I first
take the ground, that the word of God received on authority (of men), is a
rejection of God's testimony. If I receive an account of another because you
put your name to it, it is because I do not believe the person who gives the
account. God may providentially make it to be received where this genuine faith
is not, but then it is not saving. To be saving it must be faith in God;
"he that hath received his testimony, has set to his seal that God is true:" he who demands the
church's authority to receive it has not. God may have used all manner of means of preserving, and even
authenticating the testimony, and so He has in many as we might expect; and I
believe that the scriptures were committed to the church to keep - not to
authorise, but to keep, as I keep a document safe. I give it no authority. It
has its own. But I keep it safe. Now God, I believe, providentially has done
this. But then the Roman body has decidedly failed in this, because at the Council
of Trent, which is with them of divine authority, (it) has declared that to be
scripture which declares
itself not to be so.
That is for example the [second book of] Maccabees, which concludes by saying,
If I have done well, it is as befits the subject; if ill, it is according to my
ability. Now it
is profane to suppose for an instant that
that is the Holy Ghost's inditing. The Prologus Galeatus indeed of Jerome,
generally prefixed to the Vulgate, declares that the Apocryphal books are not
scripture. Many other passages from the Apocrypha could be adduced, such as
that the offerings for the dead were those dead in mortal sin - that there are three contrary accounts
of the death of Antiochus - but I prefer the fact that one book of the
Maccabees declares it
is not scripture, as
above. Moreover, it is well known, that Sixtus V., acting under the authority
of the Council of Trent, promulgated as the only authentic word of God an
edition of the Vulgate, which was suppressed, because his successor Clement
altered it in two thousand places; five copies only of it are in existence. Clement's
bears in appearance its name. It has been in no sense, what the church ought to
be, a faithful keeper of the "oracles of God committed" to it.
Letter of JND to WK