What Saints will be in the Tribulation?
The question, Will the saints be in the
tribulation? suggests itself to every one who is occupied with the hopes of the
church of God and the prophetic declarations of Scripture as to the close of
this earth's painful and laborious history. Personal anxiety suggests it on one
hand, and on the other it connects intimately with the gravest and most vital
points of prophetic enquiry; or rather of the true character of the church of
God and its condition at the close.
I cannot, in the space allowed me here, enter at
large into the declarations of the Old Testament as to a remnant, nor of the
New as to the church. But a short answer to the question itself will help to
throw light on the points I allude to and on the rapture of the saints. I
purpose adding a development of the true force of 2 Thessalonians 1, 2, so
often introduced in the discussions which have arisen on these subjects.
And first, as to our being in the tribulation: How do I know there will be a tribulation? I must get some revelation of it. He who would place the church in it will answer me, I am sure, that the Scriptures are clear on the point. There will be at the close a tribulation, a time such as there has never been, till the Lord's coming brings deliverance. What, then, are the Scriptures which tell us that there will be such tribulation? I am not aware of any other direct ones than these: Jeremiah 30: 7; Daniel 12: 1; Matthew 24: 21; Mark 13: 19 (Luke does not speak of it nor of the abomination of desolation); to which we may add the more general passages of Revelation 3: 10; chap. 7: 14. The first four passages do effectively prove that there will be a time of tribulation such as never was since there was a nation, or, as it is expressed in Mark, "such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created, neither shall be." The passages from Revelation apply, we shall see, to a wider sphere than the preceding ones; but as they speak of a great tribulation, I have, of course, quoted them. There will be then a tribulation. The other part of the question still remains: Shall we, who compose the church, be in this tribulation?
The answer to this question must be sought in
the passages which speak of the tribulation itself. The first of them, Jeremiah
30: 7, is as clear as possible in announcing those to whom it applies: "It
is the time of Jacob's trouble, but he shall be delivered out of it." This
time, then, of trouble, such as never was nor will be (so that there cannot be two),
is the time of Jacob's trouble. Nothing can be clearer or more distinct. The
whole chapter may be read, which sets it in the clearest light. It is not
merely that Jacob may be found there, but when it is said, "Alas! for that
day is great, there is none like it," the trouble spoken of is Jacob's
trouble.
The next is Daniel 12: 1. This is also
positively declared to be of Daniel's people. The whole prophecy is the
description of what is to happen to Daniel's people in the last days. Dan. 10:
14. Michael, also (compare Dan. 10: 21), Will then stand up for that people,
and, as Jeremiah had said, they will be delivered (that is, the elect remnant -
those written in the book). Daniel's testimony then is also quite clear. The
tribulation is the tribulation of Daniel's people. But this is the rather
important because it carries us at once to Matthew, the Lord Himself declaring
that He speaks of this same time and same event, using the terms of Daniel, and
referring to him by name as well as to the statements of the passage. Compare
Matt. 24: 15; Daniel 12: 11.
But all the language of the passage in Matthew
confirms this. Those who are in Judea are to flee to the mountains. Those
who are on the housetop are not to come down to seek anything. The abomination
which causes desolation stands in the holy place. They are to pray that their
flight may not be on the sabbath. False Christs and false prophets are to
seduce with the hopes cherished by the Jewish people. All is local and Jewish -
has no application to hopes which rest on going to meet Christ in the air. What
is in question is "flesh" being "saved" (i.e., life
spared on earth). Mark relates evidently to the same event and almost
exactly in the same terms. Thus these four passages, which speak of the
unequalled tribulation, apply it distinctly to Jacob,
Jerusalem, and Judea, and the Jews, not to the church. It is
entirely another order and sphere of things from the church, and professedly
so.
There are two passages which, as I have said, are more
general: Revelation 3: 10 and Revelation 7: 14. Do these, then, apply to the
church? The language of Revelation 3: 10 is this, "Because thou hast kept
the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation,
which shall come upon all the world to try them which dwell on the earth."
That is, when the church is addressed, it is with a declaration that she will
be kept from that hour which shall come to try others. So that thus far the
testimonies of Scripture declare that the unequalled tribulation is for Jacob,
and that, when the time of temptation is spoken of in addressing the church, it
is to declare that the faithful shall be kept out of it.
Revelation 7: 14 may seem more difficult; still it bears
witness to the same truth. For the heavenly kings and priests (that is, the
elders who have represented them from the beginning of the second or strictly
prophetic part of the book) are professedly another class of persons, who have
not come out of the great tribulation. One of these elders explains to John who
those who have come out of the great tribulation are, another class of persons
from themselves. One of them asks John, Who are these who are arrayed in white
robes? etc. John refers to him, and then he explains. That is, the crowned
elders are quite a different class from them; so that, while admitting the
passage to be obscure in certain points, it is clear in this - in giving us the
elders and those who came out of the tribulation as two distinct classes. The
crowned elders are not at all represented as having been in it, but as pointing
out others as those that come out of it. Every element of the description of
these persons confirms this distinction.
