and
widows, whose fathers and husbands had been slaughtered by strong drink. I
brought before their minds the true picture of the starving children, the
destitute widows and mothers, whose life had to be spent in tears, ignominy,
desolation and unspeakable miseries, from the daily use of strong drink. I was
not half through my address when tears flowed from every eye. The cries and
sobs so much drowned my voice, that I had several times to stop speaking for a few
minutes.
Then holding the crucifix, blessed and given to me by the Pope, I showed what
Christ had suffered on the cross for sins engendered by the use of intoxicating
drinks. And I requested them to listen to the voices of the thousands of
desolate orphans, widows, wives and mothers, coming from every corner of the
land; the voices of their priests and their church; the voices of the angels,
the Virgin Mary and the saints in heaven; the voice of Jesus Christ their
Saviour, calling them to put an end to the deluge of evils and unspeakable
iniquities caused by the use of those cursed drinks; "for," said I,
"those liquors are cursed by millions of mothers and children, widows and
orphans, who owe to them a life of shame, tears, and untold desolation. They are
cursed by the Virgin Mary and the angels who are the daily witnesses of the
iniquities with which they deluge the world. They are cursed by the millions of
souls which they have plunged into eternal misery. They are cursed by Jesus
Christ, from whose hands they have wrenched untold millions of souls, for whom
He died on Calvary."
Every one of those truths, incontrovertible for Roman Catholics, were falling
with irresistible power on that multitude of people. The distress and
consternation were so profound and universal, that they reacted, at last, on
the poor speaker, who several times could not express what he himself felt
except with his tears and his sobs.
When I hoped that, by the great mercy of God, all resistances were subdued, the
obstacles removed, the intelligence enlightened, the wills conquered, I closed
the address, which had lasted more than two hours, by an ardent prayer to God
to grant us the grace to give up for ever the use of those terrible poisons,
and I requested everyone to repeat with me, in their hearts, the solemn pledge
of temperance in the following words:
"Adorable and dear Saviour, Jesus Christ, who died on the cross to take
away my sins and save my guilty soul, for Thy glory, the good of my brethren
and of my country, as well as for my own good, I promise, with Thy help, never
to drink, not to give to anybody any intoxicating beverages, except when
ordered by an honest physician."
Our merciful God had visibly blessed the work and His unprofitable servant. The
success was above our sanguine expectations. Two thousand three hundred
citizens of Longueuil enrolled under the pledge, I asked them to come to the
foot of the altar and kiss the crucifix I was holding, as the public and solemn
pledge of their engagement.
The first thing done by the majority of the intelligent farmers of Longueuil,
on the return from the church, was to break their decanters and their barrels,
and spill the last drop of the accursed drink on the ground. Seven days later,
there were eighty requests in my hands to go and show the ravages of alcoholic
liquors to man other parishes. Boucherville, Chambly, Varennes, St. Hyacinthe,
ect., Three Rivers, the great city of Montreal, Three Rivers, and St.
Hyacinthe, one after the other, raised the war cry against the usages of
intoxicating drinks, with a unanimity and determination which seemed to be more
miraculous than natural. During the four years, I gave 1,800 public addresses,
in 200 parishes, with the same fruits, and enrolled more than 200,000 people
under the banners of temperance. Everywhere, the taverns, the distilleries and
breweries were shut, and their owners forced to take other trades to make a
living; not on account of any stringent law, but by the simple fact that the
whole people had ceased drinking their beverages, after having been fully
persuaded that they were injurious to their bodies, opposed to their happiness,
and ruinous to their souls.
The convictions were so unanimous and strong on that subject, that, in many
places, the last evening I spent in their midst, the merchants used to take all
their barrels or rum, beer, wine and brandy to the public squares, make a
pyramid of them, to which I was invited to set fire. The whole population,
attracted by the novelty and sublimity of that spectacle, would then fill the
air with their cries and shouts of joy. When the husbands and wives, the
parents and children of the redeemed drunkards rent the air with their cries of
joy at the destruction of their enemy, and the fire was in full blaze, one of the
merchants would give me an axe to stave in the last barrel of rum. After the
last drop was emptied, I usually stood on it to address some parting words to
the people.
Such a spectacle baffles any description. The brilliant light of the pine and
cedar trees, mixed with all kinds of inflammable materials which everyone had
been invited to bring, changed the darkest hour of that night into the
brightest of days. The flames, fed by the fiery liquid, shot forth their
tongues of fire towards heaven, as if to praise their great God, whose merciful
hand had brought the marvelous reformation we were celebrating. The thousand
faces, illuminated by the blaze, beamed with joy. The noise of the cracking
barrels, mixed with that of a raging fire; the cries and shouts of that
multitude, with the singing of the Te Deum, formed a harmony which filled every
soul with sentiments of unspeakable happiness. But where shall I find words to
express my feelings, when I had finished speaking! The mothers and wives to
whom our blessed temperance had given back a loving husband and some dear
children, were crowding around me with their families and redeemed ones, to
thank me, press my hands to their lips, and water them with their grateful
tears.
