You quote
Tobias also: that is, the Apocrypha. This is one of the terrible sins of Rome.
She has pretended to authenticate as scripture what was never owned as such
till the middle of the sixteenth century, and what the very person who made
the translation which she declares to be authentic states not to be scripture
at all. Over and over again he (Jerome) declares there are twenty-two
books, excluding thus the Apocrypha from the canon; and in particular, in his
preface to Tobias, says it was not in the Hebrew scriptures. In his preface to
the Books of Solomon he says, "As, therefore, the church reads, indeed, Judith
and Tobias, and the books of the Maccabees, but does not receive them among
canonical scriptures, so also let her read these two volumes, for the
edification of the people, not to establish the authority of ecclesiastical
dogmas." He refers to Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom. Athanasius reckons them
up also, twenty-two, both in the Synopsis (if it be his, for some have doubted
it), and in the fragment of the Festal epistle, giving them, he says, because
some would dare to mix apocryphal books with divine scriptures, and speaking of
Tobias and others as read, but not canonical.
Origen
tells us the same, Eusebius also. But, to be brief, Christ never cites these
books, nor are they found in the Hebrew at all. They were never owned by the
Jews as part of their scriptures. Josephus is distinct as to what was received,
and says there were none after Artaxerxes; that there were others, but
not canonical, and that the prophets gave their sanction to books as forming
part of the canon. He owned they have no kind of authority whatever; and all
authority, Jewish and Christian, declared they were not of the canon till the
Council of Trent. Now, the oracles of God are committed to the church, as of
old they were to the Jews. The church gives them no authority — it cannot to
what God has spoken; but when God had given them, He entrusted them to the
church to keep — only watching over it in all His providence — and Rome has
proved herself not the church by deliberate unfaithfulness to this, by setting
up as scripture what all Jews and the church, and all witnesses, declare with
one voice is not. She is self-condemned here. See what is said in Maccabees:
"If I have written well, and as befits the story, that is what I wish; if
ill, it is to be pardoned me." Why, it is blasphemy to ascribe such words
to the Holy Ghost; and of that blasphemy Rome is guilty.
JND