Another passage - Revelation 12 - while not using the term
tribulation, yet speaking of the epoch at which it is to happen, strongly
confirms this same truth. When Satan and his angels are defeated by Michael, he
is cast out and come down to the earth, having great wrath, knowing he has but
a short time, and persecutes the woman. Now what is the effect of this most
important event on those who can celebrate its bearing? That the trial of the
heavenly saints is ended, and that of the inhabiters of the earth and the sea
just about to begin in its most formidable shape, because Satan is cast down
there. The language is this: "Now is come salvation, and strength, and the
kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ; for the accuser of our
brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night: and
they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony,
and they loved not their lives unto the death. Therefore rejoice, ye heavens,
and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the
sea," etc. Now I do not say that this is the moment of the rapture, for I
think it is included in the man-child's being caught up. But I say this that,
at the moment of the commencement of the great rage of Satan for the three
times and a half, the entire deliverance of the heavenly saints from his power,
and their definite triumph is celebrated; that is, they are not exposed to that
last time of Satan's rage. This chapter, then, confirms, in the fullest way,
the exemption of the church from the last and dreadful time of trial. I am
satisfied that the whole teaching and structure of the Revelation confirms the
same truth; but this would evidently lead me into too large a sphere of
enquiry.
We have found that the passages which speak of the
tribulation first apply it directly to the Jews on one side, and then exclude
the church from it on the other. I do not see how such a point as this could be
made clearer by scripture.
I now turn to the interpretation of 2 Thessalonians 1, 2.
There is in the latter chapter and (I think I may say) acknowledged
mistranslation, of which the true and undoubted sense gives the key to the
whole passage. I refer to verse 2, "as that the day of Christ is at
hand": it should be "is present." The word is used for, and
translated in two different places, "present," in contrast with
things to come - "things present and things to come." This is
always its sense in Scripture. What the Thessalonians were troubled and upset
in their minds by, then, was that they had been led by false teachers
(pretending to the Spirit, and even alleging a letter of Paul to this effect)
to suppose that the day of Christ was actually come. The violence of
persecution was very great; and as the day of the Lord is in effect spoken of
as a day of terror and trial in the Old Testament, these false
teachers had profited by this to persuade them it was there.
The apostle with divine wisdom sets them morally right in
chapter 1, as to their feelings and sentiments as to this, before entering in
the second into positive instruction as to the fact of the Lord's coming. He
shews them the folly (since Christ was to appear for that day, He Himself being
present in it) of supposing that it was His own people and faithful ones He was
going to make suffer and cast into distress and tribulation. No; it was His
enemies and theirs who would be in affliction in that day, and they themselves
in rest and peace. The very righteousness of God would assure this. It was a
righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble them,
and to His troubled ones rest, when Christ shall be revealed, for this was what
brought in the day. It was only shewn by their tribulations that He counted
them worthy of His kingdom that was then to come.
In a word, as the day was Christ's and brought in by His
personal presence, when it was there they would have rest and their persecutors
trouble. It is the contrast of state when the day is there, not the epoch of
its commencement, which is spoken of. Indeed, had it been so, it would have
been a poor and uninspired comfort, for they would not have rest yet. On the other
hand, the adversaries of the constant expectation of Christ would gain nothing;
for the apostle's words so interpreted would have led the saints at
Thessalonica to a constant expectation of His appearing, instead of their
rapture, as the moment of getting rest. But the truth is, the using the Greek
word anesis (rest) as significative of the moment of attaining the rest
is a mistake. The word, though used for the time of obtaining relaxation, is
equally used for a state of ease, or even pleasure. It is never used in
Scripture for the moment of obtaining relaxation from trial, but always in the
general sense of a state of ease, one contrasted with theipsis (distress).
The whole and sole force of the apostle's reasoning is this, that as the Lord
Himself was to bring in the day, it could not, when there, be a day of distress
for His people, but evidently for His enemies and their persecutors. In chapter
2 he proceeds to unfold to them the real order of the events, and especially in
connection with the place they had in them.
Here, again, we meet a question of criticism, but it affects
very little the reasoning of the apostle. Some would change here the authorised
English version, and read, "But we beseech you, brethren, concerning the
coming," etc., instead of "by the coming." The preposition
itself is used in both ways; but its constant force with words of beseeching is
'by' (sometimes 'for,' which has no place here). The force of the apostle's
reasoning is this, that as they were to be gathered together to Christ,
they could not be in the day which was to come by His appearing; they were to
go to meet Him in the air, and hence could not be in the judgments of that day,
it trials or its terrors.
The apostle had taught them in his first epistle that they
were to be caught up to meet the Lord in the air. Hence he could refer to it as
a known truth. The saints were not to await the coming of the day of the Lord
on the earth, but to go up to meet Him in the air, and be for ever with Him.