The only thing which marred that joy were the exaggerated honours and unmerited
praises with which I was really overwhelmed. I was, at first, forced to
received an ovation from the curates and people of Longueuil and the
surrounding parishes, when they presented to me my portrait, painted by the
artist Hamel, which filled me with confusion, for I felt so keenly that I did
not deserve such honours. But it was still worse at the end of May, 1849. Judge
Mondelet was deputed by the bishop and the priests and the city of Montreal,
accompanied by 15,000 people, to present me with a gold medal, and a gift of
four hundred dollars.
But the greatest surprise my God had in store for me, was kept for the end of
June, 1850. At that time, I was deputed by 40,000 tee-totalers, to present a
petition to the Parliament of Toronto, in order to make the rum sellers
responsible for the ravages caused to the families of the poor drunkards to
whom they had sold their poisonous drugs. The House of Commons having kindly
appointed a committee of ten members to help me to frame that bill, it was an
easy matter to have it pass through the three branches. I was present when they
discussed and accepted that bill. Napoleon was not more happy after he had won
the battle of Austerlitz, than I was when I heard that my pet bill had become
law, and that hereafter, the innocent victims of the drunken father or husband
would receive an indemnity from the landsharks who were fattening on their
poverty and unspeakable miseries.
But what was my surprise and consternation, when, immediately after the passing
of that bill, the Hon. Dewitt rose and proposed that a public expression of
gratitude should be given me by Parliament, under the form of a large pecuniary
gift! His speech seemed to me filled with such exaggerated eulogiums, that I would
have been tempted to think it was mockery, had I not known that the Protestant
gentleman was one of my most sincere friends. He was followed by the
Honourables Baldwin and Lafontaine, Ministers at that time, and half a dozen
other members, who went still further into what I so justly consider the
regions of exaggeration. It seemed to me bordering on blasphemy to attribute to
Chiniquy a reformation which was so clearly the work of my merciful God. The
speeches on that subject lasted two hours, and were followed by a unanimous
vote to present me with $500, as a public testimony of the gratitude of the
people for my labours in the temperance reform of Canada. Previous to that, the
Bishops of Quebec and Montreal had given me tokens of their esteem which, though
unmerited, had been better appreciated by me.
When in May, 1850, Archbishop Turgeon, of Quebec, sent the Rev. Charles
Baillargeon, curate of Quebec, to Rome, to become his successor, he advised him
to come to Longueuil, and get a letter from me, which he might present to the
Pope, with a volume of my "Temperance Manual." I complied with his
request, and wrote to the Pope. Some months later, I received the following
lines:
Rome, Aug. 10th, 1850.
Rev. Mr. Chiniquy,
Sir and dear friend;Monday, the 12th was the first opportunity given me to have
a private audience with the Sovereign Pontiff. I presented him your book, with
your letter, which he received, I will not say with that goodness which is so
eminently characteristic of him, but with all special marks of satisfaction and
approbation, while charging me to state to you that he accords his apostolic
benediction to you and to the holy work of temperance you preach. I consider
myself happy to have had to offer on your behalf, to the Vicar of Jesus Christ,
a book which, after it had done so much good to my countrymen, had been able to
draw from his venerable lips, such solemn words of approbation of the
temperance society and of blessings on those who are its apostles; and it is
also, for my heart, a very sweet pleasure to transmit them to you.
Your friend,
Charles Baillargeon
Priest.
A
short time before I received that letter from Rome, Bishop Bourget, of
Montreal, had officially given me the title of "Apostle of
Temperance;" in the following document, which, on account of its
importance, the readers will probably like to have in its original Latin:-
"IGNATIUS BOURGET, Miseratioine Divina et St e. Sedis Apostolic e Gratia,
Episcopus Marianopolitanensis, Etc., Etc., Etc."
"Universis praesentes litteras inspecturis, notum facimus et attestamur
Venerabilem Carolum Chiniquy, Temperantiae Apostolum, Nostrae Diocoecis
Sacerdotem, Nobis optime notum esse, exploratumque habere illum vitam
laudabilem et professione Ecclesiastica consonam agere, nullisque ecclesiasticis
censuris, saltem quae ad nostram devenerunt Notitiam innodatum; qua propter,
per viscera Misericordiae Dei Nostri, obsecramus omnes et Singulos
Archiepiscopos, Episcopos, coeterasque Ecclesiae dignitates ad quos ipsum
declinare contingerit, ut eum, pro Christi Amore, benigne tractare digentur, et
quando cumque ab eo fuerint requisiti, Sacrum Missae Sacrificium ipsi
celebrare, nec non alia munia Ecclesiastica, et pietatis opera exercere
permittant, paratos nos ad similia et majora exhibentes: In quorum fidem,
praesentes litteras signo sigilloque nostris, ac Secretarii Episcopatus nostri
subscriptione communitas expediri mandavimus Marianopoli, in (Edibus Nostris
Beati Jacobi, anno millesimo quinquagesimo. Die vero mensis Junii Sexta.
IG. EPIS. MARIANOPOLITANENSIS.
"J. O. Pare, Can, Secrius."
Translation
"IGNATIUS BOURGET, By the Divine Mercy and Grace of the Holy Apostolic
See, Bishop of Montreal.
"To all who inspect the present letters, we make known and certify that
the venerable Charles Chiniquy, 'Apostle of Temperance,' Priest of our Diocese,
is very well known to us, and we regard him as proved, to lead a praiseworthy
life, and one agreeable to his ecclesiastical profession. Through the tender
mercies of our God, he is under no ecclesiastical censures, at least, which
have come to our knowledge.
"We entreat each and all, Archbishop, Bishop, and other dignitaries of the
Church, to whom it may happen that he may go, that they, for the love of
Christ, entertain him kindly and courteously, and as often as they may be asked
by him, permit him to celebrate the holy sacrifice of the mass, and exercise
other ecclesiastical privileges of piety, being ourselves ready to grant him
these and other greater privileges. In proof of this we have ordered the present
letters and to be prepared under our sign and seal, and with subscription of
our secretary, in our palace of the blessed James, in the year one thousand
eight hundred and fifty, on the sixth day of the month of June.
IGNATIUS, Bishop of Marianopolis.
"By order of the most illustrious and most Reverend Bishop of
Marianopolis, D.D.
"J. O. Pare, Canon, Secretary."
No
words from my pen can give an idea of the distress and shame I felt when these
unmerited praises and public honours began to flow upon me. For, when the siren
voice of my natural pride was near to deceive me, there was the noise of a
sudden storm in my conscience, crying with a louder voice: "Chiniquy, thou
art a sinner, unworthy of such praises and honours."
This conflict made me very miserable. I said to myself, "Are those great
successes due to my merits, my virtues and my eloquence? NO! Surely, No! They
are due to the great mercy of God for my dear country. Shall I not for ever be
put to shame if I consent to these flattering voices which come to me from
morning till night, to make me forget that to my God alone, and not to me, must
be given the praise and glory of that marvelous reform?"
These praises were coming every day, thinker and thicker, through the thousand
trumpets of the press, as well as through the addresses daily presented me from
the places which had been so thoroughly reformed. Those unmerited honours were
bestowed on me by multitudes who came in carriages and on horseback, bearing
flags, with bands of music, to receive me on the borders of their parishes
where the last parishes had just brought me with the same kind of ovations.
Sometimes, the roads were lined on both sides, by thousands and thousands of
maple, pine or spruce trees, which they had carried from distant forests, in
spite of all my protests.
How many times the curates, who were sitting by me in the best carriages, drawn
by the most splendid horses, asked me: "Why do you look so sad, when you
see all these faces beaming with joy?" I answered, "I am sad, because
these unmerited honours these good people do me, seem to be the shortest way
the devil has found to destroy me." "But the reform you have brought
about is so admirable and so complete the good which is done to the
individuals, as well as to the whole country, is so great and universal, that
the people want to show you their gratitude." "Do you know, my dear
friends," I answered, "that that marvelous change is too great to be
the work of man? It is not evidently the work of God? To Him, and Him alone,
then we ought to give the praise and the glory."
My constant habit, after these days of ovation, was to pass a part of the night
in prayer to God, to the Virgin Mary, and to all the saints in heaven, to
prevent me from being hurt by these worldly honours. It was my custom then to
read the passion of Jesus Christ, from His triumphant entry into Jerusalem to
His death on the cross, in order to prevent this shining dust from adhering to
my soul. There was a verse of the Gospel which I used to repeat very often in
the midst of these exhibitions of the vanities of this world: "What is a
man profited, if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul?"
(Matt. xvi. 26).
Another source of serious anxiety for me was then coming from the large sums of
money constantly flowing from the hands of my too kind and grateful reformed
countrymen into mine. It was very seldom that the public expression of
gratitude presented me in their rhetorical addresses were not accompanied by a
gift of from fifty dollars to two hundred dollars, according to the means and
importance of the place. Those sums multiplies by the 365 days of the year
would have soon made of me one of the richest men of Canada. Had I been able to
trust in my own strength against the dangers of riches, I should have been
able, easily, to accumulate a sum of at least seventy thousand dollars, with
which I might have done a great amount of good.
But I confess that, when in the presence of God, I went to the bottom of my
heart, to see if it were strong enough to carry such a glittering weight, I
found it, by far, too weak. I knew so many who, though evidently stronger than
I was, had fallen on the way and perished under too heavy burden of their
treasures, that I feared for myself at the sight of such unexpected and immense
fortune. Besides, when only eighteen years old, my venerable and dear
benefactor, the Rev. Mr. Leprohon, director of the College of Nicolet, had told
me a thing I never had forgotten: "Chiniquy," he said, "I am
sure you will be what we call a successful man in the world. You will easily
make your way among your contemporaries; and, consequently, it is probable that
you will have many opportunities of becoming rich. But when the silver and gold
flow into your hands, do not pile and keep it. For, if you set your affection
on it, you will be miserable in this world and damned in the next. You must not
do like the fattened hogs which give their grease only after their death. Give
it while you are living. Then you will not be blessed only by God and man, but
you will be blessed by your own conscience. You will live in peace and die in
joy."