Did He appear, they, we know, would appear with Him. But here he speaks of what
they ought to have remembered, that they would go up before the day, and hence
they could not possibly be there in their actual state on earth, if the day
was. The church's connection with the return of the Lord was, to go up to meet
Him in the air, to be gathered unto Him. The day was entirely another thing; it
was vengeance from His presence. Neither could the day therefore come before
the objects of
vengeance were there. An apostasy would come, and the man of
sin would be revealed, whom the Lord would consume with the breath of His
mouth, and destroy by the appearing of His presence.
That is, we have two things (which from other scriptures
also we know to be distinct, exactly in this way, Christ's coming, and the
manifestation of it; for when He appears, we shall appear with Him - hence we must
be with Him before even He appears at all, yet at His coming), the coming
of Christ and the public epiphany of His presence, with one of which the saints
are directly connected, by being gathered together to Him; with the other, the
day, because at His appearing He will execute judgment against the ungodly.
They will be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the
Lord, and from the glory of His power. But He will come to be glorified in His
saints, and admired in all them that believe; that is, they will be in the
display of this glory in that day. They will appear with Him in glory - be like
Him. Now it is quite certain they will not appear with Him when they are
caught up to meet Him in the air. Thus it is not merely particular expressions,
though these are clear and forcible, but the bearing, and object, and course of
reasoning of the whole chapter, which shews the distinction of the rapture of
the saints before Christ appears, and the coming of the day when He is admired
in them.
What is important to remark is, the entire difference of
relationship in which the saints are put with Christ: we belong to Him, go to
meet Him, appear with Him, are glorified together. The practical result is, not
merely to clear up a question of dates and of time, but to change the whole
spirit and character of our waiting and Christ's coming. We wait for Him to
come and take us to Himself, the full realisation of our heavenly calling.
There are no events connected with our relationship with Christ. We have no
need of judgment to participate in blessing under Him; we go out of the midst
of all events to meet Him above. The Jews and the world are delivered by judgments.
Hence they must await the course of events and the full ripening of earthly
evil for judgment; for the day will not come before. Hence, we find in the
Psalms the appeal for judgment and the times of it, the
declaration of the overwhelming character of evil, and the
cry to God to shew Himself and render a reward to the proud. The church on
earth has no need to seek this; she belongs to Christ, and will be caught up to
heaven out of the evil.
I add a few words on another passage suggested to me as one
by which difficulties have been created in some minds, really desirous of the
truth. I mean the connection of chapters 4 and 5 of first Thessalonians. I
confess it does not affect my own in any way; but as it does the minds of
others, it is well to notice it. The difficulty, if there be any, arises from a
serious confusion in the minds of those who make it - the very confusion into
which the Thessalonians were led, namely, taking tribulation for the day of
Christ. For the day of Christ, Christ must appear. Let us only keep this clear
in our minds, and all these difficulties vanish.
The Thessalonians looked so earnestly for Christ's coming,
with no further knowledge of the manner or order of it, that they thought
believers who had died, and perhaps died even for Christ, would not be there to
meet Him. This mistake the apostle corrects. He tells them that they must not
grieve as those without hope; that they would not be left out of the cortege
of glory; that Christ would bring them with Him. He then explains to them
the manner, and shews that it is by their resurrection, which would take place
before even the then living ones are changed; and when this is also wrought by
divine power, all would go up to meet Him in the air, and so they would be for
ever with the Lord. This parenthetically explains the manner by express
revelation. They will go up to meet Him - subsequently, as we have seen from
Colossians, appear with Him when He appears. The parenthetical part merely
gives the association of the saints with Christ Himself, which is our proper
portion.
But he had said, as a general truth, in answer to their
fears, that God would bring them with Christ. This leads him naturally to the
general subject. He had no need to speak of times and seasons. The
Thessalonians knew perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in
the night, and when they (the world) say Peace and safety, sudden destruction
would come upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; he adds, "But
ye, brethren, are not in darkness that that day should overtake you as a thief:
ye are all children of the day." It is alleged that the apostle could not
have said that the day would not overtake them as a thief, if they were not to
feel liable to be in some sort overtaken by it. Now, if the teaching of the
apostle be examined, even in the place, there is no possible ground for this:
for the day of the Lord Christ must appear. But he had just taught them that
they were to be caught up to meet Him in the air and be brought with Him. That
is, he had taught them what made it impossible to suggest that the day could
overtake them in any way or manner whatever. They were of the day, so to speak,
as he indeed says, "ye are children of the day," "let us who are
of the day."
This passage says nothing of not being in the tribulation -
we have treated that point already; but the objection confounds the tribulation
and the day which really closes it. The tribulation is Satan's power (though
God's judgment in woe); the day is Christ's, who makes it and binds him. But
the passage speaks not at all of the tribulation, though it supposes nothing of
the kind; but it does speak of the day of the Lord, and with instruction as to
the portion of the saints, which shews that it can have in no way whatever to
do with them. They are of it and to come in its power. All it says is - The day
will overtake them as a thief: but it will not overtake you, for ye are
of the day. It says nothing of times and seasons, but negatives the application
of the well-known truth to them.
jnd