These solemn warnings from one of the wisest and best friends God had ever
given me, when young, has never gone out of my mind. I found them corroborated
in every page of that Bible which I loved so much, and studied every day. I
found them also written, by God, in my heart. I then, on my knees, took the
resolution, without making an absolute vow to it, to keep only what I wanted
for my daily support and give the rest to the poor, or some Christian or
patriotic object. I kept that promise. The $500 given me by Parliament did not
remain three weeks in my hands. I never put a cent in Canada in the vaults of
any bank; and when I left for Illinois, in the fall of 1851, instead of taking
with me 70,000 dollars, as it would have been very easy, had I been so minded,
I had hardly 1,500 dollars in hand, the price of a part of my library, which
was too heavy to be carried so far away.
.
CHAPTER 45
The
15th of August, 1850, I preached in the Cathedral of Montreal, on the Blessed
Virgin Mary's power in heaven, when interceding for sinners, I was sincerely
devoted to the Virgin Mary. Nothing seemed to me more natural than to pray to
her, and rely on her protection. The object of my sermon was to show that Jesus
Christ cannot refuse any of the petitions presented to Him by His mother; that
she has always obtained the favours she asked her Son, Jesus, to grant to her
devotees. Of course, my address was more sentimental than scriptural, as it is
the style among the priests of Rome. But I was honest; and I sincerely believed
what I said.
"Who among you, my dear brethren," I said to the people, "will
refuse any of the reasonable demands of a beloved mother? Who will break and
sadden her loving heart when, with supplicating voice and tears, she presents
to you a petition which it is in your power, nay, to your interest, to grant?
For my own part, were my beloved mother still living, I would prefer to have my
right hand crushed and burned into cinders, to have my tongue cut out, than to
say, No! to my mother, asking me any favour which it was in my power to bestow.
These are the sentiments which the God of Sinai wanted to engrave in the very
hearts of humanity, when giving His laws to Moses, in the midst of lightning
and thunders, and these are the sentiments which the God of the Gospel wanted
to impress on our souls by the shedding of His blood on Calvary. The sentiments
of filial respect and obedience to our mothers, Christ Jesus, the Son of God
and Son of Mary, practiced to perfection. Although God and man, He was still in
perfect submission to the will of His mother, of which He makes a law to each
of us. The Gospel says, in reference to His parents, Joseph and Mary, He 'was
subject unto them' (Luke ii. 51). What a grand and shining revelation we have
in these few short words: Jesus was subject unto Mary! Is it not written, that
Jesus is the same today, as He was yesterday, and will be for ever? (Heb. xiii.
8). He has not changed. He is still the Son of Mary, as He was when only twelve
years old. In His divine humanity, He is still subject unto Mary, as He was
then. This is why our holy Church, which is the pillar and fountain of Truth,
invites you and me, today, to put an unbounded confidence in her intercession.
Remembering that Jesus has always granted the petitions presented to Him by His
divine mother, let us put our petitions in her hands, if we want to receive the
favours we are in need of.
"The second reason why we must all go to Mary, for the favours we want
from heaven, is that we are sinners rebels in the sight of God. Jesus Christ is
our Saviour. Yes! but He is also our God, infinitely just, infinitely holy. He
hates our sins with an infinite hatred. He abhors our rebellions with an
infinite, a godly hatred. If we had loved and served Him faithfully we might go
to Him, not only with the hope, but with the assurance of being welcomed. But
we have forgotten and offended Him; we have trampled His blood under our feet;
we have joined with those who nailed Him on the cross, pierced His heart with
the lance, and shed His blood to the last drop. We belong to the crowd which
mocked at His tortures, and insulted Him at His death. How can we dare to look
at Him and meet His eyes? Must we not tremble in His presence? Must we not fear
before that Lion of the tribe of Judah whom we have wounded and nailed to the
cross? Where is the rebel who does not shiver, when he is dragged to the feet
of the mighty Prince against whom he has drawn the sword? What will he do if he
wants to obtain pardon? Will he go himself and speak to that offended Majesty?
No! But he looks around the throne to see if he can find some of the great
officers, and friends, or some powerful and influential person through whose intercession
he can obtain pardon. If he finds any such, he goes immediately to him, puts
his petitions into their hands, and they go to the foot of the throne to plead
for the rebel, and the favour which would have been indignantly refused to the
guilty subject, had he dared to speak himself, is granted, when it is asked by
a faithful officer, a kind friend, a dear sister, or a beloved mother. This is
why our holy church, speaking through her infallible supreme pontiff, the Vicar
of Christ, Gregory XVI., has told us, in the most solemn manner, that 'Mary is
the only hope of sinners.'"
Winding up my arguments, I added: "We are those insolent ungrateful
rebels. Jesus is that King of kings against whom we have, a thousand times,
risen in rebellion. He has a thousand good reasons to refuse our petitions, if
we are impudent enough to speak to Him ourselves. But look at the right hand of
the offended King, and behold His dear and divine mother. She is your mother
also. For it is to every one of us, as well as to John, that Christ said on the
cross, speaking of Mary, 'Behold thy mother' (John xix. 27). Jesus has never
refused any favour asked by that Queen of Heaven. He cannot rebuke His mother.
Let us go to her; let us ask her to be our advocate and plead our cause, and
she will do it. Let us suppliantly request her to ask for our pardon, and she
will get it."
I then sincerely took these glittering sophisms for the true religion of
Christ, as all the priests and people of Rome are bound to take them today, and
presented them with all the earnestness of an honest, though deluded mind.
My sermon had made a visible and deep impression. Bishop Prince, coadjutor of
my Lord Bourget, who was among my hearers, thanked and congratulated me for the
good effect it would have on the people, and I sincerely thought I had said
what was true and right before God.
But when night came, before going to bed, I took my Bible as usual, knelt down
before God, in the neat little room I occupied in the bishop's palace, and read
the twelfth chapter of Matthew, with a praying heart and a sincere desire to
understand it, and be benefited thereby. Strange to say! when I reached the
40th verse, I felt a mysterious awe, as if I had entered for the first time
into a new and most holy land. Though I had read that verse and the following
many times, they came to my mind with a freshness and newness as if I had never
seen them before. There was a lull in my mind for some moments. Slowly, and
with breathless attention, supreme veneration and respect, I read the history
of that visit of Mary to the sacred spot where Jesus, my Saviour, was standing
in the midst of the crowd feeding His happy hearers with the bread of life.
When I contemplated that blessed Mary, whom I loved, as so tenderly approaching
the house where she was to meet her divine Son, who had been so long absent
from her, my heart suddenly throbbed in sympathy with hers. I felt as if
sharing her unspeakable joy at every step which brought her nearer to her
adorable and beloved Son. What tears had she not shed when Jesus had left her
alone, in her now, poor, and cheerless home, that He might preach the Gospel in
the distant places, where His Father had sent Him! With Jesus in her humble
home, was she not more happy then than the greatest queen on her throne! Did
she not possess a treasure more precious than all the world! How sweet to her
ears and heart were the words she had heard from His lips!
How lovely the face of the most beautiful among the sons of men! How happy she
must have felt, when she heard that He was, now, near enough to allow her to go
and see Him! How quick were her steps. How cheerful and interesting the
meeting! How the beloved Saviour will repay by His respectful and divine love
to His beloved mother, the trouble and the fatigue of her long journey! My
heart beat with joy at the privilege of witnessing that interview, and of
hearing the respectful words Jesus would address to His mother!
With heart and soul throbbing with these feelings, I slowly read "While He
yet talked to the people, behold His mother and His brethren stood without,
desiring to speak with Him. Then one said unto Him: Behold, Thy mother and Thy
brethren stand without, desiring to speak with Thee. But He answered and said
unto him that told Him: Who is My mother? and Who are My brethren? And He
stretched forth His hands towards His disciples, and said: Behold My mother and
My brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of My Father which is in Heaven,
the same is My brother, and sister, and mother."
I had hardly finished reading the last verse, when big drops of sweat began to
flow from my face, my heart beat with a tremendous speed, and I came near
fainting; I sat in my large arm-chair, expecting every minute to fall on the
floor. Those alone who have stood several hours at the falls of the marvelous
Niagara, heard the thundering noise of its waters, and felt the shaking of the
rocks under their feet, can have any idea of what I felt in that hour of agony.
A voice, the voice of my conscience, whose thunders were like the voice of a
thousand Niagaras was telling me: "Do you not see that you have preached a
sacrilegious lie this morning, when, from the pulpit, you said to your ignorant
and deluded people, that Jesus always granted the petitions of His mother, Mary?
Are you not ashamed to deceive yourself, and deceive your poor countrymen with
such silly falsehoods?"
"Read, read again these words! and understand that, far from granting all
the petitions of Mary, Jesus has always, except when a child, said No! to her
requests. He has always rebuked her, when she asked Him anything in public!
Here she comes to ask Him a favour before the whole people. It is the easiest,
the most natural favour that a mother ever asked of her son. It is a favour
that a son has never refused to a mother. He answers by a rebuke, a public and
solemn rebuke! It is through want of love and respect for Mary that He gave her
that rebuke? No! Never a son loved and respected a mother as He did. But it was
a solemn protest against the blasphemous worship of Mary as practiced in the
Church of Rome."
I felt at once so bewildered and confounded, by the voice which was shaking my
very bones, that I thought it was the devil's voice; and, for a moment, I
feared less I was possessed of a demon. "My God," I cried, "have
mercy on me! Come to my help! Save me from my enemy's hands!" As quick as
lightning the answer came: "It is not Satan's voice you hear. It is I, thy
Saviour and thy God, who speaks to thee. Read what Mark, Luke, and John tell
you about the way I received her petitions, from the very day I began to work,
and speak publicly as the Son of God, and the Saviour of the world."
These cries of my awakening intelligence were sounding in my ears for more than
one hour, before I consented to obey them. At last, with a trembling hand, and
a distressed mind, I took my Bible and read in St. Mark: "There came then
His brethren and his mother, and standing without, sent unto Him, calling Him.
And the multitude sat about Him and they said unto Him, Behold, Thy mother and
Thy brethren without, seek for Thee. And He answered them, saying, Who is My
mother, or My brethren? And He looked around about on them which sat about Him,
and said, Behold My mother and My brethren. For whosoever shall do the will of
God, the same is My brother, and My sister, and mother" (Mark iii. 31 35).
The reading of these words acted upon me as the shock of a sword going through
and through the body of one who had already been mortally wounded. I felt
absolutely confounded. The voice continued to sound in my ears: "Do you
not see you have presented a blasphemous lie, every time you said that Jesus
always granted the petitions of His mother?"
I remained again, a considerable time, bewildered, not knowing how to fight
down thoughts which were so mercilessly shaking my faith, and demolishing the
respect I had kept, till then, for my Church. After more than half an hour of
vain struggle to silence these thoughts, it came to my mind that St. Luke had
narrated this interview of Mary and Jesus in a very different way. I opened the
holy book again to read the eighth chapter. But how shall I find words to
express my distress when I saw that the rebuke of Jesus Christ was expressed in
a still sterner way by St. Luke than by the two other evangelists! "Then
came to Him His mother and His brethren, and could not come at Him for the
press. And it was told Him by certain which said, Thy mother and Thy brethren
stand without, desiring to see Thee. And He answered and said unto them, My
mother and My brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it"
(Luke viii. 19-21).
It then seemed to me as if those three evangelists said to me: "How dare
you preach with your apostate and lying Church, that Jesus has always granted
all the petitions of Mary, when we were ordered by God to write and proclaim
that all the public petitions she had presented to Him, when working as the Son
of God, and the Saviour of the world, had been answered by a public
rebuke?"
What could I answer? How could I stand the rebuke of these three evangelists?
Trembling from head to foot, I fell upon my knees, crying to the Virgin Mary to
come to my help and pray that I might not succumb to this temptation, and lose
my faith and confidence in her. But the more I prayed, the louder the voice
seemed to say: "How dare you preach that Jesus has always granted the
petitions of Mary, when we tell you the contrary by the order of God
Himself?"
My desolation became such, that a cold sweat covered my whole frame again; my
head was aching, and I think I would have fainted had I not been released by a
torrent of tears. In my distress, I cried: "Oh! my God! my God! look down
upon me in Thy mercy; strengthen my faith in Thy Holy Church! Grant me to
follow her voice and obey her commands with more and more fidelity; she is Thy
beloved Church. She cannot err. She cannot be an apostate Church." But in
vain I wept and cried for help. My whole being was filled with dismay and
terror from the voices of the three witnesses, who were crying louder and louder:
"How dare you preach that Christ has always granted the petitions of Mary,
when the gospels, written under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, tell you so
clearly the contrary?"
When I had, in vain, wept, prayed, cried, and struggled from ten at night till
three in the morning, the miraculous change of water into wine, by Christ, at
the request of his mother, suddenly came to my mind. I felt a momentary relief
from my terrible distress, by the hope that I could prove to myself that in
this case the Saviour had obeyed he demands of His holy mother. I eagerly
opened my Bible again and read:
"And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother
of Jesus was there. And both Jesus was called, and His disciples, to the
marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto Him, They
have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? Mine
hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever He saith
unto you, do it" (John ii. 1-5).
Till that hour I had always accepted that text in the sense given in the Church
of Rome, as proving that the very first miracle of Jesus Christ was wrought at
the request of His mother. And I was preparing myself to answer the three
mysterious witnesses: "Here is the proof that you are three devils, and
not three evangelists, when you tell me that Jesus has never granted the
petitions of His mother, except when a child. Here is the glorious title of
Mary to my confidence in her intercession; here is the seal of her irresistible
superhuman power over her divine Son; here is the undeniable evidence that
Jesus cannot refuse anything asked by His divine mother!" But when, armed
with these explanations of the church, I was preparing to meet what Matthew,
St. Mark, and St. Luke had just told me, a sudden distressing thought came to
my mind; and this thought was as if I heard the three witnesses saying:
"How can you be so blind as not to see that instead of being a favour
granted to Mary, this first miracle is the first opportunity chosen by Christ
to protest against her intercession. It is a solemn warning to Mary never to
ask anything from Him, and to us, never to put any confidence in her requests.
Here, Mary, evidently full of compassion for those poor people, who had not the
means to provide the wine for the guests who had come with Jesus, wants her Son
to give them the wine they wanted. How does Christ answer her requests? He
answers it by a rebuke, a most solemn rebuke. Instead of saying, "Yes,
mother, I will do as you wish," He says, "Woman, what have I to do
with thee?" which clearly means, "Woman, thou hast nothing to do in
this matter. I do not want you to speak to me of the bridegroom's distress. It
was My desire to come to their help and show My divine power. I do not want you
to put yourself between the wants of humanity and Me. I do not want the world
to believe that you had any right, any power or influence over me, or more
compassion on the miseries of man than I have. Is it not to Me and Me alone,
the lost children of Adam must look to be saved? Woman, what have I to do with
thee in My great work of saving this perishing world? Nothing, absolutely
nothing. I know what I have to do to fulfill, not our will, but My Father's
will!"
This is what Jesus meant by the solemn rebuke given to Mary. He wanted to
banish all idea of her ever becoming an intercessor between man and Christ. He
wanted to protest against the doctrine of the Church of Rome, that it is
through Mary that He will bestow His favour to His disciples, and Mary
understood it well when she said, "Whatsoever He saith unto you, do
it." Never come to me, but got to Him. "For there is none other name
under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved" (Acts iv. 12).
Every one of these thoughts passed over my distressed soul like a hurricane.
Every sentence was like a flash of lightning in a dark night. I was like the
poor dismantled ship suddenly overtaken by the tempest in the midst of the
ocean.
Till the dawn of day, I felt powerless against the efforts of God to pull down
and demolish the huge fortress of sophisms, falsehoods, idolatries, which Rome
had built around my soul. What a fearful thing it is to fight against the Lord!
During the long hours of that night, my God was contending with me, and I was
struggling against Him. But though brought down to the dust, I was not
conquered. My understanding was very nearly convinced. My rebellious and proud
will was not yet ready to yield.
The chains by which I was tied to the feet of the idols of Rome, though rudely
shaken, were not yet broken. However, to say the truth, my views about the
worship of Mary had received a severe shock, and were much modified. That night
had been sleepless; and in the morning my eyes were red, and my face swollen
with my tears. When at breakfast, Bishop Prince, who was sitting by me, asked:
"Are you sick? Your eyes are as if you had wept all night?"
"Your lordship is not mistaken, I have wept the whole night!" I
answered. "Wept all the night!" replied the bishop. "Might I know
the cause of your sorrow?" "Yes, my lord. You can, you must know it.
But please come to your room. What I have to say is of such a private and
delicate nature, that I want to be alone with your lordship, when opening my
mind to the cause of my tears."
Bishop Prince, then coadjutor of Bishop Bourget and late bishop of St.
Hyacinthe, where he became insane in 1858 and died in 1860, had been my
personal friend from the time I entered the college at Nicolet, where he was
professor of Rhetoric. He very often came to confession to me, and had taken a
lively interest in my labours on temperance.
When alone with him, I said: "My lord, I thank you for your kindness in
allowing me to unburden my heart to you. I have passed the most horrible night
of my life. Temptations against our holy religion such as I never had before,
have assailed me all night. Your lordship remembers the kind words you
addressed to me yesterday about the sermon I preached. But, last night, very
different things came to my mind, which have changed the joys of yesterday into
the most unspeakable desolation. You congratulated me yesterday on the manner I
had proved that Jesus had always granted the requests of His mother, and that
He cannot refuse any of her petitions. The whole night it has been told me that
this was a blasphemous lie, and from the Holy Scriptures themselves, I have
been nearly convinced that you and I, nay, that our holy church, are preaching
a blasphemous falsehood every time we proclaim the doctrines of the worship of
Mary as the Gospel truth."
The poor bishop, thunderstruck by this simple and honest declaration, quickly
answered: "I hope you have not yielded to these temptations, and that you
will not become a Protestant as so many of your enemies whisper to each
other."
"It is my hope, my lord, that our merciful God will keep me, to the end of
my life, a dutiful and faithful priest of our holy church. However, I cannot
conceal from your lordship that my faith was terribly shaken last night.
"As a bishop, your portion of light and wisdom must be greater than mine.
I hope you will grant me some of the lights which will brightly shine before
your eyes: I have never been so much in need of the counsels of your piety and
the help of your scriptural knowledge as today. Please help me to come out from
the intellectual slough in which I spent the night.
"Your lordship has congratulated me for having said that Jesus Christ has
always granted the petitions of Mary. Please tell me how you reconcile that
proposition with the text;" and I handed him the Gospel of Matthew,
pointing to the last five verses of the twelfth chapter, I requested him to
read them aloud.
He read them and said: "Now, what do you want from me?"
"My lord, I want respectfully to ask you how we can say that Jesus has
always granted the requests of His mother, when this evangelist tells us that
He never granted her petitions, when acting in His capacity of Saviour of the
world.
"Must we not fear that we proclaim a blasphemous falsehood when we support
a proposition directly opposed to the Gospel?"
The poor bishop seemed absolutely confounded by this simple and honest
question. I also felt confused and sorry for his humiliation. Beginning a
phrase, he would give it up; trying arguments, he could not push to their conclusion.
It seemed to me that he had never read that text, of if he had read it, he,
like myself and the rest of the priests of Rome, had never noted that they
entirely demolish the stupendous impostures of the church, in reference to the
worship of Mary.
In order to help him out of the inextricable difficulties into which I had at
once pushed him, I said: "My lord, will you allow me to put a few more
questions to you?"
"With pleasure," he answered.
"Well! my lord, who came to this world to save you and me? Is it Jesus or
Mary?"
"It is Jesus," answered the bishop.
"Now, please allow me a few more questions."
"When Jesus and Mary were on earth, whose heart was most devoted to
sinners? Who loved them with a more efficacious and saving love; was it Jesus
or Mary?"
"Jesus, being God, His love was evidently more efficacious and saving than
Mary's," answered the bishop.
"In the days of Jesus and Mary, to whom did Jesus invite sinners to go for
their salvation; was it to Himself or Mary?" I asked again.
The bishop answered: "Jesus has said to all sinners, 'Come unto Me.' He
never said, come or go to Mary."
"Have we any examples, in the Scriptures, of sinners, who, fearing to be
rebuked by Jesus, have gone to Mary and obtained access to Him through her, and
been saved through her intercessions?"
"I do not remember of any such cases," replied the bishop.
I then asked: "To whom did the penitent thief on the cross address himself
to be saved; was it to Jesus or Mary?"
"It was to Jesus," replied the bishop.
"Did that penitent thief do well to address himself to Jesus on the cross,
rather than to Mary who was at his feet?" said I.
"Surely he did better," answered the bishop.
"Now, my lord, allow me only one question more. You told me that Jesus
loved sinners, when on earth, infinitely more than Mary; that He was infinitely
more their true friend than she was; that He infinitely took more interest in
their salvation than Mary; that it was infinitely better for sinners to go to
Jesus than to Mary, to be saved; will you please tell me if you think that
Jesus has lost, in heaven, since He is sitting at the right hand of His Father,
any of His divine and infinite superiority of love and mercy over Mary for
sinners; and can you show me that what Jesus has lost has been gained by
Mary?"
"I do not think that Christ has lost any of His love and power to save us
now that He is in heaven," answered the bishop.
"Now, my lord, if Jesus is still my best friend, my most powerful,
merciful, and loving friend, why should I not go directly to Him? Why should
we, for a moment, go to any one who is infinitely inferior, in power, love, and
mercy, for our salvation?"
The bishop was stunned by my question.
He stammered some unintelligible answer, excused himself for not being able to
remain any longer, on account of some pressing business; and extending his hand
to me before leaving, he said, "You will find an answer to your questions
and difficulties in the Holy Fathers."
"Can you lend me the Holy Fathers, my lord?"
He replied, "No, sir, I have them not."
This last answer, from my bishop, shook my faith to its foundation, and left my
mind in a state of great distress. With the sincere hope of finding in the Holy
Fathers some explanations which would dispel my painful doubts, I immediately
went to Mr. Fabre, the great bookseller of Montreal, who got me, from France,
the splendid edition of the Holy Fathers, by Migne. I studied, with the utmost
attention, every page where I might find what they taught of the worship of
Mary, and the doctrines that Jesus Christ had never refused any of her prayers.
What was my desolation, my shame, and my surprise to find that the Holy Fathers
of the first six centuries had never advocated the worship of Mary, and that
the many eloquent pages on the power of Mary in heaven, and her love for
sinners, found in every page of my theologians, and other ascetic books I had
read till then, were but impudent lies; additions interpolated in their works,
a hundred years after their death. When discovering these forgeries, under the
name of the Holy Fathers, of which my church was guilty, how many times, in the
silence of my long nights of study and prayerful meditations, did I hear a
voice telling me: "Come out of Babylon!"
But where could I go? Out of the Church of Rome, where could I find that
salvation which was to be found only within her walls? I said to myself,
"Surely there are some errors in my dear church! The dust of ages may have
fallen on the precious gold of her treasures, but will I not find still more
damnable errors among those hundreds of Protestant churches, which, under the
name of Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, ect., ect., are
divided and subdivided into scores of contemptible sects, anathematizing and
denouncing each other before the world?"
My ideas of the great family of evangelical churches, comprised under the broad
name of Protestantism, were so exaggerated then, that it was absolutely
impossible for me to find in them that unity, which I considered the essentials
of the church of Christ. The hour was not yet come, but it was coming fast,
when my dear Saviour would make me understand His sublime words: "I am the
vine, and ye are the branches."
It was some time later, when under the beautiful vine I had planted in my own
garden, and which I had cultivated with mine own hands, I saw that there was
not a single branch like another in that prolific vine. Some branches were very
big, some very thin, some very long, some very short, some going up, some going
down, some straight as an arrow, some crooked as a flash of lightning, some
turning to the west, some to the east, some to the north, and others to the
south. But, although the branches were so different from each other in so many
things, they all gave me excellent fruit, so long as they remained united to
the vine.
.